Case Information

*1 CLERK ABEL ACOSTA.

THRE: DBSEC TON TO DISMILS HABEAS CODUS And DEVIED WRIE OF MANDAMUS CAUSE NUMBERS TRCT A-31659-D, WR-29,135-09 WR-29,135-08. Receivad CArds tATED OCT. 33rd 2015.

Please file And present before The COHEZS SIR. THANK YOH.

EXHIBITS LISTED ARE 1) EXHIBIT A RADIOLOGY REPORT. 2) EXHIBIT B VERITRATION. 3) EXHIBIT C TUMATES DECLARATION.

SENED THIS 26TH DAYOF OCTOBER 2215. By PESSE Tony Ray Agnes BILLS mahael Lins POBOT USED Tennessele Colony Taves 75886.

NOV 042015

AbelAcosta,Clerk

*2

EXHIBIT A

Correctional Managed Care RADIOLOGY REPORT

Date Transcribed: 03/28/2013 08:45 Patient Name: JONES, TONY R TDCJ#: 1312115 Date: 03/28/2013 08:45 Age: 49 year Race: W Sex: male Patient's Facility: MICHAEL (MI)

Department of Radiology

The University of Texas Medical Branch Hospitals Galveston, TX 77555 Phone: (409) 747-7000 Fax: (409) 747-2850 PATIENT: Jones, Tony DATE OF BIRTH: DATE OF EXAM: 3/25/2013 9:46:00 AM PATIENT #: 1312115 EXAM ID #: 6429482 REFERRING PHYSICIAN: GARY D. WRIGHT MICHAEL UNIT TENNESSEE COLONY, TX 75886 OFFICIAL COPY WRIST, MINIMUM OF 3 VIEWS-RIGHT SIDE HISTORY: ORIF 01/24/2011, LOOSE HARDWARE PAST 3 MOS COMPARISON: None. FINDINGS: An old fifth metacarpal fracture is noted. A cortical plate and multiple anchoring screws affix the distal radius in satisfactory alignment without evidence of hardware complications. No acute fracture or dislocation is identified. Mild soft tissue swelling of the wrist is noted. PAVIT BAINS, MD Personally interpreted by: FERNANDO CESANI, MD /signed by/ FERNANDO CESANI, MD Department of Radiology The University of Texas Medical Branch Last edited on: 3/27/2013 3:45:00 PM Finalized on: 3/27/2013 3:45:00 PM

Electronically Signed by GASTIAN, SUZANNE on 03/28/2013. Electronically Signed by WRIGHT, GARY G. D.O. on 04/08/2013. ##And No Others##

*3

$Ex\stackrel{\dot{}}{w}\stackrel{\dot{}}{\theta }\stackrel{\dot{}}{\pi }{\stackrel{\dot{}}{B}}^{\prime \prime }$

WHEREFORE, APPLICANT PRAYS THAT THE COURT GRANT APPLICANT RELIEF TO WHICH HE MAY BE ENTITLED IN THIS PROCEEDING.

VERIFICATION

This application must be verified or it will be dismissed for non-compliance. For verification purposes, an applicant is a person filing the application on his or her own behalf. A petitioner is a person filing the application on behalf of an applicant, for example, an applicant's attorney. An inmate is a person who is in custody.

The inmate applicant must sign either the "Oath Before a Notary Public" before a notary public or the "Inmate's Declaration") without a notary public. If the inmate is represented by a licensed attorney, the attorney may sign the "Oath Before a Notary Public" as petitioner and then complete "Petitioner's Information." A non-inmate applicant must sign the "Oath Before a Notary Public" before a notary public unless he is represented by a licensed attorney, in which case the attorney may sign the verification as petitioner.

A non-inmate non-attorney petitioner must sign the "Oath Before a Notary Public" before a notary public and must also complete "Petitioner's Information." An inmate petitioner must sign either the "Oath Before a Notary Public" before a notary public or the "Inmate's Declaration" without a notary public and must also complete the appropriate "Petitioner's Information."

OATH BEFORE A NOTARY PUBLIC

STATE OF TEXAS

COUNTY OF being duly sworn, under oath says: "I am the applicant? petitioner (circle one) in this action and know the contents of the above application for a writ of habeas corpus and, according to my belief, the facts stated in the application are true."

*4

1. Tany AAY SONES, am the applicant/petitioner (circle one) and being presently incarcerated in $AARK$ W.MEHAEL unit, declare under penalty of perjury that, according to my belief, the facts stated in the above application are true and correct.

