History
  • No items yet
midpage
Don Beads v. Maryland State Police
16-1128
| 4th Cir. | Oct 13, 2016
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tonya Baña, TONYA BAÑA, LLC, Pikesville, Maryland, for Appellant. Brian E. Frosh, Attorney General of Maryland, Phillip M. Pickus, Assistant Attorney General, Pikesville, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

Don Beads appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants summary judgment on Beads’ race discrimination claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012), 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012), and Article 24 of the Maryland Declaration of Rights. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Beads v. Md. State Police, No. 1:12-cv-03219- WDQ (D. Md. Jan. 13, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Don Beads v. Maryland State Police
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Oct 13, 2016
Docket Number: 16-1128
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.