History
  • No items yet
midpage
City of Bismarck v. Pederson
2016 ND 191
| N.D. | 2016
|
Check Treatment

Filed 10/4/16 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2016 ND 191

City of Bismarck, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Tiffany Pederson, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20160021

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable James S. Hill, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Jason J. Hammes, City Prosecutor, P.O. Box 5503, Bismarck, ND 58506-

5503, for plaintiff and appellee.

Dan L. Herbel, The Regency Business Center, 3333 East Broadway Avenue, Suite 1205, Bismarck, ND 58501, for defendant and appellant.

City of Bismarck v. Pederson

No. 20160021

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Tiffany Pederson appealed from a criminal judgment for actual physical control of a motor vehicle while under the influence entered upon a conditional guilty plea after the district court denied her motion to suppress.  On appeal, Pederson argues the district court erred in denying her motion to suppress, contending the initial contact made by the officer constituted an illegal seizure.  We conclude the district court’s decision is not contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence.  We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Lisa Fair McEvers

Daniel J. Crothers

Dale V. Sandstrom

Case Details

Case Name: City of Bismarck v. Pederson
Court Name: North Dakota Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 4, 2016
Citation: 2016 ND 191
Docket Number: 20160021
Court Abbreviation: N.D.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.