History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bernard Morello v. State
03-15-00428-CV
| Tex. App. | Nov 13, 2015
|
Check Treatment
Case Information

*0 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 11/13/2015 11:09:51 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk THIRD COURT OF APPEALS 11/13/2015 11:09:51 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE 03-15-000428-cv AUSTIN, TEXAS *1 ACCEPTED [7816354] CLERK

NO. 03-15-00428-CV

________________________________________________________________________

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN

________________________________________________________________________

BERNARD MORELLO, Appellant ,

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee .

_______________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from Cause No. D-1-GV-06-000627 353 RD Judicial District Court, Austin, Texas The Honorable Rhonda Hurley ________________________________________________________________________

JURANEK LAW FIRM, PLLC, AND JAMES JURANEK’S PARTIALLY UNOPPOSED MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL FOR BERNARD MORELLO AND TO SUBSITTUTE LAPEZE & JOHNS, PLLC AS LEAD COUNSEL

________________________________________________________________________

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:

The Juranek Law Firm, PLLC and James Juranek (collectively “Movants”) file this partially unopposed motion to withdraw as lead counsel for Appellant Bernard

Morello, and in support thereof would respectfully show the Court the following:

1. Basis for motion . Movants file this Motion to withdraw from representation of this appeal under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 6.5.

2. Withdrawal with Substitution of Counsel . This Motion is for

withdrawal with substitution of counsel. Lapeze & Johns, PLLC, and Keith Lapeze,

current co-counsel for Appellant, will continue acting as counsel for Appellant.

3. Good cause for withdrawal . The rules governing withdrawal require a

showing of “good cause,” and courts have looked to the grounds identified in Texas

Disciplinary Rule 1.15 for the bases for withdrawal. See In re A.R ., 236 S.W.3d 460, 474

(Tex. App.—Dallas 2007, no pet.). Subsection (b) of Disciplinary Rule 1.15 lists specific

instances under which an attorney may seek to withdraw. Included among those

instances are where “the client fails substantially to fulfill an obligation to the lawyer

regarding the lawyer’s services, including an obligation to pay the lawyer’s fee as agreed,

and has been given reasonable warning that the lawyer will withdraw unless the

obligation is fulfilled.” T EX . D ISCIPLINARY R. P ROF ’ L C ONDUCT , § 1.15(b)(5), reprinted

in T EX . G OV ’ T C ODE A NN , tit. 2, subtit. G, app. A (Vernon 1998).

Movants undertook representation of Appellant on good faith and without requiring payment of a retainer; however, Movants’ fees and expenses have yet to be

paid. Movants spoke with Appellant approximately 3 weeks prior to filing this motion

and advised that unless payment was made, Movants would be forced to withdraw from

the case. To date, Movants’ have not been paid their legal fees or expenses incurred to

date on this appeal. Accordingly, Movants submit that good cause exists to permit their

withdrawal as counsel in this matter. See In re Daniels , 138 S.W.3d 31, 35 (Tex. App.—

San Antonio 2004, orig. proceeding) (finding that counsel established good cause to

withdraw where client failed to pay outstanding legal fees).

4. Client Notification . Appellant has been notified via first class mail,

certified mail, and hand delivery of the right to object to the relief sought in this motion.

Such notice has been sent to the following last known address of Appellant: Bernard J.

Morello, 5100 San Felipe, Unit 78E, Houston, TX 77056.

Respectfully submitted, JURANEK LAW FIRM, PLLC ______________________ By: JAMES JURANEK State Bar No. 24026888 111 N. Ennis Houston, Texas 77003 (713) 229-0699 (888) 626-6596 (fax) james@jjfirm.com C ERTIFICATE OF C ONFERENCE The undersigned contact Appellant’s counsel (Craig Pritzlaff) about the contents of this motion and the relief requested. Mr. Pritzlaff advised that Appellee is unopposed

to the relief sought. Appellant has not indicated whether he opposes Movants’

withdrawal in this matter.

__________________________ James Juranek *4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing instrument was forwarded to Appellees’ Counsel via the electronic filing manager pursuant to Texas Rule

of Appellate Procedure 9.2, on this 13th day of November, 2015.

Lead Counsel for Appellees

Craig J. Pritzlaff

Assistant Attorney General

P.O. Box 12548, MC-066

Austin, TX 78711

512.320.0911 (Fax)

_____________________________ James Juranek

Case Details

Case Name: Bernard Morello v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Nov 13, 2015
Docket Number: 03-15-00428-CV
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.