History
  • No items yet
midpage
CUNNINGHAM, III, EDWARD v. LECHASE CONSTRUCTION
CA 11-00958
| N.Y. App. Div. | Dec 23, 2011
|
Check Treatment
Case Information

*1 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 1078

CA 11-00958

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, GREEN, AND GORSKI, JJ. EDWARD CUNNINGHAM, III, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

V ORDER LECHASE CONSTRUCTION, FREDERICO

WRECKING CO., INC., AND FRIENDS OF FINGER

LAKES PERFORMING ARTS CENTER, INC.,

DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. --------------------------------------------

FREDERICO WRECKING CO., INC., THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

V

CONTOUR ERECTION AND SIDING SYSTEMS, INC.,

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

--------------------------------------------

LECHASE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, LLC AND

FRIENDS OF FINGER LAKES PERFORMING ARTS

CENTER, INC., THIRD-PARTY

PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

V

CONTOUR ERECTION AND SIDING SYSTEMS, INC.,

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. MAXWELL MURPHY, LLC, BUFFALO (ALAN D. VOOS OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

BROWN & TARANTINO, LLC, BUFFALO (ANN M. CAMPBELL OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS. MACKENZIE HUGHES LLP, SYRACUSE (JENNIFER P. WILLIAMS OF COUNSEL), FOR THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John A.

Michalek, J.), entered November 24, 2010 in a personal injury action. The order, inter alia, denied the motion of plaintiff for partial summary judgment on liability pursuant to Labor Law § 240 (1), granted those parts of the motions of defendants-third-party plaintiffs and third-party defendant seeking summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and granted that part of the motion of third-party defendant seeking summary judgment dismissing the third-party

-2- 1078 CA 11-00958 complaints.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by denying those parts of the motions of defendants-third-party plaintiffs and third-party defendant seeking summary judgment dismissing the Labor Law § 240 (1) claim and the Labor Law § 241 (6) claim to the extent that it is premised on a violation of 12 NYCRR 23-3.3 (h), reinstating those claims and denying that part of the motion of third-party defendant seeking summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaints and reinstating the third-party complaints, and as modified the order is affirmed without costs ( see Charney v LeChase Constr ., ___ AD3d ___ [Dec. 23, 2011]). Entered: December 23, 2011 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court

Case Details

Case Name: CUNNINGHAM, III, EDWARD v. LECHASE CONSTRUCTION
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Dec 23, 2011
Docket Number: CA 11-00958
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.