History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. Timothy Howell
16-6854
| 4th Cir. | Oct 4, 2016
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Timothy Brian Howell, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Blue Boggs, Robert Michael Hamilton, Michael Francis Joseph, Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

Timothy Brian Howell appeals the district court’s order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of sentence based on Amendment 782 to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. Howell claims that the district court did not adequately explain why it declined to order a larger sentence reduction pursuant to Amendment 782. Having reviewed the record, we find that the district court sufficiently explained its rationale for the sentence it imposed. We therefore affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. Timothy Howell
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Oct 4, 2016
Docket Number: 16-6854
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.