MATERTALS WERE CONFTSCATEL BY THE ARRESTING AGENCY OE AALLAS COUNTY, AALLAS TEXAS, WHICH WILL MAKE ANY CORRESPONIEVCE TO THIS COURT, RELAVED AND WITH AFFECTIVITIES, TO TO RELATORS INI GENCY CONVITTING AND THIS AGENCY'S MINIMAL LONSING OE LEGAC SUPPLIES, 3 ENVELOPES AND 3 SHEETS OF PAPER DER CALENDAR WEEK, ALSO WHICH RELATOR HAS GREEVANCED THE BULAWELL CON- FISCATING OF SAIL MATERIAL ON OCTOBER 22,2015. ON WEINESHAY, OCTOBER 21,2015, RELATOR HAN AN VISIT WITH SAIL ATTORNEY. CONVSEL GAUE NOTICE TO RELATOR CONCERNTING THESE ISSUES! THE TRIAL COURT IS CONSIDERING NOT TO HOLL A HEARING, THE TRIAL COURT WILL MAKE FINDINGS, THAT RELATOR'S HLDT, WRIT WAS MIS- PLACEM AND WILL SECTION 4 (a), RELATOR'S ADRII 4,2013 WRIT, THE TRIAL COURT WOULD CONSIDER RELATOR'S LOST IN THE MALL "RELEMBER DB, 2011, H.RT WRTT, OE INEEFECTTUE ASSITANCE OF CONVSEL, (4) AND THAT RELATOR WILL SOON RE- TURN TO TALI-CIL. RELATOR CONTENIS THESE MATTERS TO THIS COURT WHE V.A.C.C.R.ART, H.DT, 3 S (b), WHICH IS A MANUATEM LAW.

WITHOUT SUCH HEARING(S) AND FACTS WILL BE ESTABLISHED THAT CARRIES TRUE MERTIS, TO ANY CLAIMS CONCERNTING RELATOR'S "ORIGINAL" MAY 22,2015, WRIT OF MANUAMUS (SEE THIS COURT'S RECORD OF RELATOR'S MAY 22,2015, MANUAMUS). THIS COURT GAVE IT'S "ORIGER CONCERNTING THE ISLUES OF RELATOR'S CLAIMS (SEE THIS COURT'S AUGUST 26,2015,ORGERS AFTER, THE RESPONDENT GAVE AN MIS LEAVING, AND INGERS (Cc) RELT STATEMENT TO THIS COURT CONCERNTING ITS "ORIGER" pg. 2

*3 TULY 22,2015, THAT RESPONHENT HAI NO RECORD OF RELATORS APRIL 4, 2013, H.O1, WRIT APPLICATION, RELATOR THEN THERMEN! THIS COURT ON OCTOBER 12,2015, WITH AN ATTACHET NOTICE FROM THE RESPONHENT, SHOULING THIS COURT, THAT RESPONHENT'S STATEMENTS ARE NOT FALLUALLY TRUE (SEE THIS COURT'S TULY 22,2015, ORIER ANI RESPONHENT'S RESPONSE TO THAT ORIER) (SEE THIS COURT'S RECORD OF RELATOR'S LATE) OCTOBER 12,2015 NOTICE). ANY FIMLTNGS MAJE AY THE TRIAL COURT WITHOUT THE MOLLITNGS OF FAIR HEARINGS, IS HEDEAY OPPOSED AY RELATOR AFTER RELATOR HAS MET THE TRUE RURIFES THROUGHOUT HIS CORRESPONHENCE WITH THIS COURT ON OCTOBER 12,2015, ANI THE TRIAL COURT HAS MET NON, ANI PRESENTE! PROOF TO ANY MATTERS, CONCERVING RELATOR'S FILLNGS OF PREUZOUS SUPERLEMESTAL APPLICATIONS OF THEREFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF CONSSEL CLATMS LAUER WRIT OF HAREAS CORRUS V.A.C.C.P. ART H.OT, 8 S.(D), TE THE TRIAL COURT ELECTS TO MAKE ANY FIMLTNGS OF SECTION 4(a), TO RELATOR'S ADRTE D4, 2013, SUPP. APP. WRIT OF H.OT, IT WELL BE AN UNTRUE FIMLTNG 40 TO THIS COURT HAVING NOT RESOLVED THE ISSUE LALTER MANUAMUS CONCERVING RELATOR'S RECEMBER OR, 2014, WRIT OF H.OT, LOST IN THE MATL ANI THE STATEMENT WITHIN THE RESPONHENT, GARA FITZSIMMONS, APRIL 10, 2014, "AFETIAUTT" PAS. 2,3, WHICH RESPONHENT STATE, THE APPLICATIONS TOO OPEM WATS NON-24020-A ANI NON-24020-B, WHICH SHOUS RELATOR'S DETEYWAC APPLICATION OF A WRIT OF H.OT, HAREAS CORRUS WAS AT THE TIME OF THE FILLNG OF HIS APRIL 4, 2015 WRIT H.OT, WAS OPEM AS HEEMEY AY AFETIAUTT OF THE RESPONHENT CHEEK (SEE THIS COURT'S RECORD) OF RESPONHENT'S APRIL 10, 2014 "AFETIAUTT" TALHIS "RESPIRSE TO SHOUS CAUSE ORIER).

