*1 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 236

CA 11-01892

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, FAHEY, CARNI, AND SCONIERS, JJ. JAMES K. HEIDT, GUARDIAN AD LITEM OF SETH

KELLY, AN INFANT UNDER THE AGE OF 10 YEARS,

PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

V ORDER ROME MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, GARY C. TART, M.D.,

PEDIATRIC & ADOLESCENT MEDICAL ASSOCIATES, P.C.,

STEPHEN REICHARD, D.O., ROME RADIOLOGICAL

ASSOCIATES, P.C., CROUSE-IRVING MEMORIAL

HOSPITAL, ALLAN S. CUNNINGHAM, M.D., NETHI LORLERTRATNA, M.D., KRISTEN M. CHRISTIAN, M.D.,

H. SHIN, M.D., LOUISE A. PRINCE, M.D., THERESA

AMIGO, M.D., MADISON COUNTY MEDICAL CARE, DOING

BUSINESS AS CAMDEN MEDICAL CARE, RONALD EDWARD

FEMIA, M.D., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS,

ET AL., DEFENDANT.

BURKE, SCOLAMIERO, MORTATI & HURD, LLP, ALBANY (JEFFREY HURD OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT ROME MEMORIAL HOSPITAL.

SMITH, SOVIK, KENDRICK & SUGNET, P.C., SYRACUSE (LAURENCE F. SOVIK OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS GARY C. TART, M.D. AND PEDIATRIC & ADOLESCENT MEDICAL ASSOCIATES, P.C. LEVENE, GOULDIN & THOMPSON, LLP, BINGHAMTON (JOHN J. POLLACK OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS STEPHEN REICHARD, D.O., RONALD EDWARD FEMIA, M.D., AND ROME RADIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES, P.C.

MACKENZIE HUGHES, LLP, SYRACUSE (STEPHEN T. HELMER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS CROUSE-IRVING MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, NETHI LORLERTRATNA, M.D., KRISTEN M. CHRISTIAN, M.D., AND H. SHIN, M.D. SUGARMAN LAW FIRM, LLP, SYRACUSE (JOSHUA M. GILLETTE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT ALLAN S. CUNNINGHAM, M.D.

GALE GALE & HUNT, LLC, SYRACUSE (MAX D. GALE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT LOUISE A. PRINCE, M.D.

ASWAD & INGRAHAM, BINGHAMTON (JAMES F. MORAN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS THERESA AMIGO, M.D. AND MADISON COUNTY MEDICAL CARE, DOING BUSINESS AS CAMDEN MEDICAL CARE.

-2- 236 CA 11-01892 BOTTAR LEONE, PLLC, SYRACUSE (MICHAEL A. BOTTAR OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

Appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (James P. Murphy, J.), entered May 2, 2011. The order, inter alia, denied the motions of defendants to dismiss the complaint for failure to prosecute.