Case Information
*-666 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
*-660 In accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 6.1(c), the following *-636 I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Notice of *-629 information is provided: *-606 Appearance and Designation of Lead Counsel has been forwarded Via electronic *-585 Steven *-576 service and U.S. Mail to all counsel and parties of record listed below, on this the *-569 State *-556 LANGLEY & BANACK, INC. *-546 22nd day of September, 2015. *-506 Ellen B. Mitchell *-492 DYKEMA Cox SMITH
*-475 l 12 East Pecan *-460 Texas 78205 *-449 Mr. Bayern requests that all filture correspondence from either the Court or *-430 Harriet O'Neill *-419 the parties be directed to Mr. Brook at the above address. *-416 LAW OFFICE OF HARRIET O'NEILL, P.C. *-400 Congress Avenue, *-385 Austin, Texas 78701-21
*-373 Respectfully submitted, *-354 David J. Beck *-340 BECK REDDEN L.L.P. *-324 Houston Center *-309 McKinney
*-304 ~~ ~~ even *-294 Houston, *-283 S ate *-263 Bennett L. Stahl *-249 CURL STAHL GEIS, P.C. *-234 Riverwalk Place, Suite *-208 210-735-6889 *-164 R.’ *-160 Brook Steven *0 FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 09/22/2015 3:40:56 PM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk
*1 ACCEPTED 04-15-00507-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 9/22/2015 3:40:56 PM KEITH HOTTLE CLERK No. 04-15-00507-CV In the Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas Estate of Shirley L. Benson, Deceased On Appeal from Probate Court No. 2, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court Nos. 155,572 & 155,572-A NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AND DESIGNATION OF LEAD COUNSEL
To the Honorable Court of Appeals: Steven R. Brook, an attorney with the law firm of Langley & Banack, Inc., hereby enters an appearance in this case and notifies this Court and all other counsel that he is to be designated as lead counsel on appeal on behalf of co- receiver Arthur H. Bayem. Although Mr. Bayem has not been named as an appellee in this matter, he is a real party in interest according to the Notice of Appeal filed with the Court on August 17, 2015. The Notice of Appeal expressly challenges, among others, the probate court’s orders authorizing the payment of Mr. Bayem’s appointee fees and expenses as well as the fees and expenses of the law firm assisting him.