*4 TE THE TRIAL COURT ELECTS TO CONSTITER RELATORS. SECEMBER OR, 2011, SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION WRIT OF H.O.T. HABEAR COROUS, THAT WAS LAST IN THE MAIL AS BETUS TIMELY FILES, RELATOR DOES NOT OPROSE THE CONSTITERATION OF THE SAIL WRIT, RUT REPUEST THIS COURT TO CONSTITER OR RECONSTITERATION TO AUD OF RELATOR'S H.O.T. WRIT'S THAT HAS BEEN SECTION 4(a) AND THE RESOLVEMENT OF THE WRIT COMPLETELY WHILE RELATOR IS HERE ON BEACH WARRANT, ID TO THE SECEMBER OR, 2011 WRIT IS AN IN- EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE CONSSEL CLAIM WHICH ALSO NEEDS AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING HOW REPUEST AN RELATOR: AND AY HABEAS COROUS KEY 742 WHICH STRESS "EVIDENTIARY HEARING ON A HABEAS COROUS PETITION IS REQUIRED WHEW EVER A PETITIONER'S ALLEGATION, TE PROVÉD, WOULD' ENTITLE HIM TO RELZEE, AND NO STATE COURT TRIER OF FACT HAS; AFTER A FULL AND FARR HEARING, RELLABLY FOOND THE RELE- VANT FACTS' EEE THIS COURT'S REEORD OF RELATOR'S SEE. OR 2011, H.O.T WRIT). WITHIN THAT WRIT, RELATOR REPUESTEL AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING, AND OPROSED THE SEVELOPMEST OF THE FACTS VIA AN AFFIDAULT, BECAUSE AFEIDAUTTS CANNOT BE CROSS- EXAMINED. IF THE TRIAL COURT CONSTITERS THE SEE. OR, 2011, WRIT, THEN EVERYUALY AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING WILL HABEAS, AND REPUEST TO THIS COURT IS, ALLOW THAT TO SEEVER WHTLE RELATOR IS HERE ON BEACH WARRANT, AND NOT HAVE TO BEY BEACH WARRANT ACATN, WHICH TS A WASTE OF TAX PAYERS MOVEY.

Pg. 4

*5 RELATOR, FURTHER CONTENNS TO THIS COURT, IF THIS COURT WOULU ELECT TO REUIEN ALL OF IT'S RECORN'S TACONIUNCTION WITH RELATOR'S ABOUE CAUSE NUMBER, THIS COURT WOULU SEE THE FACT THAT RELATOR HAS BEEN VERY SILIGENT ANI PATIENT IN ALL PROCEEDINGS. TUULY THIS HAS BEEN AN OVERLY UNBEARABLY SITUATION FOR RELATOR TO HAVE ENHURED, UPON THIS NOTICE TO THIS COURT, RELATOR WILL PROCEED TO THE HIGHER COURT'S IN THE MANNER OF U.S. 1983 SUIT CONCEEDINGS HIS V.A.C.C.B. ART. H.OT, WRT APPLICATIONS, IF THE TREAR COURT ELECTS TO 40 ANY OF THE THINGS RELATOR LISTEY PREVIOUSLY, WHICH HE OPPOSES. THE REFORE, RELATOR AGAIN, REDUESTS THAT THIS COURT WOULU ISSUE A WRTT OF MANIMANUS TO COMPELL THE RESPONDENT COURT TO COMPLY WITH THE MANIMATE OF ARTICLE H.OT V.A.C.C.B. RELATOR RELIEVES THAT THIS MATTER IS EITHER WITHIN ANOTHER COURT OR CONSIDERED BY ANOTHER TUNGEE, WHICH RELATOR WASH'T TOLD ABOUT THE CHANGE OF VENINE AND ORVEN THE OPTION TO CHANGE JURTS JECTION IN THIS MATTER. RELATOR HAS ALSO REPUCESTED FOR THE APPREITED COUNSEL TO AISCLASE HER STATE BAR NUMBER. RELATOR AT UTSIT HAS ALSO REPUCESTED FOR COUNSEL TO CONTACT THIS COURT'S CIERK FOR RECORNIS OF WRTTS H.OT, RELATOR'S MANIMANUS APPLICATIONS, COPY OF RESPONDENT'S AFFILAUTT ALM MAY OR, SOIS NOTICE LETTER TO RELATOR SHOULD OR THAT RESPONDENT HAN RECEIVEL RELATOR'S APRIL 4, 2013 H.OT, WRT APPLICATIONS BUT RETURNENT IT TO RE- LATOR, AGAIN, RELATOR REDUESTS THIS COURT TO INQUIRE INTO THE MATTER UNDER THE MANIMATE OF ARTICLE V.A.C.C.B H.OT. Pg. 5