Case Information
*1 July 24, 2015 Q1577
ALel Acaste, Clank To Count of Clinn. Appent. 201 as. 14th St., ten. 100 Auston, Texas 72901
RECERVED ESURF OF CRIMINAL APPERALS
In the E. E. Reate Wm. E. Judson, West Mo.
As it seems my Ad. H. 27. Wait of Nuteas Capues has not been presented to the Count farn Wiltamson County within the 55. by time set by claw (Sunt May 13, 2015 to Count) of Rarely, fale my "Wait of Exigent Nuteas E. Prodelictor" for immediate Count review. I will file for Defendit Judgment on the Wrist. Stain 5. E. E. Fegments included. d did receive the letter of July 20" fain yourself on the matter so poury the Ad. H. 27. Wait is now on file. Meals so appain me. Also fly offets my liberty. I dent you.
Raspetfully submitted, W. E. 20 E. Judson William E. Johnson 493576. C. T. Terrell Wost
1300 E.M. 655 Bochsons, Texas 77523
*2 COURT DE CRIMINAL APPRALE DEIEVAC
EY PARTE WILLIAM E. JOHNSEN F. WRTN0
Pitition 3
MOTION REAUEST ENC. LEAVE TO PILE
DEFURE THE CAURT?
COMPLE WILLIAM E. JOHNSEN, Pitition 20.55, and like his "Motion Requesting Lamm To File" only an original copy of all pleadings and documents on issues relating to his last 1887. Wait at Habees Corpus filled pursuant to new Constitutional violation, and, previously unadjusteated Constitutional violation that have kept Pititione illegally imprisoned and deprived of his liberty for 20 years.
Pititione is indigent and destitute by the illegal acts of the state by way of an 18 U.S.C. 5241 violation for official Oppression and Kidnapping where his illegal imprisonment has him been any employment to acco tunde to buy sufficient quantity of materials to produce and mail documents. T.S.C. records will reflect that through the major time period of his illegal re-incarceation Pititione has, and is, depending on the Prison system.
*3 Indigent Mail program to get his documents before the Court. Atitioner has to borrow prayer in many instances where the person system fails to abide by law and federal court decree.
Atitioner files at all times under Haines v. Herney, certe omitted) S.C. (1972) as not adageal professional nor one so trained so should not be held to the same standards.
WURRENORN, Atitioner so prays the Court GRANT him his request for loans to file all documents in only the original draft form for review and decision by the Court.
Respectfully submitted, willm E. Johnson William E. Johnson 1935-76 C.C. Terrell Unit 1300 F.M. 655 Rosharony Texas 77583
*4 COURT OF CREMEDING APPERLLS OF IEXAS
EXPORTE: 5 CIRLIERM E. JOHNSON, 5 WREL NO. 5 PATition 5
MOTION REAWESTED TO PROCEED IN FORM PRODERS
DEFONE THE COURT: COMES WELLIAM E. JOHNSON, PATitioner TO SE, AND files his "Motion Requesting To Proced In Forma Pauperis" in this and all matter relating to his present Art. He 07 Unit of Habers Carpus that should be on file as of June 30, 2015.
PATitioner states that he is without hands to pay anything too due to his illegal re-imprisonment on an expired sentence at record. PATitioner avers that he is without bank account, trust, hands, real estate and, as at last account in April, 2019, had a sum of in the Greater Texas Federal Credit Union. PATitioner states he receives funds from time to time in the form of support from his family who understands he is illegally imprisoned but has no prior notice when funds are to be sent.
PATitioner further avers that had it been possible he would pay any court filing ties,
*5 yet his illegal destitute status provents this action.
and without pre-payment of filing tans that filing at his "dent of внуgent Rehane" might
*6 COURT OF CREMENAN APPREALLY OF TEXNS
EXPANTE § WILLIAM E. TOHNSON, § WRILN O. PETition. §
WRILN O. ERIGENT RELEASE AND PROHIGSTION.
