History
  • No items yet
midpage
David Wayne Stokes, Jr. v. State
03-15-00479-CR
| Tex. App. | Sep 16, 2015
|
Check Treatment
Case Information

*0 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 9/16/2015 11:15:29 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk NO. 03-15-00478-CR THIRD COURT OF APPEALS 9/16/2015 11:15:29 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE AUSTIN, TEXAS 03-15-00478-CR *1 ACCEPTED [6948524] CLERK

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AT AUSTIN, TEXAS

****************

DAVID WAYNE STOKES

VS.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

****************

ON APPEAL FROM THE

264 th JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

BELL COUNTY, TEXAS

CAUSE NO. 74,268

*********

STATE’S BRIEF

*********

HENRY GARZA

P.O. Box 540

Belton, Texas 76513

DistrictAttorney@co.bell.tx.us

ATTORNEYS FOR THE STATE

i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Authorities ................................................................................................................. ii

Appellant’s Brief ......................................................................................................................... 1

Prayer ............................................................................................................................................ 2

Certificate of Compliance with Rule 9 ................................................................................. 2

Certificate of Service ................................................................................................................ 3

ii

TABLE OF AUTHORITIES

Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738

87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967) ................................................................................................... 1

Gainous v. State , 436 S.W.2d 137

(Tex.Cr.App.1969) ........................................................................................................ 1

iii

APPELLANT'S BRIEF

After a review of the record, the Appellant's counsel concludes that the

appeal is frivolous and that there are no arguable points of error (Appellant’s

Brief, pp. 1, 7).

Wherefore, Premises Considered, the State of Texas prays that the

decision of the Trial Court be affirmed, Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87

S.Ct. 1396 (1967); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 Tex.Cr.App.1969).

PRAYER

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, and since no reversible

error is shown, the State respectfully prays that this Court affirm the

conviction.

Respectfully submitted,

HENRY L. GARZA

/s/ Bob D. Odom

BOB D. ODOM

Assistant District Attorney

P. O. Box 540

Belton, Texas 76513

Bar I.D. # 15200000

DistrictAttorney@co.bell.tx.us

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH RULE 9

This is to certify that the State’s Brief is in compliance with Rule 9 of the

Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure and that portion which must be included

under Rule 9.4(i)(1) contains 369 words.

/s/ Bob D. Odom

*6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a true and correct copy of the State's Brief has

been sent by e-service to the e-mail address: Ken_Mahaffey@yahoo.com,

provided by the Attorney of Record, Ken Mahaffey, on this the 16 th day of

September, 2015.

HENRY L. GARZA

/s/ Bob D. Odom

P. O. Box 540

Belton, Texas 76513

Bar I.D. # 15200000

DistrictAttorney@co.bell.tx.us

[3]

Case Details

Case Name: David Wayne Stokes, Jr. v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Sep 16, 2015
Docket Number: 03-15-00479-CR
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.