History
  • No items yet
midpage
Jadon F. Newman v. Firstmark Credit Union
03-14-00315-CV
| Tex. App. | Aug 19, 2015
|
Check Treatment
Case Information

*0 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/19/2015 9:34:30 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk THIRD COURT OF APPEALS 8/19/2015 9:34:30 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE AUSTIN, TEXAS 03-14-00315-CV *1 ACCEPTED [6573044] CLERK CAUSE NO. 03-14-00315-CV IN THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS JADON NEWMAN

Appellant

v.

FIRSTMARK CREDIT UNION

Appellee APPELLANT’S SECOND OPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY BRIEF Respectfully submitted,

R UGGERO L AW F IRM PC

SBN 24044377

1411 West Ave Ste 200

Austin TX 78701

peter@ruggerolaw.com

and

Craig S. Smith

SBN 18553570

14493 S.P.I.D., suite A, P.M.B. 240

Corpus Christi, Tx. 78418

361 728 8037

csslawrr@gmail.com

ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED *2 TO THE HONORABLE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS:

Comes now Appellant Jadon Newman, respectfully showing the Court as

follows:

1. Appellant is Jadon Newman; Appellee is Firstmark Credit Union.

2. This motion is filed on August 19, 2015. Appellees' Brief was filed

on November 12, 2015. Appellant's reply brief, after first extension granted, was

due on January 8, 2015.

3. This is Appellant's second motion for leave to file this Reply Brief.

4. Appellant requests leave to file this brief based on the facts stated

below.

5. Appellant Newman hired Peter Ruggero as counsel in relation to post-

judgment trial representation. He subsequently and recently retained Ruggero to

serve as co-counsel in relation to the appeal. Co-counsel Ruggero reviewed the

record and determined Firstmark failed to attach a key document to its summary

judgment motion, and therefore failed to conclusively establish its right to

summary judgment. In this reply brief Appellant Newman explains why this

defect in Firstmark’s proof requires a new trial, and squarely brings it to this

Honorable Court’s attention. Newman respectfully renews his request for oral

argument on the cover of his reply brief.

PRAYER Newman respectfully moves the Court to grant leave to file this brief, to set

this case for oral argument, and for all other relief to which he is entitled.

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE Peter Ruggero, counsel for Newman, conferred with counsel for Firstmark,

and Firstmark opposes this motion for leave.

Respectfully submitted, /s/ Peter C. Ruggero R UGGERO L AW F IRM PC SBN 24044377 1411 West Ave Ste 200 Austin TX 78701 peter@ruggerolaw.com -and- Craig S. Smith SBN 18553570 14493 S.P.I.D., suite A, P.M.B. 240 Corpus Christi, Tx. 78418 361 728 8037 csslawrr@gmail.com *4 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE This document complies with the typeface requirements of T EX . R. A PP . P.

9.4(e) because it has been prepared in a conventional typeface no smaller than 14-

point for text and 12-point for footnotes. This document also complies with the

word-count limitations of T EX . R. A PP . P. 9.4(i), if applicable, because it contains

208 words.

/s/ Peter C. Ruggero Peter C. Ruggero CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE On August 19, 2015, in compliance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure

9.5, I served this document by e-service, e-mail, facsimile, or mail to the

following:

Lessie Gilstrap Fitzpatrick

lfitzpatrick@fbhh.com

Lisa C. Fancher

lfancher@fbhh.com

Christine E. Burgess

cburgess@fbhh.com

98 San Jacinto Blvd., Suite 2000

Austin, Texas 78701

(512) 476-2020 phone

(512) 477-5267 fax

Counsel for Appellees

/s/ Peter C. Ruggero

Case Details

Case Name: Jadon F. Newman v. Firstmark Credit Union
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Aug 19, 2015
Docket Number: 03-14-00315-CV
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.