Case Information
*1 Affirmed and Opinion Filed November 4, 2015
In The No. 05-14-01031-CR No. 05-14-01032-CR No. 05-14-01033-CR DANIEL DEANTHONY FELDER, JR., Appellant V.
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 5 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. F14-52047-L, F14-52048-L, F14-52049-L MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Lang, Evans, and Whitehill Opinion by Justice Whitehill
Daniel DeAnthony Felder, Jr. waived a jury and pleaded guilty to three offenses of aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon. See T EX . P ENAL C ODE A NN . § 29.03(a)(2) (West 2011). The trial court assessed punishment at fifteen years’ imprisonment in each case.
On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807, 811–12 *2 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response. See Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (identifying duties of appellate courts and counsel in Anders cases).
We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree the appeals are frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeals.
Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s judgments.
Do Not Publish
T EX . R. A PP . P. 47
141031F.P05
/Bill Whitehill/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE *3 Judgment entered November 4, 2015 *4 Judgment entered November 4, 2015. *5 Judgment entered November 4, 2015.
