Case Information
*0 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/29/2015 12:25:07 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk No. 03-14-00570-CR THIRD COURT OF APPEALS 6/29/2015 12:25:07 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE AUSTIN, TEXAS 03-14-00570-CR *1 ACCEPTED [5860093] CLERK
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
THIRD DISTRICT
AT AUSTIN, TEXAS
__________________________________________________________________
ERIC BYRON CRAYTON, Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS APPELLANT’S OBJECTION TO THE STATE’S
ATTEMPTED SUPPLEMENTATION OF THE RECORD
__________________________________________________________________
TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE THIRD COURT OF
APPEALS:
Comes now, Eric Byron Crayton, Appellant in the above styled and
numbered cause and would show this honorable Court the following:
I.
Crayton was convicted in the above cause for the offense of tampering with
physical evidence and punishment was assessed at 35 years. Notice of appeal was
timely filed and the appeal docketed in this Court.
II.
A clerk’s record was filed on September 15, 2014. A certified reporter’s
record was filed on November 7, 2014 and a supplemental reporter’s record filed
on January 15, 2015. Crayton’s brief was filed on February 2, 2015. On fourth
extension, the State’s brief is due on July 3, 2015.
III.
On June 26, 2015, the State filed a motion under T EX . R. A PP . P. 34.6(d) to
supplement the record with State’s exhibit 73.
IV.
Appellant objects because supplementation is not appropriate under the
circumstances presented. The record on appeal already contains a State’s exhibit
73 certified by the court reporter as accurate of the proceedings which occurred at
trial.
V.
If the State maintains the current State’s exhibit 73 on file in this Court is in
some manner inaccurate, it should make use of the remedy provided in T EX . R.
A PP . P. 34.6(e)(3). Under the State’s proposed course of action, this Court will be
provided with two State’s exhibits 73 within the reporter’s record.
VI.
Appellant further objects to the State’s belated attempt to claim the record is
in some manner inaccurate or in need of supplementation. This cause is
languishing on the State’s fourth motion for extension to file a brief. In an order
dated June 12, 2015, the Court indicated no further extensions would be granted
and the prosecutor could be subject to contempt proceedings if a brief was not filed
by July 3, 2015.
PRAYER
Appellant requests this Court deny the State’s belated attempted to
supplement the record with a second State’s exhibit 73 for a record which has been
on file for eight months.
Respectfully submitted, /s/Richard E. Wetzel Richard E. Wetzel State Bar No. 21236300 1411 West Ave., Suite 100 Austin, Texas 78701 (512) 469-7943 (512) 474-5594 wetzel_law@1411west.com Attorney for Appellant Eric Byron Crayton *4 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
This pleading complies with T EX . R. A PP . P. 9.4. According to the word
count function of the computer program used to prepare the document, the brief
contains 326 words excluding the items not to be included within the word count
limit.
/s/ Richard E. Wetzel Richard E. Wetzel State Bar No. 21236300 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
This is to certify a true and correct copy of this pleading was sent by email
to Counsel for the State of Texas, Josh Presley, Assistant District Attorney, at
presj@co.comal.tx.us on this the 29 th day of June, 2015.
/s/Richard E. Wetzel Richard E. Wetzel State Bar No. 21236300