History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Cindy Camargo
03-14-00089-CR
| Tex. App. | Dec 23, 2015
|
Check Treatment
Case Information

*0 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 12/23/2015 9:28:33 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk No. 03-14-00089-CR THIRD COURT OF APPEALS 12/23/2015 9:28:33 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE AUSTIN, TEXAS 03-14-00089-CR *1 ACCEPTED [8354697] CLERK IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS, AT AUSTIN The State of Texas

Appellant

v.

Cindy Camargo

Appellee

On Appeal In Case Number D-1-DC-12-206451 from the 427th District

Court of Travis County, the Hon. Jim Coronado, Judge Presiding Third Supplemental Argument & Authorities TO THE HONORABLE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS:

COMES NOW, Cindy Camargo, Appellee in the above styled and numbered cause, by and through David A. Schulman and

John G. Jasuta, her undersigned attorneys of record, and

respectfully files this “Third Supplemental Argument &

Authorities,” and would show the Court that, on December 16,

2015, in State v. Villarreal , the Court of Criminal Appeals

*2 dismissed the State’s motion for rehearing as having been

improvidently granted. Thus, the Court’s original decision, State

v. Villarreal , PD-0306-14 (Tex.Cr.App.; November 26, 2014, is

now final. In its original opinion, the Court of Criminal Appeals

held that the non-consensual search of a defendant’s blood

conducted pursuant to the mandatory-blood-draw and

implied-consent provisions in the Transportation Code,

undertaken in the absence of a warrant or any applicable

exception to the warrant requirement, violated the Fourth

Amendment. See Villarreal , slip at 49.

Appellee respectfully reiterates her suggestion that this case is controlled by the Court’s original opinion in Villarreal .

Accordingly, because the State did not have a warrant and none

of the recognized exceptions apply, the trial court’s suppression

order is correct.

Prayer

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Cindy Camargo, Appellee in the above styled and numbered cause respectfully

prays that this Honorable Court will affirm the orders of the court

below.

Respectfully submitted,

______________________________ ______________________________

John G. Jasuta David A. Schulman

Attorney at Law Attorney at Law

State Bar No. 10592300 State Bar Card No. 17833400

lawyer1@johnjasuta.com zdrdavida@davidschulman.com

1801 East 51st Street, Suite 365-474 Austin, Texas 78723

Tel. 512-474-4747

Fax: 512-532-6282 Attorneys for Cindy Camargo Certificate of Compliance and Delivery This is to certify that: (1) this document, created using WordPerfect™ X7 software, contains 307 words, excluding those

items permitted by Rule 9.4 (i)(1), Tex.R.App.Pro., and complies

with Rules 9.4 (i)(2)(B) and 9.4 (i)(3), Tex.R.App.Pro.; and (2) on

November 17, 2014, a true and correct copy of the above and

foregoing “Third Supplemental Argument & Authorities” was

transmitted via the eService function on the State’s eFiling portal,

to Angie Creasy (angie.creasy@co.travis.tx.us), counsel of record

for the State of Texas.

______________________________________ David A. Schulman

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Cindy Camargo
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Dec 23, 2015
Docket Number: 03-14-00089-CR
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.