Case Information
*1 RECEIVED
FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS JUL 1 3 2015
NO. 01-14-00158-CR CLERK w r RINE CHRISTO IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON CHRISTI, TEXAS DJ CHRISTOPHER LOWE,
APPELLANT VS. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE MOTION TO WITHDRAW FROM FRIVOLOUS APPEAL TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE COURT OF APPEALS:
COMES NOW, Mark W. Racer, herein referred to as "Movant" in his capacity as
attorney appointed by the trial court to prepare an appeal for the Appellant, DJ CHRISTOPHER LOWE, and submits this Motion to Withdraw from a Frivolous Appeal, and in support thereof would show as follows:
1. On August 15, 2013, in the 400th Judicial District Court of Fort BendCounty, Texas the Defendant waived a trial by jury and entered a plea of guilty to the indictment for delivery of a controlled substance in a drug free zone with intent to deliver. After the punishment phase of trial, the trial court sentenced Defendant to 75 years confinement in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Institutional Division. The trial court appointed Movant to prepare an appeal for Appellant.
*2 2. Movant has diligently searched and thoroughly reviewed the record, and has found no good faith basis upon which to appeal, and has determined that any appeal so advanced would be frivolous and without merit.
3. Attached hereto as Exhibit "A" is a brief that sets out an analysis of the record that will not support error. 4. Attached hereto as Exhibit "B" is a copy of a letter to Appellant that informs him of the right to proceed with an appeal on her own behalf. WHEREFORE, Movant prays that he be allowed to withdraw from this cause and that Appellant be allowed an extension of at least sixty (60) days after the receipt of his copies of the record in order to submit a brief if he should so request.
Respectfully submitted, A<^C~>/US^
Mark W. Racer
Texas Bar No. 16448450 212 E. Burleson Wharton, Texas 77488 (979)531-0322 (979)531-0355 Fax Attorney for Appellant
CERTIFICATE OF DELIVERY
*3 This is to certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Motion to Withdraw has been forwarded to counsel for the State of Texas, Mr. John Harrity, 309 South 4th Street, Suite 258, Richmond, Texas 77469 on this the 20th day of November , 2014.
h^A c^> Mark W. Racer *4 EXHIBIT A *5 NO. 01-14-00158-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS
HOUSTON, TEXAS DJ CHRISTOPHER LOWE, APPELLANT VS. THE STATE OF TEXAS APPELLEE BRIEF FOR APPELLANT Respectfully submitted, Mark W. Racer Texas Bar No. 16448450 212 E. Burleson Wharton, Texas 77488 (979)531-0322
(409) 531-0355 FAX
Attorney for Appellant
IDENTITY OF THE PARTIES
*6 Appellant- Mr. Thomas Phillip Allen Appellee-
The State of Texas
Counsel for Appellant- Mr. Mark W. Racer Texas Bar No. 16448450 212 E. Burleson Wharton, Texas 77488 (979)531-0322
(979) 531-0355 FAX
Counsel for Appellee- Mr. John Harrity 309 South Fourth Street, Suite 258 Richmond, Texas 77469 (281)341-4460 (281) 341-3440 Fax
*7 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. NAMES OF PARTIES 3 2. INDEX OF AUTHORITIES 5 3. STATEMENT OF THE CASE 6 4. ISSUES PRESENTED 7 5. STATEMENT OF FACTS 8 6. SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT 9 7. ARGUMENT 10 8. PRAYER
*8 INDEX OF AUTHORITIES CASES Jacks vs. State, 871 S.W.2d 741 (Tex.Crim.App. 1994) Strickland vs. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984) CONSTITUTION U.S. Constitution Amendment VI Texas Constitution Art. I. Sec. 10
STATUTES
Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 21.02 Texas Penal Code Annotated 12.32
STATEMENT
*9 OF THE CASE This case is a prosecution for aggravated sexual assault of a child. Appellant pled guilty to the offense of aggravated sexual assault of a child on August 15, 2013. (CR 18-27). The Court accepted the Appellant's plea of guilty and set the punishment phase of the trial for December 6, 2013. At the punishment phase of the case the trial court sentenced Appellant to 75 years in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Institutional Division. (RR 13-14).
