Case Information
*1 NOV 2015-193656, 2015-0154114 APPEAL NO. 2015-00448-CV/2015-641-CV NO. 01-15-00448-CV&; 01-15-00648-CVV Robert Ronald Dwatme Whitfield, 1 in The 29STH
TO STRIKE DEPENDANT'S AND DISTRICT C. L. K.'S AND J. SSET ASIDE BOURT'S "Jus. HENT AND ORDER" REBARDING MOTIONS TO DECLARE PLANITIFF AS WEATHTOUS LITIGATY, AND CONTEST, PIRSUNIT T TEXAS RULES OF CIIWIL PROCEDURE
And makes not a "generai a yearaerter, but a "special apearance" and wald
*2 EXHIBIT 4 All motions of comself for Defendant Rejhold and Rejholds are ordered Stiken from the record, including any motion tabled a "contest" if it be seeking relief from this court. It is FURTHER ORDERS Canuel and Defendant Rejhold and Rejholds Shall say Plaintiff herein in an amount of 5,000.00 for their actions for which made the basis for my orders.
The motion C listed a "contest" was not properly ever before this court and is hereby ordered Stiken. As s use of this court the Affidavit of Plaintiff wherein he fully complied with rule relating to indisency was not somehow called to my Attention. I have durthortly to revisit my earlier order
*3 EXHIBIT 5
and "judgment" notwithstanding appeal pending. 200 mostion certificate 6 conference had been filed, 2 Plaintiff had properly filed 145 Affidavit to sue on appeal, 3 That affidavit is in the appellate record of appeal and stamp as filed before I rendered my order, 4 (Plaintiff did not appear at hearing, 5) the ordered order that I signed and rendered and the clerk entered and issued is not the same proposed order that attorney submitted to me for my signature. 6) Plaintiff received neither actual nor constructive notice that I had not only Signed an order that he never set to inspect per se, but also, no noticed nor order
*4 EXHIBIT 7 itself was forwarded by neither court clerk nor by attorney to Plaintiff, which is probably why about this matter being perpetrated with the failed to then investigate.
According to the message, Marr's comply is ordered to pay Plaintiff herein $5,000.00 for her stunts and she is hereby ordered to refrain from fulling any such future stunts in his case.
My orders shall be sadished within (30) thirty days to entry.
*5 EXHIBIT 9 The losing party shall have a right to appeal these rulings as in ordinary appeals.
19 SUDGE Presiding CERTIFICME OF Confidence 1, the undersigned, was told to "tell the SUDGE, don't tell me nothing csic?" Don't tell me nothing csic! " By ADOPTED BY HANN LAMY, was was
*6 EXHIBIT 10 As for Defendant's Commet, I not only talked with the mine or ye- day and was informed that a contest would be coming and an smanded motion to declare me as Veratisss, ect., and informed that this/ nothing would be of busting would be of I called today for Friday, 18 SEP. 2015 A.D. commet and my call was not returned! I informed I will bring these motions for both yesterday and today.
*7 EXHIBIT 11 to the court for nings.
"cansel of record" (althusy" this) to receive a true conf of this filmy.
*8
EXHIBIT 8
Affidavit
OF FACS
Judge there is - as MLK-1 can now understand for MLK. Time, time, time. Judge without need to conduct the hearing, but have "authority" to rule on these malions as a matter of lawas they relate to counsel's motions to contest and declare the mad and Rather than take time and do this like I used to in early and lateral Court like attornet's drafting Plosis. 108
*9
EXHIBIT 1
like attorneys draftins Peafin'33, suffice it to sass since Canada know-And that is why they omitted- that the same within which to bring these motions to declare the Niall or vexatious has passed, the Court has no power to retire an Grant relief, and a statute of limitation. I do not waive it if that were possible). What do camels trit to beat Pene God? is what is craci and vexatious. As to context, not only is that too late, but also Texas law authorize the
*10 EXHIBIT 6 Affidavit. Construction Code and Afficalitity have no issues against what I do. Nor has Texas personnel General, Dr. eet., just these camels whom have already lost Earth, Wind Fire, gas. Even were their motions timef, they know they cannot satisfy the requirements of the law for so declaring. The Court has jurisdiction. I have Standing to sue. You already "deemed" their motions to Dr. Smil's. Thus, as to my chances of winning or losing. 1000 . The less-latue has overstented.