Signed on 6TH Day of Avivפקoo 2015

*5 IN THE COURT of CRININAL APPEND of TEXAS, AUSTIN TEXAS DIVISION

Tony Ray Jones VS. THESMTE of TEXAS

CAUSE NO: RCT. A-31-689-D WR-29-735-08 WR-29-735-09

OBSECTION 76. DISMUSSED HAREAS CORPUS WITHOUT WRITTEN ORDER AND DENDED APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS.

HONOMBLE COURTS NOW COMES PROSE APPLICANT / RELATOR IN ABOVE TRIED AND STYLED MOTION AND SIDDUS THE following:

I.

APPLICANT PROSE IN TRICE A-31-689-D AND WR-29735-08 AND UR-29-735-09, IS BEING SIVEN UNDUE BURDEN AND FORCED To Sump Through HObars And Leap OVER HARDShip HURdles To SEEK DUE PROCESS AND LIBERARY FROM HIS. HAREAS CORPUS WRANSTALL CONVICTION. HE WAS TREAT. TOID HE HAD ACID) dAY RESPONSE TIME AS To WHY HE DID NOT HAVE A HAREAS CORPUS IN (CCA) AND HAD TO file ANOTHER WRIT OF WHICH (CCA) HAS BEFORE ETS COURTS NOW.

*6 Applicant Now is Pacing 7510 He failed To "SOn A VARIATION" and Added An Exceeded Two pages Allowed By HABEAs CORPUS FORMS.

The COVER PAGE of (CCA) forms titled "TusTRuctions" PARAGRAPH # 8 RELAS." YOU MUST VERITY THE Appuiction By Sloping EITUER THE OATH BEFORE NOTARY PUBLIC OR "THE INMATES DECLARATION".

"Applicant SIGNED THE INMATE DECLARATION."

PAGE # 16 of the form Applicant SENT is tHYE "VARIATION" And STATES ON SECOND PARAGRAPH, "THE INMATE APplicant MUST SIGN "EITUER" THE "OATH BEFORE NOTARY PUBLIC" BEFORE A NOTARY PUBLIC "DR" THE "INMATE DECLARATION WITHOUT THE NOTARY PUBLISHING ON PAGE # 1" TITLED "INMATE DECLARATION" PAGE # 1" OF THE H.OT HABEAS CORPUS FORMS bte fHled out.

THE FARMS APplicant SENT 76 (CCA) HAS A TOTAL OF 18 PAGES. PAGE 16, VERIFICATION EXHIBIT "R" PAGE 1", INMATES DECLARATION-EXHIBIT "C"

*7 APPIEANT is NOT A LICENSED ATTORNEY NOR HELD To THE STRIMENT STANDARDS AS A LICENSED ATTORNEY See, 404 at 520, 925 ck at 696,30 L. 8 d at 654 see also, Campbell V. Beto Smith, Demas V. WAINGRIGHT, STHCR. 1915, 522 f.2d 122, GAMBLEV. EETELE STHCR. 1915,516 f.2d93n.

APPIEANT Is REVies To SEEK BOTH DUE PROCESS. And his Liberty Due to A WRONFULI CONUICTTON and is REYng TREATED DIFERENTly SImply BECAUSE HEIS THOIGENT And CANT Afford paid COMSEL And files PROSE. See, WOLFF V. McDONNELL, 491 u.s. 539 (1914) Supleme COURT Ruling. APPIEANT HAS A LIBERTY INTEREST TSSE CHEN A HÖMER STANDARD HEMEETS IN HIS CASE SEE, SANDIN V. CONNER, 515 U.S. 412 (1995).

II.

APPIEANT ONLY Adbed "ONE EXTRA PAGE" TH GROUND THREE, BRADY V. MAYLAND VIOLATIONS" Along WITH VIOLATIONS OF SENATE BILS 16 U, 825, MODEL RULE 318 And NEOLENT of DUTY OF COURT OF fICES VERNONS ANN. CIC.P. 2103.

IT SEEM ANTTE ODD APPIEANTS 11.07 is REYng DISNTSSEd And HIS WRIT OF MANDAHUS DENIED SIMPY BECAUSE OF "ONE EXTRA PAGE" NO LESS, A, BRADY VIOLATION GROUND ON MISCONDUCT OF A PROSECUTOR, A STATE BAR MEMBER And ABUSE OF TRIAL COURT DISERETTEN. THIS GIVES THE APPERENCE

*8

of EVASION.

