History
  • No items yet
midpage
Daramus Jones v. Freda Thornton
16-1705
| 4th Cir. | Oct 3, 2016
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daramus Jones, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

Daramus Jones appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jones v. Thornton, No. 1:16-cv-00576-JCC-IDD (E.D. Va. June 6, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Daramus Jones v. Freda Thornton
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Oct 3, 2016
Docket Number: 16-1705
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.