History
  • No items yet
midpage
Marguerite Edwards v. Thomas Vilsak
16-1811
4th Cir.
Oct 3, 2016
Check Treatment
Docket

*1 Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marguerite E. Edwards, Appellant Pro Se. Jane Elizabeth Andersen, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Jakarra Jenise Jones, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. *2 PER CURIAM:

Marguerite E. Edwards appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendant in her civil action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012), and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 621-34 (West 2008 & Supp. 2016). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Edwards v. Vilsak, No. 8:15-cv-01823-DKC (D. Md. July 7, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Marguerite Edwards v. Thomas Vilsak
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Oct 3, 2016
Docket Number: 16-1811
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.