Case Information
*1 AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed May 28, 2015.
In The No. 05-14-00962-CR No. 05-14-00963-CR ALLEN HO, Appellant V.
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. F13-58092-J, F13-58094-J MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Fillmore, Myers, and Evans Opinion by Justice Fillmore
A jury convicted Allen Ho of two aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon offenses.
The trial court rendered judgment sentencing Ho to fifteen years’ imprisonment in each case. See T P ENAL C ODE NN . § 29.03(a)(2) (West 2011). On appeal, Ho’s attorney filed a brief in
which she concludes the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807, 811–12 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to Ho. We advised Ho of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a *2 pro se response. See Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (identifying duties of appellate courts and counsel in Anders cases).
We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We agree the appeals are frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeals.
We affirm the trial court’s judgments.
/Robert M. Fillmore/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE JUSTICE Do Not Publish
T R. PP . P. 47
140962F.U05