History
  • No items yet
midpage
SHIELDS, MICHAEL L.T. v. TOWERY, CRYSTAL
91 A.D.3d 1343
| N.Y. App. Div. | 2012
|
Check Treatment

*1 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 157

CAF 11-00826

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, SCONIERS, GORSKI, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. IN THE MATTER OF MICHAEL L.T. SHIELDS, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CRYSTAL TOWERY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

LABIN & BUFFOMANTE, WILLIAMSVILLE (CLAYTON J. LENHARDT OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

CARNEY & GIALLANZA, BUFFALO (JASON R. DIPASQUALE OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Paul G.

Buchanan, J.), entered August 17, 2010 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4. The order denied the objection of respondent to the order of the Support Magistrate.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: In this proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, respondent mother appeals from an order denying her objection to the order of the Support Magistrate that modified a prior order by, inter alia, reducing the weekly child support obligation of petitioner father and his share of child care and unreimbursed health- related expenses. We affirm. The father presented evidence that his income from employment decreased as the result of an involuntary reduction in his overtime hours. The Support Magistrate’s determination that his loss of income was sufficiently substantial to warrant a downward modification of his child support obligation is entitled to great deference ( see generally Matter of Manocchio v Manocchio , 16 AD3d 1126, 1128). Contrary to the mother’s contention, moreover, the Support Magistrate properly exercised her discretion in concluding that the amount of rental income calculated at the time of the prior order constituted the most reliable amount to be imputed to the father for purposes of the instant proceeding ( see Matter of Niagara County Dept. of Social Servs. v Hueber , 89 AD3d 1440; see generally Matter of Gravenese v Marchese , 57 AD3d 992, 993).

Entered: January 31, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court

Case Details

Case Name: SHIELDS, MICHAEL L.T. v. TOWERY, CRYSTAL
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jan 31, 2012
Citation: 91 A.D.3d 1343
Docket Number: CAF 11-00826
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.