History
  • No items yet
midpage
Kevin Klik v. Verizon Virginia, Inc.
16-1395
| 4th Cir. | Oct 12, 2016
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Melvin E. Williams, MEL WILLIAMS PLC, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellant. Betty S.W. Graumlich, REED SMITH LLP, Richmond, Virginia; Kim M. Watterson, REED SMITH LLP, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

Kevin C. Klik appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ summary judgment motion and denying Klik’s summary judgment motion on Klik’s disability discrimination claims, brought pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 to 12213 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Klik v. Verizon Va., Inc., No. 6:15-cv-00002-NKM-JCH (W.D. Va. Mar. 8, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Kevin Klik v. Verizon Virginia, Inc.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Oct 12, 2016
Docket Number: 16-1395
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.