BEFORE THE COURT! COMBASSELLIAM E. TOHNSON, PETitioner prouse, and Files has "visit of Exgort Release § Rehibition" in the above styled cause, having yet to receive any new visit of the best Corpus case number from the clerk of the Couch Pettitioner. It, illegally restrained at his liberty on an applied sentence-of-record out of Williamson County, Texas, Judge Donna King with knowledge of this fact, said conviation ended August 2, 2013. (See C.C. Record Writ No. W.R-21, 577-01, 1970). Judge King Denied Pettitioner's "Pettition for Release", filed on or about May 18, 2015 along with Pettitioner's excessive Act. He 67 Writ on new issue of law, and, previously unadjudicated issues by this Couch.
By law, Respondents have lost right to file any answer to Act. He 67 Writ as being a month overdue beyond the 35 day limit set by law.
*7
The court has qucriculation quosiuast to the Taxas constitution, Act. 884 , and, the ALL WRETS Act to cweiew on issues at tuchal to wirit of Habeas corpus.
SPECIM POZNTIOTLAM
Two. pints of lam are to be noted. (1) Retitioner's connection was acquired by I year and I weeks when Hegally accostal on a bogus "blue marcent", 8 , (2) Retitioner's wirit of Habeas corpus was received by the Cloth of the Court, his David on or about May 18th or 19th, 2015, to be in the Court of Criminal Appeals about June 25-30th, 2015, yet quocruant to the datier of July 20, 2015, from Abel Acosta, Cloth, NO扛st is an Ole. Retitioner received "State's Answer &; Order" of July 9, 2015 on Quly 13, 2015, and enter his challenge to this Court.
By law, the "State's Answer &; Order" should be summarly Dismissed.
ISSUE
PRTITIENER IS ISLEARLY INCRECRATED WITH NO CONUECTION THAT IS BEING CHELENGED AND MANY STATE, LEOYL AND JOODIEAL OFFICIALS ARE NOW KNOWLEDGE ASLE OF.
*8 MANUMED'S AUTHORITIES.
Many issues of violation of law are in play that have worked to keep Patchronov illegally imprisoned in violation of the Texas Constitution, Act 1, 519. The T.O.G.T. I.D. and Parole Division, in violation of the 7x Const. Act 2, Separation of Power Doctrine (W.S.C. Acts 1, 253) by illegally, with NO Judicial authority, added Time to the end of Po litronov's Court-imposed sentence. NO. Dus Poceus of law occurred, no offence changed, no trial held. Approaches. Maw Jersey, S30 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348 (2000); Sandio v. Connor, S15 U.S. 472, 125 S.Ct. 2293 (1995); U.S. 614, 5514.
Dus Poceus of law is intended to secure the citizens against any arbitrary deprivation by the government, be it state or federal, of Right, relating to life, liberty (emphasis added) or property. (Dent. 20. Dingin, 129 U.S. 144, 9 S.Ct. 231 (1889)) and Patchronov has been deprived of his liberty and due processes where government engaged in conduct, intentionally, and withfully, that is so outrageous that it shocks the commercial sense of justice embodied in the Fifth and Fourteen the Amendment. (U.S. G. G. G. G. G., 818 F.S.pp. 1004 (S.O.Tx. 1993)), U.S. M. M. M. M. M., S57 F3D 219 (S.C. 2009).
In 1976 the Texas Legislative is intentionally, as with all dawn, placed a legal "loophole" in the law governing Texas Parole system in the event.
*9 the Law was ever applied to them. L Source to be revealed at trial for visit), Act 2 of the Tores Constitution, and, Acts 1, 2.53, at the United States Constitution strictly prohibits: the state legislators from amazing Lary Law that gives the power of one branch of the Tores government to another branch "except where expressly specified by the Constitution". The Executive branch, under which the T.O.C.ST. lies, has only 2 such exception (Mlegislative Veto, and (2) Judicial pardon.
NO GOBEES IS THE T.O.C. G system EM POWERED HVER THE CONSTITUTION TO EADD] TENO TO ANY CONTENGE EMPOSED BY THE TUBICZARY OF THE STATE OF TEXAS. ONLY THE COURTS MAY SET SENTENCE AND IERM THERROF (To Cunct, Act 58.8). Supermay Chuse applies a Patience did "MANDATORY RELEASE" on Oct. 1, 1997, and twice released by the Tores Sqprons count in both 2004 and again on June 8, 2011, on bogus revocations. At NO time did Patience sign away Lary accrued] "Good Time" or "Stent Time", at NO time on release under Tores's "Mandatory Supervision Release" scheme as should WEEK have been reimproved, with NO new charge being alleged or charged. (Morrisby e. Grewe, 408 U.S.471, 92 S.E. 2591 (1972) (disrupting opening).