III.

Applicant is [70% ] HANDREAP IN RIGHT HAND And CRiPple To The point He cant HARDly Hold ONTO AN TNK. PEN - "Thus the Reason for sRound Three "One EXTER PAGE" Because Applicant canT WRIE VERY WEIL And HIS HAND WRITTEN MOTIONS SHOW HIS EXTEENLY DAD PENNISHIP DUE To Implares And ARTHETIS in His RIGHT HAND. SEE, EXHIBIT "A" RADIOLOGY REPORT, And DR. sTANLEY R. LEHMAN HAND-SPECIALIST of LUBBock Texas. HMC Hospital January 11th 2011 - January 24-2011 SENGURY. M.D., LEHMAN sTANLEY R. 76-4805 UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER WMEtS 5887984 PATtEMT. TONY RAY SONES 7:20 AM SERGURY:

Applicant could NOT Place All of Ground Three on Two pages with full Explanation Citins 2,03 BARAGRAPHS (A) (B) DNA Evidence, BRADY illustrations And ONly "One EXTER PAGE" WAS USED in EXtRE 11.07 faRms MOTION.

IV.

DUC PROCESS CLAINS THE GOVERNMENTS DEPRIVATION OF A PLANNTIP'S LIBERTY OF PROPERTY INTEREST 5 imply To SHIELD GOVERNMENT OF LOND, Sea, CAMMARO-EL, 523 US 28545 See Also, DuPREEV, SANNDEES, 588 F.3d 283,289 (sth.CIR 2009).

*9 JUDGE'S FATE IN PANEL'S HANDS. Justice, SHARON KELLER ACcused of FAppepely Closing COURT To EHNATE: The DEETU of RICHARDS S TARTEED THE DUBLICS Eyes To open ON ABOSE By pHUMS of OUR COMMUNITY "VIA" SO RGE RANFEL'S STATE COMMISSION ON SUDICIAL CONDUCT AS PRASECUTOR, WRE MCKETTA MAKES ARGUMENT AS AUGST SUDGE, SHARON KELLER. PRusecutOR t-Sudicial misconduct /AbuSE Asain SURfACD in THE MICHAEL MORTON CASE CANGING SENATE BII 1611, 825 And MObEL RULE 3.8 To BE CAUSE OF WRONSTLII CONVICTIONS And LANS RASSED TO PREVENT THEM. SudiciM ABuSE, Kept Hiddon By fellow STATE EAR BROTHERS /STETES Does NOT PREVENT ABuSE IT ONLY TRys To COVERIT up To PREVENT THE Publie from BECONing AWARE And ACTIVEST To PUSH for CONVIRCTiONS of ABuSE, CRiMINAL CHARSES IS THE ONLY WAY To STOP ABuSE By STRE BARMMEMBERS. OUR Bill OF RIGHTS is AN Explicit Recognition of OUR Founding FATHERS "DISTRUST" of CONGRess. CONERess SHALL NOT AERIDEE, SHALLNOT INFRINGE, SHALLNOT DENY, DISPARAGE, VIDLATE, SEE ALSO, UNITED STATES CONSTRUCTION, SECTION 1 ART, 14 DUE PRocess, EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAW TO FTS Cfrizens BORN in This COUNTRY.

*10 PREFER EAR RELTEE HONABBLE COURTS PROSE APPLIANT / RELATER of 11.07 HABERS CORPUS AND WRIT OF MAN- DANUS NOW BEFORE THE COURTS APPLIANT PRESIS THIEM BOTH BE GRANTED DUE TO CONTENT OF THIS OBJECTION SIVEL YET ANOTHER 11.07 AND WRIT OF MAN- DANUS WOULD ONLY PUT WINDUE BURDEN UPON APPLIANT AND COURTS AND Loss OF ENFIDENCE ALREADY SENT. SREMED THIS 26TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2015 BY PROSE TONY, REY, SOONS*DANUS POBAT USED THANNESsee Colony, TUBESSTSSS6

*11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is To CERTIFY THAT THE FACESONS is true And correct To the Best of my Knowledge And An Wisdom of this Facesness WAS SENT To Clark, Abel Acosta AT The Court of Criminal Appeus of Texas, PoDof 12308, capital 5 TOTAL, AUSTIN, Texas, 78111 By The UNITED STATES MAIL SYSTEM THIS 26th Day of October, 2015

By Quase Tiny Revisions * 1312115 PoDof 4500 Tennessee Colony 128575886