*10 ISSUES PRESENTED CERTIFICATE OF COUNSEL I, Mark W. Racer, counsel of record for Appellant, DJ Christopher Lowe, do hereby state that I have diligently searched the record in Cause No. 10-DCR-055397, and have researched the law applicable to the facts and issues contained therein, and it is my professional evaluation that no reversible error is reflected in the record. Therefore, I am of the professional opinion that the appeal is without merit and frivolous. In compliance with the applicable law pertaining to appeals of this type, I have set forth no grounds of error that may arguably support an appeal.
I have cause a copy of this brief to be served on the Appellant, accompanied by a letter informing the Appellant of his right to examine the entire appellate record for the purpose of filing a pro se brief. A copy of this letter has been attached to this brief
Mark W. Racer
STATEMENT OF FACTS
*11 Appellant was indicted for aggravated assault of a child. (CR 5). Appellant pled guilty to the offense of aggravated assault of a child on August 15, 2013. (CR 18-25). The Court accepted the Appellant's plea and set the punishment phase of the trial for December 6, 2013. On December 6, 2013 Appellant was sentenced to 75 years in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Institutional Division. (RR 13-14).
SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT
*12 Appellant was arrested and indicted aggravated sexual assault of a child. Appellant pled guilty to the offense ofaggravated sexual assault ofa child. The Court accepted the Appellant's plea and found Appellant guilty. The Court sentenced Appellant to 75 years in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Institutioiial Division. There is no reversible error reflected in the record.
ARGUMENT
*13 Analysis of the pre-trial record Indictment The record contains no objection to the indictment at trial but was examined for error.
The requisites for a valid indictment as set forth in the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, Art. 21.02 are:
Commence with "In the name and by the authority of the State of Texas;" Presented in the district court of Fort Bend County; It was an act of a Fort Bend County grand jury; Contains the name of the accused; Recites the crime was committed within the jurisdiction of Fort Bend County; The date of the crime was prior to the date the grand jury convened; The recited offense tracks the language contained in the Texas Penal Code;
Concludes with "Against the Peace and Dignity of the State"; and
It was signed by the foreman of the grand jury.
The indictment in this cause complied with all of the requirements of Texas Code of
Criminal Procedure, Art. 21.02. There was no error in the indictment.
Analysis of the Trial Record On August .15, 2013, the Appellant changed his plea from "Not Guilty" to "Guilty". (CR
18-25). The legal effect of a voluntary and knowing plea of guilty without a plea bargain is to
waive all non-jurisdictional defects that occur before the entry of the plea. Jack vs. State, 871 *14 S.W.2d 741 (Tex.Crim.App. 1994). If the Appellant wishes to overturn his plea on appeal, he must show that it was not voluntarily given or that he was not properly admonished.
Appellant signed Defendant's Plea of Guilty or Nolo Contendere-Written Admonishments, Waiver of Statutory and Constitutional Rights, and Written Stipulation and Judicial Confession which was also signed by Appellant's attorney, the prosecutor and the trial judge. (CR 19-24). The Appellant affirmed the following to the trial court:
1. That he had fully consulted with his attorney before entering his plea and that he was satisfied that his attorney had properly represented of him. (CR 22); 2. That he had a right to a trial by jury and was giving Up that right. (CR 20); 3. That he was pleading guilty voluntarily and that no one had coerced or
promised the Appellant anything to get him to plead guilty. (CR 22); Appellant's attorney confirmed that Appellant was competent and the Court found him to be competent. (CR 24). The record indicates that the Appellant did receive the proper admonishments. Therefore, a prima facie case is made that the plea was given knowingly and voluntarily. The record contains no facts to support a conclusion that Appellant did not know what he was doing when he entered his plea of "Guilty." No error was found. Analysis of the Trial Record on Punishment
Fairness of the Punishment Appellant was assessed punishment of seventy-five (75) years confinement in the Texas
Department of Criminal Justice-Institutional Division. If a punishment is excessive then such punishment would be cruel and unusual under the Eighth Amendment and the Appellate Court *15 should grant a
new
trial. In the instant case Appellant was charged with aggravated sexual assault
of a child.
The range of punishment for this offense was imprisonment in the institutional
division for
life or any term of not more that 99 years or less than 20 years and a fine not to
exceed
$10,000.00. Tex. Penal Code Ann, 12.32 Vernon's 1994). Texas courts have consistently held that where the trial court sentences a defendant within the statutorily prescribed range, then the punishment is
not
cruel and unusual.
