History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Charles Davis
669 F. App'x 151
| 4th Cir. | 2016
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles A. Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina; Jenny Grus Sugar, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

Charles A. Davis appeals the district court’s order denying his Rule 60(b) motion and various other motions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Davis, No. 5:11-cr-00032-RLV-DSC-1 (W.D.N.C. June 13, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Charles Davis
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Oct 4, 2016
Citation: 669 F. App'x 151
Docket Number: 16-6837
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.