*10 Tengus v. Lauterman, VREESR 767 (5th Cm. (Te) 2007); Colemon v. Drath, 375 F3d 216 (5th Cm. (Te) 2004); Richard v. Drothy, 374 F3d 291 (5th Cm. (Te) 2004)) v. Rabbisnce has reguested ALL his "street bus" under "Mandatory Supervision Release"; i.e., "Time seemed on Mandatory Supervision Release EISJ calculated as calendar times" (Act. 4212 U.S.CM 25th Sqg., Act. 1577; Tr. Govt. Code be credited back to him by t.bo.gy and DEMTEO in violation of Tengus, Coleman, S, Richard, supra.
The T.B.C.ff. Time Calculation Division holds they are applying Tr. Gout. code on taking of "street bus" a there again, this is a Constitutional violation as to so do would be RESTRUCTURE v. 4 applying how where said law lawas NOTJ on the bodies not even a law as of July 1, 1987, date of Rabbisnc's "alleged" (never proven) a blouse. The GRANDFACTURE CLINIC applies as dan the SUPPERMED'S classic.
Act. 1516 specifically states: "NO D. U. of Attainder, Ex. Pattacte dan, Retronctive law, not any law that imposes the obligation of contracts, EXMAUJ be made." Tr. Govt. Act. 1516 ; W. S. Govt., Act. 157, cl.3, 5, 310, cl. 1. There are NO D. U., and's or but's in the wording of the law. The Const.itation is the Superva bane of Tergs. Rabbisnc should be immediately ordered released.
*11 CONCLUSION
As it is plain that a 25-year sentence started on August 3, 1988 for 25 years clearly expired August 2, 2013 at midnight (SAT District Court, Williamson Co., cause No. 88-105-6) then aotanding said sentence illegally violates the bugus "plan contract" per Act. 1 5th, "nor impose the obligation of contracts" to the point of making it (Contract) null and void. This was a 25-year"content, not a 27-year.
This Court had the opportunity, in the early 90's, to vote on the Judge's act of DENYING Petitioners "Motion for Jury Trial", but refused to vote on the yudieial impropriaty ground thereby making Petitioner another egregious harm and wanted in theing even sowe. The Court now has a chance to correct a portion of this error at presents Petitioners 31983 on file will do the rest.
Judge kings knowledge of the facts of the illegal imprisonment and denial of release on the but as a pudieial Canon violation now brought to this Court's attention and will be noted to the Commission on pudieial Conduct for action.
PRAYER.
WHEREVER, Petitioner, to prays the Court, upon review of the facts and law heve in stipulated, to immediately GRANT him this dict of Release to immediately cease any but then violations of his
*12 civil rights. Pettitioner request Caping Account be issued and served on the Marchm at the C.T. Torvill Unit in Roshacon, Texas, by Court officers to bring Pettitioner before the Court for release and Protection Order against the State, T.O.C. system is full, and, any end off law on heremant agencies at the State of Texas in regards to any matter or application of Retroactive laws as applied to Pettitioner.
Pettitioner will reside at 2104 Rosemary Lane, Round Rock, Texas 78604 upon release until all legal and matters of suit are final. Pettitioner request at the immediate relief in this matter, Published opinion requested.
Respectfully submitted, willow t. Jodowson
William R. Johansen 423526 C.T. Torvill Unit
1300 F.M. 655 Roshacon, Texas 27583
*13
- William R. Johnson, T.O.C. No. 493576, being presently illegally restrained at my liberty in violation of 18 N.S.C. 5241 at the T.O.C.J. - T.O. C.T. Teocell Unit located at 1300 E.M.S.S., Roshaven, Texas 77587 in Brazoria County, declares under penalty of perancy that the foregoing documents are true and correct to the best at my knowledge.
Signed this the 26th day of July 2015
WICM &; GODMAN AFFICENT