I DO NOT PENALIZE MS. LEAMBECG FOR HEC AREENT AND SUBSERVENT "JAIL TIME" UNLESS IT HAS SUZFACED THAT SHE HAS A SEKIOUS, CHRONIC PROBLEM THAT WOULD IMPAIR HEC JUDGEMENT. IF SHE HAS, THAT ASPECT HAS NOT SUFIFICIENTLY BEEN MADE PUBLIC. IF NOT, THEN COURONOR PERRY HAS NO BASIS FOR M'URTO!

AT THE SAME TIME, IT HAS NOT BEEN MADE CLEAR WHETHER OR NOT THELE WEEE LEGISLATIVE AND/OR JUDICIAL FEMERIES TO OUEERIDE HIS ANTICIPATED AND, THEN, ACTUAL URTO. IF THELE WAS A FEMERY, THEN WHY WASN'T SUCH INVOLVED IMMEDIATELY IN APPLI, 2013 AND/OR JUNE, 2013? IF THELE WAS NO FEMERY, THEN THE PROBLEM IS WITH THE PEXAS CONSTITUTION KATHER THAN CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR ON THEN COURONOR PERRY'S PART! FURTHER, IT IS WELL- ESTABLISHED BY LAW THAT COURONOR PERRY WOULD HAVE THE PROTECTION OF SOUCE-166N IMMUNITY IN THE FULFULMENT OF HIS OUTIEQ UNTIL IMPRACHED OUT OF OFFICE BY THE LEGISLATURE OR VOTED OUT OF OFFICE, FOR EXAMPLLE. ONLY WHEN "OUT OF OFFICE" COULO CRIMINAL CHARGES BE FILED ALWANT HIM. THE PRESSOR EICHACH NIXON. HE DID NOT KESIGN UNDER THEET OF CRIMINAL CHARGES BUT UNDER

*3 THE SAME POINT OF UELW AS COURCHOL. PEXEY "AND PASSEN THE SHLK" TO HIM. AS ALL OF YOU. ALE AWAR, IN POLITICS THIS OFTEN OCLUES—LET THE PELSON "SAY NO" WHO IS IN THE BEST. POSITION TO SHILUE AN UPCOMIN. ELECTRON. 4) IF THE ANSWER TO (1) IS STILL YES, THEN, IF THE LEGISLATURE WAS OF THE OPINION THAT COURCHOL PEXEY "EXHIBITED AQUSE OF POWER" IMPERACHMENT PROLEEDING WERE "IN OLDER." SUCH WAS THE SITUATION FOR FORMER OLDUERNOR FRE. GUSON: HE WAS IMPERALITED "OUT OF OFFICE" FOR AQUSE OF POWER" AND THEN APPROPRIATIONS WERE RESPONSED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS. 5) IF THE ANSWER TO (1) OR (2) OR EVER BOYN IS NO, THEN, A GAIN, THE FAULT LIGS WITH THE TEXAS CONSTITUTION FOR NOT PROVIDING ADEQUATE "CHECK. AND SALANCEE" FOR THE PROFER EXE LUTION OF TEXAS OLDUERNMENT. A GAIN, FORMER OLDUERNOR PEXEY CAN NOT BE FAULIED FOR IN. ADEQUACIE. IN THE TEXAS CONSTITUTION, AND, FINALLY, 6) AS THE OFFICE OF THE TRAUIS CONNY DISTRICT ATTORNEY PUBSUES THIS MATTER IN THE MANNER THAT IT HAS, IT CAN' AE CONSTRUED AS "SELF. SGEUING" WITH EVER "A VINDICTIVE TOUCH" TO IT. IF THIS IS, THE CASE, THEN THE WHOLE APPAIL IS AN AQUSE OF POWER IN ITSELF! AS SUCH, IT. WOULD TAI NT THE USLE OFFICE THAT ENEORCEES INTEGRITY IN THE OPERATION OF TEXAS OLDUERNMENT.

