Case Information

*1 Dismiss and Opinion Filed October 23, 2015

In The

No. 05-15-01081-CV

TRENT GRIFFIN AND/OR ALL OCCUPANTS OF 724 MEANDERING DRIVE, CEDAR HILL, TEXAS 75104, Appellants

AMERICAN HOMES 4 RENT PROPERTIES EIGHT, LLC A DELAWARE LIMITED

LIABILITY COMPANY, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-15-03986-B MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Lang-Miers, and Justice Stoddart

Opinion by Chief Justice Wright

Before this Court are appellee’s motion to dismiss as moot this appeal from the trial court’s judgment of possession in a forcible detainer suit and appellants’ opposition to the motion. Appellee asserts this appeal has become moot because it is now in possession of the property at issue. Appellee notes it was awarded judgment of possession against appellants on August 26, 2015. Appellant did not supersede enforcement of the judgment, and appellee took possession of the property “on or around September 11, 2015” following execution of a writ of possession.

A case becomes moot if, at any stage of the proceedings, a controversy ceases to exist between the parties. See Williams v. Lara , 52 S.W.3d 171, 184 (Tex. 2001). The only issue in a *2 forcible detainer case is the right to actual possession of property. See Marshall v. Housing Auth’y of City of San Antonio , 198 S.W.3d 782, 787 (Tex. 2006) (citing former Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 746, now Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 510.3(e)). If the trial court renders judgment in favor of the plaintiff, the trial court must render judgment for possession of the property, costs, any delinquent rent, and attorney’s fees if recoverable by law. T EX . R. C IV . P. 510.8(b). When a writ of possession has been executed following the filing of an appeal and possession is no longer an issue, the appeal in a forcible detainer case becomes moot unless the appellant holds and asserts a meritorious claim of right to current, actual possession of the property or damages or attorney’s fees remain at issue. See Daftary v. Prestonwood Mkt. Square, Ltd. , 399 S.W.3d 708, 711 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2013, no pet.) (citing former Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 752, no Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 510.8(b)).

Appellants do not assert in their opposition to the motion a potentially meritorious claim of right to current, actual possession of the property, and the trial court did not award attorney’s fees or damages. Thus, no actual controversy between the parties remains. We grant appellee’s motion to dismiss the case as moot, vacate the trial court’s judgment, and dismiss the case. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.3(a); Marshall , 198 S.W.3d at 790.

151081F.P05

/Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE *3 JUDGMENT

TRENT GRIFFIN AND/OR ALL On Appeal from the County Court at Law OCCUPANTS OF 724 MEANDERING No. 2, Dallas County, Texas DRIVE, CEDAR HILL, TEXAS 75104, Trial Court Cause No. CC-15-03986-B. Appellants Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright.

Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart No. 05-15-01081-CV V. participating.

AMERICAN HOMES 4 RENT

PROPERTIES EIGHT, LLC A

DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY

COMPANY, Appellee

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we VACATE the trial court’s judgment and DISMISS the case.

We ORDER that appellee American Homes 4 Rent Properties Eight recover its costs, if any, of this appeal from appellant Trent Griffin and/or all occupants of 724 Meandering Drive, Cedar Hill, Texas 75104.

Judgment entered October 23, 2015.