History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Baez
143 A.D.3d 474
| N.Y. App. Div. | 2016
|
Check Treatment
People v Baez (2016 NY Slip Op 06545)
People v Baez
2016 NY Slip Op 06545
Decided on October 6, 2016
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on October 6, 2016
Renwick, J.P., Richter, Manzanet-Daniels, Feinman, Kapnick, JJ.

2462N/13 1832 3616/12 1831

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent, —

v

Candido Baez, Defendant-Appellant.




Richard M. Greenberg, Office of the Appellate Defender, New York (Tomoeh Murakami Tse of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Yan Slavinskiy of counsel), for respondent.



An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Ronald A. Zweibel, J.), rendered February 20, 2014,

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

ENTERED: OCTOBER 6, 2016

CLERK

Counsel for appellant is referred to

§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate

Division, First Department.



Case Details

Case Name: People v. Baez
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Oct 6, 2016
Citation: 143 A.D.3d 474
Docket Number: 2462N/13 1832 3616/12 1831
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.