History
  • No items yet
midpage
PISKORZ, EDWARD A. v. PISKORZ, MARILYN
CA 10-01598
| N.Y. App. Div. | Feb 10, 2011
|
Check Treatment

*1 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 1502

CA 10-01598

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., LINDLEY, SCONIERS, GREEN, AND GORSKI, JJ. EDWARD A. PISKORZ, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MARILYN PISKORZ, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

ZARCONE ASSOCIATES, PLLC, AMHERST (KELLY V. ZARCONE OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

SHARON ANSCOMBE OSGOOD, BUFFALO, FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Janice M.

Rosa, J.), entered March 9, 2010, which granted defendant’s motion to enter a stipulated qualified domestic relations order.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: On this appeal by plaintiff from a qualified domestic relations order (QDRO), we note that no appeal lies as of right from such an order ( see Irato v Irato , 288 AD2d 952). Nevertheless, inasmuch as plaintiff “raised timely objections prior to the entry of the QDRO and thereby preserved a record for our review,” we treat the notice of appeal as an application for leave to appeal and grant the application ( id. at 952). Upon considering the merits of plaintiff’s contention, we affirm the order.

Entered: February 10, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan

Clerk of the Court

Case Details

Case Name: PISKORZ, EDWARD A. v. PISKORZ, MARILYN
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Feb 10, 2011
Docket Number: CA 10-01598
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.