History
  • No items yet
midpage
VERIZON NEW YORK, INC. v. LABARGE BROTHERS COMPANY, INC.
CA 10-01102
| N.Y. App. Div. | Feb 10, 2011
|
Check Treatment

*1 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 89

CA 10-01102

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. VERIZON NEW YORK, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

V ORDER LABARGE BROTHERS CO., INC. AND LABARGE

COMPANIES, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

(APPEAL NO. 3.)

EDWARD C. COSGROVE, BUFFALO (JAMES C. COSGROVE OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

SMITH, SOVIK, KENDRICK & SUGNET, P.C., SYRACUSE (ANN MAGNARELLI ALEXANDER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Deborah H. Karalunas, J.), entered August 6, 2009. The order, among other things, granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff’s complaint and denied plaintiff’s cross motion for leave to amend the complaint to add Suburban Pipeline Co., Inc. as a defendant.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs ( see Verizon New York, Inc. v LaBarge Bros. Co., Inc . [appeal No. 1], ___ AD3d ___ [Feb. 10, 2011]). Entered: February 10, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan

Clerk of the Court

Case Details

Case Name: VERIZON NEW YORK, INC. v. LABARGE BROTHERS COMPANY, INC.
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Feb 10, 2011
Docket Number: CA 10-01102
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.