1. Shugart filed an Act 11.07, with motion for Evidentiary Heavily to determine Sufficiency Evidence to Variate Judgment and Brief in Shugart on 08-06-15.

2. 08-09-15 the trial court recommends designation of issues in public 3-4 be reminded to trial court for evidentiary heavily on review of affidavies/records.

Note made general denial of issues in which 08-15-15. No specialties.

1. 09-09-15 Shugart filed a Texas Tort Chairs Act and State Caseloadment Taking without Just Compensation. Law But action against the Identify Dept's Adjective for destroying his above building. Includes State of Action by illegal search of Relative, Case assigned to Judge Lourine Blake, 23-11, Exhibit Act Court.

2. 10-08-15 This Honorable Court of Criminal Appeals: Issues under "remonding", to allow the trial court judge to complete an evidentiary investigation.... Note. [Celerks conversely includes, 20: RICKY IDE ANDRAKT, but No MOYER RECIPYED IT.]

3. 10-23-15 Trial Court conducts "Cristus' on Writ Hearing" — which Shugart was not satisfied or allowed to be present (Brial Court's dectorated informed Texas District Attorney was present). No transcripts has been received or known to assist of this hearing. No evidence was known to be investigated. No affidavies/records reviewed. Defendent Shugart was not allowed to view or contest State of evidence.

4. 11-18-15 Trial Court signs order adopting the Tex District Attorneys' Proposal finding of Fact and Enchance of Law based on no affidavies/records. Filed after bucket designation of issue 3-4 (09-09-15) citing, Protective Counsell, Affidavit, Types.

5. 11-18-15 Shugart filed motion for Attorney Judgment with extensive Brief in Shugart containing 5 and 6 briefs (one cited, but omitted, in Writ page 15 of form, at bottom of page (round four, critical to affidavit of Counsel above) all showing (and) Writ Brief, page 11 midway) that PROVES CONVERS WAS PROFECTIVE.

See, Office of Further Records on File "Sout in this Court 11-23-15."

*3

*4 Relations View On Bobtam Line'

In Conclusion, I was given an attorney who believed in nothing but 'say your not paying' so all your getting it, placed out to whatever they want to give your. He was given advice by his own client, me, as to what should be done, ie. avoid all plus negociations. I seek suppression, from the post 50. Any reasonable attorney would have done the same. If Sales my breath-mnechan-to begin to take about his' Erenly-Ive reuver in my life seen such. I'm what can quads? 'Well, let's ask it his first. He said he didn't perceive suppression because of his Brinke's (after-the-test) consent to search, but he doesn't seek he even interviewer on Brinke (because she was saying it was under-thecut). The whole type now available on Civil case CV-15-32558 stated to the Summary Judgment Brief in Tube Biste's funct- ues given to Counsel Hoover in a last ditch attempt to set him to do his job, as stated in the way, shows his Brinke explaining the church she was under to sign the contract, as well as the impossibility of an Officer rounding a corner to see inside an opaque (a piece of his material accompanies the video) covered greenhouse and plants. Any competent Attorney would have followed my instructions to suppress. his Brinke's Affidative of illegal interests to sign the consent is included in Brinke. There's no way I could make an informed decision without being told about the case. And the attorney wouldn't elaborate any of all. I didn't even know what actually happened until I got a copy of the plan transcripets.

The Tudge starts off sizing with my situation. But when she had to briarlesin a law suit to put the illegal search, I seizure problem in check in her country, she quickly with draw. I signed off Having talked with many people in just and waiting to go the court in the courthouse lobby it is clear there is: a very real problem with Shorl's cbputies' gory into people's houses (Like me) I further, the attorney, Mr. Hoover himself told me its supported by both the State and Tube so that they won just continue to ravage people's things. I houses, my case is the classic example.

Agan Phear consider pass of my Supplement II of merit" prose." Finally, please give me equality before the law of this case? Justice! University Plickey Joe Shugart Grandly on Illegal Search, "Secretary,"

*5 Nancy Young District Clerk Fannin County Cause # CR-13-24788-A

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS:

EX PARTE: RICKY JOE SHUGART Louise Pearson, Please find enclosed a " SUPPLEMENT II " on Cause # CR-13-24788-A

If you need further assistance, please don't hesitate to contact me. Thank you. Yaysby Elison K. Ellison

Nite: Pettitioner's Objectives to the Fannin County District Clerk's Office Jrole's Recomendation was notfieduded, Pettitioner did art have opportunity to Participate, Object, Contont Stales Tesimony or primeness at Hearing, Trial Judge was upset because Pettitioner sought Turt Glenn Relief for damages done by Shurists deputation. Petitioner became No Hearing Tronkrights