History
  • No items yet
midpage
In Re: Velocys Corp.
16-1294
| Fed. Cir. | Oct 4, 2016
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ IN RE: VELOCYS CORP., Appellant ______________________ 2016-1294 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 11/763,336.

______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ F RANK R OSENBERG , San Francisco, CA, argued for ap- pellant.

K AKOLI C APRIHAN , Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by T HOMAS W. K RAUSE , F ARHEENA Y ASMEEN R ASHEED .

______________________

T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (O’M ALLEY , B RYSON , and S TOLL , Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT October 4, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case Details

Case Name: In Re: Velocys Corp.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Date Published: Oct 4, 2016
Docket Number: 16-1294
Court Abbreviation: Fed. Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.