History
  • No items yet
midpage
Wright, II v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
16-615
Fed. Cl.
Oct 5, 2016
Check Treatment
Docket
Case Information

*1 In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 16-615V Filed: July 20, 2016

UNPUBLISHED * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

GILMORE WRIGHT, II, *

* Petitioner, * Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; v. * Influenza (“Flu”); Shoulder Injury

* Related to Vaccine Administration SECRETARY OF HEALTH * (“SIRVA”); Special Processing Unit AND HUMAN SERVICES, * (“SPU”)

* Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Paul Brazil, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for petitioner.

Voris Johnson, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT [1]

Dorsey

, Chief Special Master:

On May 25, 2016, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. , [2] (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered injuries including left rotator cuff syndrome as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered in his left deltoid on November 7, 2014. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On July 18, 2016, respondent filed her Rule 4(c) report in which she concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, respondent agrees that petitioner’s alleged injury is consistent with a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”). Id. at 3. Respondent further agrees that petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Vaccine Act. Id.

*2 In view of respondent’s concession and the evidence before me, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey

Nora Beth Dorsey

Chief Special Master

2

[1] Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

[2] National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).

Case Details

Case Name: Wright, II v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Court Name: United States Court of Federal Claims
Date Published: Oct 5, 2016
Docket Number: 16-615
Court Abbreviation: Fed. Cl.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.