*11 EXHIBIT 12
Nevertheless, Since we know a person may be guilty or innocent and a sury is still free to vote now it chooses in spite of this, I fail to see the point.
Although Elvis Presley was guilty, the women jurors thought him pretty and handsome and voted to not convict him. The Harris county D.A. 1037 but the evidence showed.
In any event, counsels have not demonstrated why a God-fearing sury would vote to ignore the evidence and declare defendants here the winner. As such, they
*12 EXHIBIT 9 have made no efforts to satisfy the startute's requirements. They cannot set any judgments nor orders into evidence. have not claimed they will call judges to teagfully be certified reeads attached, no certified doctor sheets. No mandates canot prove I allamped to relate claims, ect. They cannot prove not one (1) material element without the Earth, the will cease to exist it. On essential element to maintain life on
*13 15
EXHIBIT 14 earth. The feet that I pretend to be benciful stuck camels anym to tell on.
As for Mars cavity, the following incorpated heren fog- steak for themselves. DANED FIDDY, if SELF. 2015 Ereated order. Bersing. For en.feach. Eem. little. By 122.00ft.
*14 16 I wbe, under bescalty of pering - my phone vicously old conversations, incoming and acturing, too, I wenty that I did not have a conference call BELELE Consels in this case מז their motivs, other than the motion, received today, today, I left. SOSY to contest my attributing of indising. My father did not a bout to my his motion.
*15 17 me about flying his mobiles. I did tale to his law partner regarding firing of content the statement in attached and may happen over trade if conference salesdecisth market to me are defective. If can't that no ovidiction at time it sentenced me to death, ovidiction will not "arise through the baisse of time." Since compats failed to contest affirmly the other part of the their opportuations of confidence with motion and failed to conference with me before and the only subject of any of the above would be expected by the government.
*16
ONCESTHAT
*17
F I L E D
Chris Daniel
District Clerk
JUN 172015
CAUSE NO. 2015-08974
TONIAY
PROPHET WHITFIELD,
TONSO
Plaintiff
vs.
DIG STAR HONDA,
Defendant
OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
295th 1798CIAL DISTRICT
JUDGMENT AND ORDER SUSTAINING COUNTRY TO PAUPER'S OATH
Came on to be considered the Contest to the Affidavit of Inability to Give Cost Bond of Affiant, in the above numbered and entitled cases. Affiant was notified of the Contest by certified mail return receipt requested and regular mail. Upon consideration, the Court finds that Plaintiff did not comply with TRAP 20.100-m his Affidavit of Inability to Give Cost Bond. Plaintiff's Affidavit does not contain, but required by TRAP 20.1(h), "complete information about": (1) personal property Plaintiff owns; (2) cash Plaintiff holds and amounts on deposit he may withdraw; (3) Plaintiff's other assets; (4) the nature and amount of Plaintiff's debts; (5) the nature and amount of Plaintiff's monthly expenses; and (5) Plaintiff's ability to obtain a loan for court costs. Therefore, the Court must SUSTAIN the Contest to the Affidavit of Inability to Give Cost Bond of Affiant. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that the Contest to the Affidavit of Affiant Prophet Whitfield to proceed in this matter without payment of the costs of appeal or any part thereof, or to give security therefore is SUSYAINED. It is, further,
ORDERED that the District Clerk shall not proceed or process any further actions or settings on this case unless and until the Affiant Prophet Whitfield pays and/or deposits in full all costs of this appeal.