Ineffective assistance of counsel In all
proceedings, a
person is entitled to the assistance of counsel." U.S.Const. Amend.
VI
and Tex.Const.Art I, Sec. 10. In order to prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of
counsel,
the defendant must first show that trial counsel's performance was deficient. Second, the
defendant
must show that this deficient performance prejudiced the defense which requires a demonstration that counsel's errors were so serious as to deprive the defendant of a fair trial. Strickland vs. Washington,
466 U.S.
668 (1984). In this case Appellant pled guilty to the offense
of
aggravated sexual assault of a child. The trial court assessed the punishment of Appellant within the range of punishment for the offense of aggravated sexual assault of a child. There is ho valid claim of ineffective assistance of counsel.
PRAYER
*16 WHERFORE, Appellant respectfully requests that judgment of the trial court be reversed and a new trial granted and any and all relief to which he may be entitled. Respectfully submitted, Mark W. Racer Texas Bar No. 16448450 212 E.Burleson Wharton, Texas 77488 (979)531-0322
(979) 531-0355 FAX
Attorney for Appellant
CERTIFICATE OF DELIVERY
This is to certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing brieffor Appellant has been forwarded to counsel for the State of Texas, Mr. John Harrity, 309 South 4th Street, Suite 258, Richmond, Texas 77469 on this the day of , 2014.
Mark W. Racer
EXHIBIT B
*17 *18 MARK W. RACER ATTORNEY AT LAW
212 E.Burleson Wharton, Texas 77488 (979)531-0322 (979) 531-0355 Fax November 20,2014
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
Mr. DJ Christopher Lowe
TDCJ# 01912512
Telford Unit 3899 Hwy 98 New Boston, Texas 75570
Re: Cause No. 01-14-00158-CR; DJ Christopher Lowe vs. The State of Texas; In The Court of Appeals-First District Dear Mr. Lowe: Enclosed please find a copy ofthe brief that was filed inyour case. Inthese circumstances I have a responsibility to prepare a brief to the Court ofAppeals and advise them ofthe analysis I have made ofthe record onyour behalf. In your case I did not find any error in the record.
1 have also enclosed a Motion to Withdraw which has been sent to the Court of Appeals for review. The justices will examine your case and determine if the brief that I have prepared provided athorough search ofthe record for any possible point oferror. They will also determine if I have drawn the proper conclusion that an appeal would be frivolous. Ifthe Court ofAppeals determines that my brief is inadequate then they may order me to rebrief the case or order the trial court to appoint a new appellate attorney to investigate the record and file a new brief.
On the other hand, if the Court of Appeals agrees with my brief that the record is insufficient to support a point of error, it does not end your right of appeal. You still have a right to receive a copy of your record and prepare your own arguments. I have enclosed a copy of the record in your case.
If you have any other questions please contact us at this address.
Very truly yours,
Mark W. Racer [4] *20 0 -
6 8 X ^ " " [0] T i T 9 4 , [8] v N U O
D N [8] . 3 8 I O [4] o 1 $ A T [7] n 0 0 M P R [7]
A A [0] p H
j l W
J
[2] [0] [0] [7] [7]
— E S N L I A E P P A 5 1 0 2 R P
S
E S A E s E C . D L X N I . O T V . . E A A R a O ~ I . N E V E T R r O . E s S I S F 3 R E . i ~ o P L . P P A X D O 5 1 0 2 N c A r E H T O 1 m T S L A . T P I A O R D E T u I
P S F O E U O L E F U O H T R V O 3 U S C , C N O E I K I J R E T 1 H T H n E R C R S 1 r T P
C U O E O S L R n U O H T U C S J K L I T R R I S H E A R
C L I C M F I I I I s l a e p p
2
A
0 f 0 • o 7 t 7 r u o
s a
C x e t n T s
i r n , i
n n
F
o a F t , s k
u r [1] e o [0] l H
C
[3] [8] [8] [4] [7] [7]
w n s a o r a x e L s e c e T a t l R a r
u , y n B . W e o
n . t E r k r a o r [2] h a t
t [1] W
M
A [2] : y -