Case Information
*1 CAUSE NO. 03-14-00747-CV
DARRELL I. HARPEK
V.
STATE OF TEXAS COMMISSION ON JAIL STANDARDS. ET AL.
IN THE COURT OF APPREASL COURT OF APPEASL
JEPTrey D. Kyle
THIRD JUDICIAL DISFLECT
SITTINE IN AUSTIN. TEXAS
EXPLAISION
TO THE CLEAR'S OFFICE:
-
Now comes APPELlunt, Darrell J. Hurter motionins the court to extend the time to File APPELlunt's brief against APPELlees State OF Texas Commission on Juil Standards. et al., for Entewment.
-
The reasons for motion for extension is because APPELlees, State of Texas Commission on Juil Standards et al., entrubted APPELlunt, Darrell J. Hurter. Knowing the Court(s) would be powerless to prosecute them for being civil rights violators when they can have corruption makes it's living off a system that consist of being on tuxpvers, Paviail infinities apPEllunt's civil and constitutional rights to work and liberty for lilies employment discrimination complaints. Initially, elucins apPEellunt in un uncomerom'sins situation.
-
Even though the infraction does constitute invidious discriminatoes especially because it involves prejudice or sororivins, this would actually mean it would not make a difference whether or not apPEllunt files his brief. When the jurisdiction for proceedings civil rights violators would either be limitless or in conflict.
-
In violation of the Racketeer Influenced and correct pronunciation, Act. in violation of the universal Declaration of Humunfists. In violation of the Whistleblower Protection Act. in violation of the Texas Commission on Humun Rishs Act. in violation of the Federal Tort claims Act. in violation of the American Disabilities Act. and in violation of the Civil Rishs Act of 1964, as amended.
-
The "Kins can Do No Wrens" never had un existence in the United States, even though correction and insurcient evidence are overloaded at us being Puriters in crimes. When can't be prescuted by the same system the rurs them to infinite urrellunt's civil and constitutional rights, and more likely than not entitles apPEllunt to extend the time in which to File apPEellunt's brief, even though bribery is the motive, for this adboutase of apPEellunt for not being represented by causer.
*2
WHEREFORE. APPELLIAN DURIGII J. HURGER. PRUEY tLSI hE he jusily entitled to liberty and prosperity on this uprool.
Very Truly Yours, Dunell G. Haraw Durell J. Hurger Prose Inmute No. 1957724 D. B. Ellis unit
1647 FM 440 Huntsville. Texas 77343
Conflicution of Service
Apeallant, Durrell J. Hurger. does hereby certify that the Motion is true and correct for processins on or uround Tuesday the 8 th day of seerentor 2015. in uecondance with Tof. Civ. R. Att. 8.
Dunell G. Harger Durrell J. Hurger
*3
DARRELL J. HARPER
V.
STATE OF TEXAS COMMIGSIDN ON JAIL STANDARDS. ET AL.
IN THE EDUHT OF APPEALS THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT SITTING IN AUSTR. TEXAS
ABIEFIIDN
TO THE CLERK'S OFFICE: I. Now comes APPELlunt. Durrell J. Hurper. Obiecting to the court's Ausust 5, 2015. notice of appellunt's failure to make arrangements for the reporter's record to be filled with this court assuiner Affellces state of Texas Commission on Tuit standards. et al. 2. The reusents for the obiection is because on July 22, 2015 the one volume clerk's record was filled in this court accondies to the July 32,2015 netice, and a dismissal would more likely than not infriase urrellusio conslization rises. 3. Therefore solidifying aprellunt had indeed complied with the rules and procedure of this court. Even though beibury wub the motive to idea adventess of uprellunt for net beins rerrestated by counsel. 4. However, wnid until the error has soften the attention in its lackins Affellunt Dureill J. Hurper. Files motion for extension to filled uprellunt's beice should court's netice remains firm.
WHEATPORE APPELLuT DURreII J. Hurear Pray that he's justly entilled.
| | Very Truly Yours, | | :--: | :--: | | | Dutell 8. Hurper | | | Durrell J. Hurper Prose | | | Enmule No. 1457724 | | | D. B. Ellis Unit | | | 1647 EM 450 | | | Huntsville. Texas 77349 |
*4 Lectificution of Service Apeclunt, Durell I. Hurper. does hereby certify that the Disicetion is true und correct for process; as on or around Tuesday the 9th day of August 2015. in accordance with Tex. Civ. R. Att. P. September
Durell I. Hurper.
*5
