32:T548,{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"Legislation","name":"M., AUSTIN, MTR. OF, CAF 11-01522","datePublished":"2012-06-08","legislationDate":"2012-06-08","citation":"M., AUSTIN, MTR. OF, No. CAF 11-01522 (N.Y. App. Div. Jun 8, 2012)","countryOfOrigin":"USA","jurisdiction":"Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York","description":"Read the full text of M., AUSTIN, MTR. OF (M., AUSTIN, MTR. OF, No. CAF 11-01522 (N.Y. App. Div. Jun 8, 2012)). This legal opinion, filed in 2012-06-08, from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York discusses important legal matters. Access this case and related legal documents on Midpage, an AI-powered legal research platform.","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://app.midpage.ai/document/m-austin-mtr-of--4086023"},"author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Midpage"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Midpage"},"url":"https://app.midpage.ai/document/m-austin-mtr-of--4086023","isPartOf":{"@type":"WebSite","name":"Midpage","url":"https://app.midpage.ai"},"inLanguage":"en","keywords":"legal, opinion, document, research, midpage, M., AUSTIN, MTR. OF, Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, M., AUSTIN, MTR. OF, No. CAF 11-01522 (N.Y. App. Div. Jun 8, 2012)","isAccessibleForFree":true,"isFamilyFriendly":true}34:T551,

Case Information

IN THE MATTER OF AUSTIN M. MONROE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, PETITIONER-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

CAF 11-01522

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

June 8, 2012

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND SCONIERS, JJ.

636

ORDER

WILLIAM K. TAYLOR, COUNTY ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (CAROL L. EISENMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

TANYA CONLEY, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, ROCHESTER, FOR AUSTIN M.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Monroe County (Dandrea L. Ruhlmann, J.), entered July 6, 2011. The order, among other things, adjudged that petitioner did not engage in reasonable efforts to effectuate the adoption of Austin M.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Entered: June 8, 2012

Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court