History
  • No items yet
midpage
David Rogers v. Gregorio "Greg" Casar
03-15-00505-CV
| Tex. App. | Sep 14, 2015
|
Check Treatment
Case Information

*0 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 9/14/2015 4:34:37 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk NO. 03-15-00505-CV THIRD COURT OF APPEALS 9/14/2015 4:34:37 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE AUSTIN, TEXAS 03-15-00505-CV *1 ACCEPTED [6918209] CLERK IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT AUSTIN

LAURA PRESSLEY, APPELLANT VS.

GREGORIO “GREG” CASAR, APPELLEE UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR CONSOLIDATION & CLARIFICATION OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:

Now comes David Rogers, Appellant and moves this court to consolidate the following cases: 03-15-00368-CV Laura Pressley v. Gregorio “Greg” Casar

and 03-15-00505-CV Laura Pressley v. Gregorio “Greg” Casar. The two cases

are appropriate for consolidation for the following reasons:

1. The two cases involve common questions of fact because both arise from

the same factual situation; namely, the election for the office of Austin City

Council, District 4 held on December 16, 2014 and canvassed on December 30,

2014. In addition, both cases appeal judgments from Travis County District Court

case D-1-GN-15-000374. The first appeal involves a judgment against Pressley

in the election contest, subsequently amended to include a later judgment for

sanctions against Pressley. The second appeals involves a judgment for

sanctions against Pressley’s counsel

2. Under Texas Election Code 232.015, the Court of Appeals MAY

accelerate the appeal in a contest of a general election. 03-15-00368-CV has

been denominated as an accelerated appeal by Appellant, but no order from this

Court or the trial court has been issued denominating that appeal or this appeal

or the trial as accelerated. We therefore seek clarification of the schedule, and

an order entered based on normal application of rules.

3. Judicial convenience and economy will be promoted by consolidation of

the actions. Consolidation will result in one appeal. This will save time and avoid

unnecessary costs and duplication of effort for the Appellants, the Appellees, and

this Court.

PRAYER

For these reasons, David Rogers requests that this court grant his motion for consolidation and clarification of the scheduling order.

Respectfully submitted, ___ 1201 Spyglass Drive, Suite 100 firm@darogerslaw.com CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE Please be advised that the undersigned has conferred with opposing counsel on September 14, 2015 regarding this motion, and the parties are

unopposed.

__ /s/ David Rogers _____________ David Rogers CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE This is to certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing has been served by efile and/or facsimile to the following persons on this 14th

day of September 2015.

Mark Cohen

SBN: 04508400

805 W. 10 th Street, Suite 100

Austin, Texas 78701

(512) 474-4424

(512) 472-5444 fax

mark@cohenlegalservices.com

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT

LAURA PRESSLEY

Kurt Kuhn

SBN: 24002433

KUHN HOBBS PLLC

3307 Northland Drive, # 310

Austin, Texas 78731

(512) 476-6002 fax

kurt@KuhnHobbs.com

Charles ‘Chuck’ Herring, Jr.

Herring & Irwin, L.L.P

1411 West Avenue, Suite 100

(512) 519-7580 fax

cherring@herring-irwin.com

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE

GREGORIO “GREG” CASAR

__ _____________

Case Details

Case Name: David Rogers v. Gregorio "Greg" Casar
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Sep 14, 2015
Docket Number: 03-15-00505-CV
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.