Signed this day of June, 2015. Carrine Baken Judge Presiding RECORDER'S MEMORIANDUM This instrument is poor quality at the time of imaging
*18
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing instrument was forwarded to the following counsel of record via certified mail, return receipt requested, facsimile and/or messenger on this the day of September, 2015:
Prophet Ronald Dwayne Whitfield 7522 La Salette Street Houston, Texas 77021
CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE The subject of whether Plaintiff, Prophet Ronald Dwayne Whitfield, will be, declared a vexatious litigant, was discussed in open court at the hearing on September 14, 2015, before the pending motion - to which Defendant, The Reynolds and Reynolds Company was a party - was passed. Plaintiff is opposed to being declared a vexatious litigant.
S 2 Item swbell. net
*19
CAUSE NO. 2015-68974
CERIIFICATE OF SERVICE
I neraly carify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing Notice of Heoring. Diaris: Clark's Contest of Affidavit of Ind'gence, Motion for the Request for an Extension of Time and proposed Order thereon were sent by regular mail and/or certified mail, return receipt requested, on MAY 25, 2015 to the following:
Cificini Court Reporter 295TH Judicial District Court 201 Caroline Houston, Texas 77002 PROPIET WHITIELD 7522 LASALEITE HOUSTON, TX 77021
Certified Mail 70142870000227302403 Retain Receipt Requested
HARRISON GREGG . Senior Assistant County Attorney
*20
C.AIGE NO. 2015-68374
- BROFHET WHITEHILD V.
BIG STAR HONDA
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY. TEXAS 295TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NOTICE OF HEARING BY SUBMISSION
Please be advised that on JUNE 8, 2015 AT 8 AM, in the 295TH District Court of Harris County, Texas, the District Clerk's Contest of Afifant's Affidavit of Inability to Pay Costs will be presented to the Court for a ruling.
Respectfully submitted, VINCE RYAN County Attorney TX Bar No. 9999993? By: Harrison Group, X Texas Bar No: 08429500 Senior Assistant County Attorney 1019 Congress, 15th Floor Houston, Texas 77002 Telephone: (713) 274-5169 Facsimile: (713) 755-8848 ATTORNEY FOR CONTESTANT CHRIS DANIEL, HARRIS COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK
*21
DISTRICT CLERK'S CONTEST OF AFFIDAVIT OF INDIGENCE TEXAS RULE of APPELLATE PROCEDURE 20.1
TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:
COMES NOW, the District Clerk of Harris County, Texas, enters a genoral denial end pursuant to TRAP 20.1, contests the Affidavit of Inability to Pay Costs of the Affianc pesionsly filed herein, and in support of such contest states:
I.
The District Clerk demands strict proof that the Affiant is unable to pay filing foes. II. "A party who cannot pay the costs in an appellate court may proceed witbout advance: payment of costs if: (1) the party files an affidavit of indigence in compliance with this rule: (2) the claim of indigence is not contested or, if contested the contest is not metoined by written order; and (3) the party timely files a notice of appeal." TRAP 20.1(a)
III.
The District Clerk alleges the Affiant has failed in complying with one or more of the statutory requirements under TRAP 20.1(b) which states: "The affidavit of indigence must identify the party filing the affidavit and must state what amount of costs, if any, the party can pay. The affidavit must also contain complete information about: (1) the nature and amount of the party's current employment income, government-entitlement income and other income; (2) the income of the party's spouse and whether that income is available to the party;
*22
*23 The Office of Vines Ryac County Attomey
Clir's Daniel Harris County District Clerk 201 Caroline, Ste 420 Houston. Texas 77002 Re: Cause NO. 2015-08974; PECPHET WHITFIELD v. BIG STAR HONDA; In the 295TH District Court of Harris County, Texas, County Atomey File No. 479805.
Dear Sir Daniel: transmitted herewith for filing in the above referenced cause please find a Recuss for Fxtention and Notice of Hearing. Clerk's Contest of Affidavit of Inability to Pay Costs, and proposed Orders thereon.
Thank you for your courtesy and assistance in this matter.
Very truly yours,
HARRISON CREOG JR. Senior Assistant County Atomey VR/HG/kdr Attachments
