Case Information

*1 MR. JASON T. PEGUES #728196 HUNTSVILLE UNIT 815 12th STREET HUNTSVILLE, TEXAS 77348

JULY 15,2015

TO: THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS CLERK OF THE COURT: ABEL ACOSTA P.O. BOX 12308

CAPITOL STATION AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

Re: Ex parte JASON TYRONE PEGUES v. THE STATE OF TEXAS IN REFERENCE TO CAUSE No.94-DCR-026185 HC3 and 94-DCR-026185 HC4 [WR-74,762-03...WR-74,762-04...WR-74,762-05].

DEAR CLERK OF THE COURT:

ENCLOSED IS A COPY OF A MOTION THAT WAS FILED IN THE TRIAL COURT IN REFERENCE TO THE ABOVE MENTIONED CAUSE NUMBERS AND WRITS. IF YOU WILL PLEASE FILE THIS IN THE COURT SO THAT IT MAY BE TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION UPON HEARING AND RULING, I WOULD REALLY APPRECIATE IT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND ASSISTANCE.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, JASON TYRONE PEGUES #728196 APPLICANT:

CC/file: REGENED IN COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS JUL 172015

AbelAcosta,Clerk

*2 $& a m p; No.94-DCR-026185 HC3 and 94-DCR-026185 HC4 \ & a m p; WR-74,762-03....WR-74,762-04....WR-74,762-05$

| NOTICE TO THIS HONORABLE COURT | | | :--: | :--: | | | | | | | | Ex PARTE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

THE FOLLOWING IS TO INFORM THIS HONORABLE COURT THAT A MOTION HAS BEEN FILED IN THE TRIAL COURT, AND THAT THE APPLICANT HAS SENT A COPY TO THIS HONORABLE COURT. IN SUPPORT OF SUCH MOTION SEE:

Ex parte POND. 418 S.W. 3 d 94 n. 13 (TEX.CRIM.APP. 2013): Best practices include filing all materials with the Trial Court before the Trial Judge has signed his Findings of Fact and made his Recommendation to this court. But an Applicant is not foreclosed from amending or supplementing his materials even after application is forwarded to this court, as long as those materials are filed in the Trial Court.

No.94-DCR-026185 HC3 and 94-DCR-026185 HC4 $ IN THE 240th DISTRICT COURT $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $

Applicant's Motion Requesting The Court To Hold HC3 and HC4 For 30 Days so Applicant Can Supplement and Amend The Applications

Comes now, Jason Tyrone, Pegues, 2728196, Applicant, Pro-se, in the above styled and numbered cause of action respectfully file this Motion Requesting The Court To Hold 94-DCR-026185 HC3 and HC4 so the Applicant CannSupplement Amend the Applications due to the reconsideration of 94-DCR-026185 HC3 and 94-DCR-026185 HC4 by this court based on the perjuzy made by attorney Cary M. Faden in his first affidavit that was attached to and referenced in the State's earlier responde to both third and fourth writs of babeas corpus. The applicant would also like to shew this Honorable Court the following:

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Applicant filed his initial application 11.07 (HC3) around February 10,2014 and on August 27,2014, the Gourt of Griminal Appeals denied the writ without written order. On December 10,2014, applicant filed a subsequent application 11.07 (HC4)[WR-74,762-04] and on March 4,2015 the Court of Criminal Appeals Dismissed the application without written order, in which this court reconsidered (HCA) and on June 10,2015, the Court of Criminal Appeals Dismissed HC4 (WR-74,762-

05) without written order. Applicant then f1led a post-conviction Motion For Forensic DNA Testing, and upon the State Investigating the DNA Testing Motion, on June 30, 2015, the State filed a Supplemental Amended Answer and Supplemental Amended Findings of Fact &; Conclusion: of Law, Reconsidering the applicant's applications 94-DCR-026185 HC3 and 94-DCR-026185 HC4 due to the perjury and error made by attorney Cary M. Faden in his first affidavit which was attached and referenced in the State's responses to applicant's third and fourth writs, and for the Respondent contacting Judge David Newell regarding his thoughts on the applicant's third application.