*4 THE THLEAT OF A SUCERSFUL TRIAL OF IMPERATMENT FOR ABUSSE OF EXECUTIVE POWER. WHEN "OUT OF OFFICE," CRIMINAL CHALLES COULD VERY WELL MAUE. FOLLOWED, NEME PRESSIDENT FOOD'S GALANTIAL OF. A FULL FACON FOR ANY CRIMINAL CHALLES THAT MAY HAY HAVE FOLLOWED HIS KESIGNATION. FOUNEL PRESSIDENT NIXON NEGER WEHT "ON TRIAL" FOR ANYTHING SO IT KEIMMING SPECULATING AS TO WHETHER OR NOT HE WOULD HAVE DESIGN CONTICTED! THE QUESTION WILL ALWAYS SE UNANGWEED: 'WAY IT IN THE REST, LONG TEAM INTECENTE OF THE COUNTRY THAT PRESSIDENT NIXON KESIGNAD KATHER THAN"FISH THINGS OUT?" "MARY INFORMED PEOPLE HAVE ADVANCE TO THE POSITION THAT IT WAS NOT. SOME SAY THAT, WHEN PRESSIDENT NIXON KESIGNAD, "THE FISHY WEHT OUT OF ALLE OF US ONG WAY OR ANOTHE." ALLE OF THIS WOULD IS E TRUE INDEPENDENT OF HOW MUCH WE LIXED OR DISLIKED PRESSIDENT NIXON PRESSOMALE.

HOW IS ALE TO THE TEXAS CONSTITUTION ON WHICH I AM NOT AN EXPENT.

D DOES THE CONSTITUTION ALLOW FOR THE LEGISLATURE AND/OR THE LONATS TO CALL A SPECIAL SESSION? OF COURSE THE OCDURANCE CHN. 2) IF THE ANSWER IS "YES," THEN DID A KEMBODY EXIST FOR THE LEGISLATURE TO OURRRISE THE VEVO, OR, IN APPLIL, 2013 AN ANTICIPATED VENTO? 3) IF THE ANSWER IS A GAIN "YES," THEN WHE DIDN'T THE LEGISLATURE SO-AT UNLESS IT HAD

*5 -5- A5 A FINAL THOUGHT, SOME PEOPLE HECK IN LUQQQCK WEKE OF THE OPINION THAT TEXAS TEEM REGGENT GICIPPIN "WAS ELQQWES OFP OF THE QQAQQ" UJA ABUSE OF POWEL BY OOUEXNOR PERAY, AS I WROTE TO THE SUBSERVERS OF THE LUSQQCK AVALANCHE-TOUENAL, THIS WAS NOT AN ABUSE OF POWEL BY OOUEXNOR PERAY OUT A REGUYAL TO EXPOWEL BY LT. OOUEXNOR DEWHUKSTE AND THE TEXAS SENATE! AS EUREY ONE SMOULO KNOW, SENATE CONFIRMATION IS SU PROSER TO PRAUISE AUTOMOMY FOR A PPOINTERS TO PEOPREW PERFORM THEIR OUTIRS. SO," WHELE WEKE THE LT. OOUEXNOR AND STATE LENATOR FROH, LUSQQCK WHEW THIS 'PREGUMER', TYPE OF ACTION WAS TAKEN A GAINUT REGENT GRIEPIN BY THE GOUEXNOR?" WHEN THIS E INQI VIQUALS DID NOT TAKE CONTRE-ACTION TO PRO. TECT REGENT GRIEPIN'S POSITION, THEY SE. HAVER IN A MANNER CONTRAAY TO THE SEST. INTEXESTS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS!

AEL OF THIS PAINTS THE PICTURE OF A STEENL OOUEXNOR MAVING TO WOEY WITH AN EXESSIVELY WEAR LT. OOUEXNOR! WOULD A OOUEXNOR GOT. TEN BY WITH THIS KING OF STUFF WITH LT. OOUEXNORS PREGTON SWITH, GILL HOPAY, OR BOS QULLOCH? I DO NOT THINE SO!

REGPEETFULLY YOUES, MAIL: BOX 6949 LUQQQCK, TY 39493 LUSQQCK, TY L. RICHARD GUADE 3105 LIST STREET LUQQQCK, TEXAS 39410