Appellants appeal the trial court’s December 1, 2014 order granting a motion to clarify the parties’ agreed order staying enforcement of the judgment. Appellants filed their notice of appeal on March 13, 2015. In a letter dated April 9, 2015, we questioned our jurisdiction over this appeal and instructed appellants to file a jurisdictional brief and gave appellees an opportunity to respond.

Appellants timely filed a request for findings of fact and conclusions of law, and filed their notice of appeal fifty-seven days after the order was signed. Generally, a notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days of the appealed order. P. 26.1. A timely request for findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure *2 296, however, will extend the time to file a notice of appeal to ninety days if findings of fact and conclusions of law either are required by the Rules of Civil Procedure or, if not required, could properly be considered by the appellate court. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 26.1(a)(4). Appellees contend the request for findings of fact and conclusions of law here did not extend the appellants’ deadline. We agree.

Rule 296 does not apply to post-judgment hearings. See Johnson v. J.W. Construction Co. , 717 S.W.2d 464, 467-68 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1986, no writ). Appellants made the request for findings of fact and conclusions of law following a trial court’s order on a post- judgment motion. Findings of fact and conclusions of law are not relevant in this context. See id . For this reason, the request for findings of fact and conclusions of law did not extend the time for filing a notice of appeal, and the notice of appeal is untimely.

The timely filing of a notice of appeal is jurisdictional. See EX . R. A PP . P. 25.1(b). Because the notice of appeal here was filed late, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. T P. 42.3(a). 150342F.P05

/Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE *3 JUDGMENT

LUIS A. SANTIAGO AND On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District LINDA A. SANTIAGO, Appellants Court, Collin County, Texas.

Trial Court Cause No. 296-02073-2011. No. 05-15-00342-CV V. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright.

Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart, THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, participating.

OCWEN FINANCIAL CORPORATION,

OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, AND

MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC

REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, Appellees

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED . It is ORDERED that appellees THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, OCWEN FINANCIAL CORPORATION, OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, AND MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS recover their costs of this appeal from appellants LUIS A. SANTIAGO AND LINDA A. SANTIAGO.

Judgment entered May 18, 2015.