PURPOSE OF MOTION

Due to the reconsideration of the applicant's third and fourth writ for habeas corpus based on the State's perjury and error, the applicant is requesting that this Honorable Court hold the applicant's applications HC3 and HC4 for 30 days from the date of filing this Motion so that applicant can Supplementa2nd Amend the applications which were reconsidered. See Ex Parte PGND, 418 S.W.3d 94 n. 13 (Tex. Crim.Apr. 2013):

Best practices includa filing all matenials with the Trial Court before the Trial Judge has signed his Findings of Fact and made his Recommendation to this Court. But an Applicant is not foreclosed from amending or supplementing his materials even after Application is forwarded to this Court, as long as those materials are filed in the Trial Court.

The applicant also request that the applicant be appointed to counsel based on the facts, the record, surfacing the many unresolved issues in the current proceedings of this case 26185 . With the

applicant being Pro-se and layman of the law, there are some filings that can be filled unknown to the applicant which could assist him in these proceedings or harm him. Upon being appointed counsel, the applicant request that the appointed counsel do not file anything until the applicant and the appointed counsel have discussed all area's of the proceedings, asking this Honorable Court to order the appointed counsel to show proof that the applicant and appointed counsel have done as such.

Lastly, the applicant request anlive Evidentiary Hearing hased on the credibility of all those who have responded to the habeas corpus proceedings as well as the DNA Testing Motion Investigation that is currently active in this case.astworney Cary M. Faden was very aware of what the DNA test results were because he was the one who crossexamined the crime 1ab criminalist Monica Thompson. The bottom line is that if the applicant would not have filled a Motion For Forensic DNA Testing, attorney Cary M. Faden's perjury would not have possibly ever came to light. So the question is what other lies have been told and how long have these false and s1andering statements been stated. Out of all these proceedings, the applicant only request for a New Punishment Hearing. However, fastualiy, legally, and procedura1ly there are some unresolved issues that needs to be addressed and fairly adjudicated.

PRAYER

WHEREFORE PREMISES CONSIDERED, applicant, JaOon Tyrone Pegues #728195, respectfully prays that this honorable court grant this Motion requesting the court to hold HC3 and HC4 for 30 Days so applicant can Supplement and Amend the applications, as well as appoint the applicant to counsel for the habeas proceedings and DNA Testing

proceeding. Based on the per jury and error by the state, questions the crdibility of those representing the state who have spoken and responded in proceedings pertaining to this case 26185 .TThe applicant prays that this Honorable Court agrees that a Live Evidentiary Hearing is reasonable and entitled to the applicant. Over-all the applicant prays that this Honorable Court have mercy and grant this Motion that has been presented respectfully to this Honorable Court.

EXECUTED ON THIS 15th day of JULY, 2015.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I. Jason Tyrone Pegues #728196, The applicant, being presently confined in Walker County, Texas do hereby affirm that i have delivered the original of this Motion Requesting The Court To Hold HC3 and HC4 For 30 Days so Appldant Can Supplement and Amend The Applications to the prison mallroom officials for delivery to the following via U.S.Postal Service;

THE DISTRICT CLERX, ANNIE REBECCA RLLIOTT OF FORT BEND COUNTY 240th JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT HONORABLE JUDGE THOMAS R.CULVER, III 301 JACKSON STREET RICHMOND, TEXAS 77469

A copy of this Motion has been forwarded to: THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS P.O. Box 12308

Capitol Station Austin, Texas 78711

INHATE DECLARATION

T, JASON TYRONE PECUES #728196, Presently incarcerated in Walker County, Texas hereby declare under the penalty of perjury that the above mentioned in my Motion Requesting The Court To Hold HC3 and HC4 For 30 Days so Applicant Can SupplementaAnd Amend TBe Applications is true and correct.

Signed on this 15 th day of JULY, 2015.