History
  • No items yet
midpage
Q'Andrew Lynn Shelton v. State
12-15-00002-CR
| Tex. App. | Oct 26, 2015
|
Check Treatment
Case Information

*1

10TH COURT OF APELLS CANEE NO.

QAUDDEL (HN) SHETD), APELLANI, PLED IN COURT OF APEALS THE 12TH COURT OF APEALS VS THE STATE OF TEXAS, APELLEE

TODDIN FOR LEALE TO SUPERMEST APELLANTS RESPONSE TO ANDERS DRIEF TO HONDRAble JUDIEE OFSAD COURT: QAUDDEL (HN) SHETDIN, APELLANI, PLELES FOR AN EXTENDED SO THAT HE MAY SHERE MEST HIS PRO SE DRIEF:

J

PURSHANT TO &; ADDIICTI. APELLANI PLELES THIS COURT TO ALIGN AN EXTENDED) OF THIRDY (35) DANS TO FILE A SHIREMESTAL AND OF ATENADED DRIEF. ON DECEMBER 11, 2014 APELLANT WAS CONJUTED OF THE OFFENSE OF REGESSION OF COURRULED SUBSTANE IN A DRUG FREEDONE AND SEVTEWEDTO SO YEARS TOCI. ON JANUARY 5,2015 NOTICE OF APEAL WAS GIVEN. ON DECEMBER 11,2014 APELLANI WAS AREDURED ANSTIN REEVE JACUSON. ON MY R. COIS SARD APELLANI COURREL FULED A AND SUBMUTED A ANDERS DRIEF IN THE MAIER. APELLANIS PRO SE DRIEF, AND A MUSION FOR LEALE TO FILE LIFE PRO SE DRIEF WAS FIILED AND GRANFED DY THE 12TH COURT OF APEALS ON OTHNER 8,2015.

II

REQUIRED INFORMATION PURSHANT TO THE RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE A. THE DEADLINE FOR FILLING THE SHIREMESTAL DRIEF: ANI TIME DEFERE SHIRESSION! B. THE LENGTH OF THE EXTENsSIGN SOLVHT? THIRDY (35) DANS.

  1. BADDIICTI.
  2. TEX.R.ARP.P.ID.S(D)C(D)D).

*2 C. THE FACTS RELIED UED TO REASONADU EXPLAIN THE NEED FOR THE EXTENSIAN?3

UFOU RECEIVENG THE ANDERS BRIEF ON MY 13 JUN I WAS REVICH WARRANIED TO THE ( SniAl ) COULTHY JAIL, I COULD NOT GET A PERFER TIME FRAME TO SUGH THIS MATTER, I AM NOT PARTICIAR WITH LEGAL WOOL AND I HAVE JUST RECEIVENY SINCE PON RETURN TO TOOL DETO WAST, MEET THE COMMON KNOWLEDGE OF HOW THIS WORDS, I NOW MAKE THE HELP OF A TARL HOUSE LAWYER WAND IS HELPING THE PUBLLE THIS FICULT TO ARTEAL CORRECTU AND NOT FRIHOLDING. HERE RECEIVEN, I FILED A MISTING FOR EXCULBATING AND IMPREN MEST EXTENCE AND FOR GRAND JUNY PROGESTINGS AND JURNS LIFORINATION. ACHOUGH THIS MISTING IS A MISTING DIRECTED TO THE TOTAL JUDGE, ASKING THE JUDGE TO ORDER THE SITCH COULTH DISTRICT ATDRAWES OFFICE TO TURN DIFER HIS FILES REGAREING ANY EXCLLBATING EXTDEMCE, INCLUDING INTERNAL AFFAIRS INVESTIGATIONS OF ARRESTING OFFICERS WHO ARRESTED AND TESTIFIED IN THE STATES REHALL I RECIEMED ALETTER "SEE ATTACHED EFFICIT" ON LOIS ROGERS, SITCH COURY DISTRICT CLEAR,3 STATED THE REWUEST ED DOCUMENTS ARE NOT IN THE COURS FILE. HOWEVER, THE MISTING DID NOT ASK THAT THE " CLEAR TURN DIFER DOCUMENTS, OUT RATIER THAT THE DISTRICT ATDRAWEN" DO SO. ARRELANT NEEDS TIME TO ADDRESS THIS MATTER TO THE TOTAL JUNGE.

SUBDITING CASE LAW AS QWORES FOLIOUS. WHEN AN ARRELANT HAS BEEN DENTED AN EFFECTIVE DIFERINATY TO PRESENT AN ARRELLATE CHEM THRUGH NO FAVCT OF THE ARRELANT, THE PERFER REMEDIS TO RETURN ARTICAIT TO THE PRUT AT WHECH ATTMED NOTICE OF ARTEAL CAN CE ETHEN [RESTAS USATE, 214 SNO34,4 CRESTRIAL APT 2001 DEFEAGANT DENTED FICULT TO ARTEAL BECANEE HE WAS DEPTIVED OF TOTAL COURT RELANS AND COULD NOT RESPOND TO ANDERS BRIEF FILED ON ARPELATED ARRELLATE CONSEL SEE 990.06 . IN ADDITION, CONSEL IN ANDERS BRIEF STATES THERE ARE NO ARCHERIE GROUNDS RELATINGTO WORRE BRIEF, ARRELLANT HAS NO INFORMATION OF THE JUDGES IN THE RECORDS (ARRELLATE) PROVIDED THIS, HAS REWUEST INFORMATION THRUGH THE MISTING MESTIDUED ADDIE. D. NUMBER OF PERVIDNS EXTENSIANS GRANFED FOR PERVIDNS MISTING FOR EXTENSIANS. 2 3. TEX R. APP. 10.5 (DOCDCC) 4. TEX R. APP.P. 10.5 (B) (D) (C)

*3

III

THE ADDITIONAL TIME REGUESTED IS NOT SOMENT FOR DELAY, NOT SOMENT PERSONAL, OUT WILL BE OF GENURNE ASSISTANCE TO PREPARE A PROFER RESPONSE TO ANDERS BRIEF.

PRAIER

AMELLAN PRANS THAT THE COURT GRAUT THIS MOTION AND PRODIDY AND GOTEND THE DEADLINE FOR FILLING A BRIEF TO NOVEMBER 26.205, OR THAT THIS COURT GRAUT SUCH ADDITIONAL TIME AS IS JUST AND PROFER.

RESPECTRALLY SUMMUTED y C. 1 H. 1 H. 2 H. 2 H.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

A COPY OF THIS MOTION WAS SEAT BY MAIL TO SMITH COURY DISTRICT AMERICH'S OFFICE ON 10-26-15

X C. 1 H. 2 H. 2 H. 2 H. 2 H.

ID-26-15 DATE

EXHERENT ATTACHED.

*4

OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT CLERK SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

Date: 16 -114-15

Re: Cause Number 114-0-194-14

Dear Mr./Ms. Sreltem

Your request for copies is $ 1.00 per page. Total cost for copies is contact the Court Reporter listed below to request copies of court transcripts and fees Name: Address:

The following instrument has been filed in the above listed case(s). Your request/motion has been GRANTED/DENIED ✓ other: The documents you are requesting are not contained within the courts file

Sincerely, Lois Rogers, Smith County District Clerk 100 N. Broadway, Tyler, Texas 75702 By: OK DRA

April Fox, Deputy

Case Details

Case Name: Q'Andrew Lynn Shelton v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Oct 26, 2015
Docket Number: 12-15-00002-CR
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.