Case Information
*1
*2 Beere? Mr. Milel Decette 202502015 Well you pleceer send me a up dated dockette abate. . . Iveit in a motion to be taken back, of the repitention list, because
that D.th, for Haysia County Megally pit, men back on the list, so that motion should still be pendeng. I'm weep for bothertop you
there is this reponts feom D. P. S., yst, I'm still reattop here in prison, so stop question the you is; do you have the reponts weate top Ranap &; Uelspa from the D.P.S. on fite as peets of the evidence? 2 ? Do you have a evidence top you can send me, so that I'll have white all evidence you have? 2 ? Soep, let it d help me if I love. . .
*3
NOTICE
INMATE NOTARY PUBLIC SERVICE
Under both Federal Law (28 U.S.C. § 1746) and State Law (V.T.C.A. Civil Practice &; Remedies Code, &; 132.001-132.003), inmate incarcerated in Texas may use an unsworn declaration under penalty of perjury in place of a written declaration, verification, clarification, oath, or affidavit sworn before a Notary Public. An example of an unsworn declaration is as follows:
Unsworn Declaration
I, Offender 1341683 Mebal Joseph Gray, TDCJ Number 1841683 am presently incarcerated at the Mark W. Stiles Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice in Jefferson County, Texas declare under penalty of perjury that the above is true and correct.
Signed on the February, 20 IS.
*4
*5
- fact: Given the fact in the D.P.S. report which was wrote by Randy S. Ortega, who is the Managing Attorney for the D.P.S. Crime Records Service Legal Support Team (PH*512-424-5841) then is no reasonable juror that would have found Applicant Michael Joseph Gray) guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
- fact: Thanks to the report from the D.P.S., the State (Steve Cowan) now has proof that Applicant is actually innocent Applicant Michael Joseph Gray) has used this report from the D.P.S. to prove beyond a preponderance of evidence that the error of the state contributed to Applicants conviction, and ten years in T.D.C.J. as punishment. See = Ex parte Williams 65 S.W. 3d 656, 658 (Tex. Gr. App 2001).
- fact: Applicant has alleged and praven facts, which are true and entitle him to retist. See = Ex parte Maldonado 688 S.W. 2d 114, 116 (Tex. Gr. App 1985). Also See = Ex parte Richardson, 70 S.W. 3d 865, 870 (Tex. Gr. App 2002).