History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Burgener
S179181M
| Cal. | Oct 13, 2016
|
Check Treatment

*1 Filed 10/12/16

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, )

)

Plaintiff and Respondent, ) ) S179181 v. ) ) Riverside County MICHAEL RAY BURGENER, ) Super. Ct. No. CR 18088

)

Defendant and Appellant. ) ____________________________________)

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING THE COURT:

The opinion in this case, filed on August 11, 2016, and appearing at 1 Cal.5th 461, is modified as follows:

The citation following the first sentence of the final paragraph on page 474 of 1 Cal.5th, which currently reads “(See People v. Engram (2010) 50 Cal.4th 1131, 1161 [116 Cal.Rptr.3d 762, 240 P.3d 237] [„a statute must be construed, if reasonably possible, in a manner that avoids a serious constitutional question‟].)” is replaced with the following: (See Loeffler v. Target Corp. (2014) 58 Cal.4th 1081, 1102 [“we avoid resolving constitutional questions if the issue may be resolved on narrower grounds”].)

This modification does not affect the judgment.

The petition for rehearing is denied.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Burgener
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 13, 2016
Docket Number: S179181M
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.