History
  • No items yet
midpage
Calvin Hammock v. NASA Headquarters
16-1301
| 8th Cir. | Oct 4, 2016
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM.

*2 Calvin Hammock appeals after the district court dismissed his pro se [1] complaint. Upon careful review, we find no reason to reverse the dismissal order because, among other reasons, we agree with the district court that Hammock failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. See Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009); Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007); Kelly v. City of Omaha, 813 F.3d 1070, 1075 (8th Cir. 2016) (de novo review). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

[1] The Honorable John A. Jarvey, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa. -2-

Case Details

Case Name: Calvin Hammock v. NASA Headquarters
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Date Published: Oct 4, 2016
Docket Number: 16-1301
Court Abbreviation: 8th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.