Mr. Daniels, in some of the cases filed herein, because for lack of a file-mark shaving date, time and name, it may present, like it has already presented jurisdictional problems for our court of Criminal Affects of Texas, a jurisdictional question for the justices of the First Court of Affects of Texas on whether or not their court itself has Jurisdiction on the merits, to render a decision away to may immediately presenting to you to file a notice of appeal after the trial judge could announced that he granted either one or both the defendants' Motions to Comel Arbitration. I recall asking you to indicate either your name or the time on said notice of Appeal, which you had.

If may notice of appeal to as filed before the trial judge signed Defendant's Santander's proposed order and gave same to you to file, then the appeal must be dismissed as "Premature." Because it likely is, I will have also caused you to file and "Present" to the trial judge a number of motions for rehearing. I would ask, in and event, you implement a Policy at once requiring even electronic filings indicate the Time and Name of your deputies so receiving and filing ORDERS.

*3 Judge Baker, someone C not a clerk, but probably only orking for a justice $J$ called me on besterday, askins about whether you appointed me an attomey, ect. and I think also about on whether you disposed of my motion to proceed without having to rax costs of suing out an appeal in advance, C costs have "always," said usca, sth Cir., "been due D. At this time, knowing that the appeals court lacky Jurisdiction over Your order granting Motion to Comer arbitration, I believe you should GRANT my motion/ DenJ it? the record will be obtained in the subject-matier MANDANUS Proceedings.

Also, Judge Baker, Please be on official notice that I am searching for million-dollars law firms C two or more to Supervise Each other J in the Case of whittield V. Honda, Wond-wide, for I do not want you to assume I no longer wish to "Assecute" this action, in liant of inactiun.

*4

Judge Baker, I just called C todal is Sundal, 9 August 2015J the First Coum of Ameals and left a message on the Private line of the caller to contact Me again. When the line answered it did not announced I had reached the Clerk's office of said court, nor did I recoonize her voice as one in clerk's office's so I assume she is a Suptort staff member of some justice.

Attomess

To all defense, and the Attornes for the Counts Attornes's office, the case relied on from Ist Con dealing with advance costs was decided on state law trincimes; not on due process rules. If you have a eoblem with m! mouns to sue in either the trial courts or in the abetlate courts, if you be claiming I have committed perjurs, then sue me through our Honorable Harris Comts District Attornes she accerts afilauits 29-1. If you are unhappy as to "Form" or technicalities in not comelbing with this Supreme Court of Texas written and adopted apetlate rule, 20, your renedy

*5 is not to cause our trial court clerk to file an affidavit of contest, ect., but to file a request, what we call a "motion" asking the trial judge to "strilse" my motion to proceed on reveal without having to set Texas in advance for suing defendants in the already court. C the lawsuits continues, ending in our U.S.Supreme Court, of petition for a writ (order) sounding in "certiorari"], but not because I be too poor to pass Texas at time of suing or in "advance"-or because my wallet or bank account shous I have "money" to ask said costs. Cand I have assessed the legal definition of the term "money" to ask be less than federal reserve Notes / U.S. currency of 150 million, for anything less than this is what we call "change" or "cash" and therefore such claim of poverty is "untrue!" but our Must come requesting the trial judge to entertain

*6 and excise the "authorits" the court gave the judge to "Strike" my "motion for failure to Compa with Tex. R. MP. PrD. Rule 20, Secirfing the exact Subrart, and asking the judge that the judge render an order that I be required to either cure the defect or else that the judge order the motion denied. But going further to violate Carmel V. Texas, 120 S.Ct. 1620 C2000 J C" The lesal result must be the same, for what E. Texas ] camot do Directly E she surely cannot do indirectly, the Constitution deas with Substances, not Shadows "D, by moxing that either case/motion be dismissed and denied, resrectively for failing to cross a T or dot an I will get you sued all the wast up to the/ our Us Supreme Court, for sar have some then So far as to UNLAMIPULY deprived and deny me of what the farmers called Refl "God-fiven rights" or "inalicrable rients" or "fundamental rights." Once I declare what the LAW

*7

1. then"it is what it is"? You need not question this andmore. See John
2. 1-13 C English standard Version / New American Standard Bible). TO both Defendant and Finalt, at Hornets, for First Service Credit Union, in drafting my orrional Petition, I will had, and I memord and the attendrises there attached, but by the time of Summard Judgement and/orrural trial C if need be), I will have(for spirits of tex.R. end,) audio and video and ensilhell statements of Affdavit from our other members, as well as from Smart Financial Credit Union, Chace Bank, ect. , such evidence that, just like I stated in said Petition, and just like at my other Credit Union (c suid), you, Defendant, have sudze Baker seated in a chair, ask her for her ID,ect., and have our Learned Judse sign her name on a "Pad" to run a credit check. She never saw She was signing this "Credit loan amication" you withheld.

*8 She never was given and could not original of this nor the separate con- tract with all these terms and Conditions that she just gave. After a period to upon signing this "Pad" to review her credit Status. Since she is a state-court judge, she tinued her debetors and earns enough cash to refer the loan. C she is only an elected judge and therefore has no "moned"(), the "undervriter" approved her $32,000 for this "auto" loan. The only thing left to do is provide her with a cost of the contract, which she is not to sign. If she realized this later, she will read in this binding contract a reference to a loan application and will want but not have it and will call you and you will tell her you will be more crown than (just) "happy" to provide her a cosperish mail or she "comedx" in her region to you and once she later ready it at home, she might also sue you, beowing real God that

*9 this case be assigned to her. And if it be, since it is personal to her, can we blame her for abusing her discretion in M仑FF WILLENLLY reRising to recuse herself, dealing your mother, leaving a record that, notwithstanding and "state laws" making it mandatory, she not hear the case. She can be impartial or fair? Again, I will have C-future tense. video and audio to move further, the claims regarding your Practice, which need no additional proof. The ONLY was you can test me credit worthiness is to review a credit report about me and before you may lessid and lawfully C I make lesald, civilly lawfully, criminal I do this is that I first Authorize you and I do so by signing your RQF - the signature of which is ented on your "Loan Application," which is unlawful

*10 and illesally sleeing together be-10 cause the Loan Replication is married to the mother of the binding contract (dentate) and under Texas law, it is incest for the Loan Replication to have sex with his steeplather while still married to her mother. To slee with her lawfully, he first must set legal divorce (dentate) to be safe, too, bearing clerks file-mark and clerks seal.

In order for a court to enforce war contracts, the legal burden will now shift to you to diserve the suara allegations in mid-original petition and on video of whomever I select to apply for an auto loan while I record- record--wait, that must not be legal nor lawful because I would not be a "partly" to the recording. I will just go in and apply for a new loan, less that is what I will do and record what happens. Thus, ameals, ects, are herbs amended in 1948.

*11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE This is to certify that 1, the undissigned, forwarded copies via email (or called to receive and assume now had received? email addresses to all canself of record.) to counsels of record this 10th day of August 2015

IS/Propriet Ronald Dwayne Whiteld

*12