History
  • No items yet
midpage
Charles Blake Defore v. State
12-15-00074-CR
| Tex. App. | Oct 16, 2015
|
Check Treatment
Case Information

*0 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 10/16/2015 12:21:29 PM PAM ESTES Clerk *1 ACCEPTED 12-15-00074-CR TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 10/16/2015 12:21:29 PM Pam Estes CLERK ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED

CAUSE NO. NO. 12-15-00074-CR IN THE

COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER, TEXAS __________________________________________________________________

CHARLES BLAKE DEFORE, Appellant VS.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee __________________________________________________________________

Appeal in Cause No. 31070 On Appeal from the Third Judicial District Court of Anderson County, Texas __________________________________________________________________

BRIEF FOR STATE __________________________________________________________________

Scott C. Holden 1 st Asst. Criminal District Attorney Anderson County, Texas Anderson County Courthouse Palestine, Texas 75801 Texas Bar No. #24036795 903/723-7400 i

IDENTITY OF PARTIES AND COUNSEL JUDGE PRESIDING:

THE HONORABLE BASCOM W. BENTLEY III

DEFENDANT/APPELLANT:

CHARLES BLAKE DEFORE

FOR THE DEFENDANT:

APPELLATE ATTORNEY

COLIN MCFALL

513 N. CHURCH ST.

PALESTINE, TEXAS 75801

TRIAL COUNSEL

JEFF HERRINGTON

509 N. CHURCH ST.

PALESTINE, TX 75801

FOR THE STATE:

SCOTT C. HOLDEN

1 ST ASSISTANT CRIMINAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY

ANDERSON COUNTY COURTHOUSE

500 N. CHURCH STREET, RM. 38

PALESTINE, TX 75801

sholden@co.anderson.tx.us

(903) 723-7400

ii *3 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Identity of Parties and Counsel . . . . . . . ii

Table of Contents . . . . . . . . . iii

Index of Authorities . . . . . . . . iv

Statement of the Case . . . . . . . . 1

Issues Presented . . . . . . . . . 1

Statement of Facts . . . . . . . . . 1

Summary of Argument . . . . . . . . 2

State’s Reply to Appellant’s Point of Error 1 . . . . 2-5

Prayer . . . . . . . . . . 5

Certificate of Service . . . . . . . . 6

Certificate of Word Count . . . . . . . 6

iii *4 INDEX OF AUTHORITIES Cases Page

Jones v. State , 795 S.W.2d 199 (Tex. Crim. App. 1990) . . 3

Parks v. State , 960 S.W.2d 234 (Tex.App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 1997, pet. ref'd)

. . . . . . . . . . . . 3

Villela v. State , 564 S.W.2d 750 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978) . . 2,3

iv *5

STATEMENT OF THE CASE The Statement of the case is as stated in appellant’s brief page 6. The Reporter’s Record will be referred to as “V1, V2, etc.” unless otherwise

noted. The Clerk’s Record will be referred to as “CR1” or “CR2”.

Appellant’s Brief will be referred to as “AB” unless otherwise noted.

Appellee is referred to as “State”.

ISSUES PRESENTED POINT OF ERROR 1:

Appellant contends the trial court failed to adjudicate appellant guilty prior to sentence rendering the judgment void.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

Are as stated in Appellant’s brief.

SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT POINT OF ERROR 1 RESTATED:

Appellant contends the trial court failed to adjudicate appellant guilty prior to sentence rendering the judgment void.

ARGUMENT The court memorializing the sentence in the written judgment and the finding appellant guilty is sufficient.

STATE’S REPLY TO APPELLANT’S POINT OF ERROR: When the trial court conducts a hearing on the adjudication of guilt and then holds the assessment of punishment in abeyance and orders a

presentence investigation, the court necessarily implies that it has found the

defendant guilty. Villela v. State , 564 S.W.2d 750, 751 (Tex. Crim. App.

1978). The court of criminal appeals has observed that beyond the

pronouncement of sentence "no further ritual or special incantation from the

bench is necessary to accomplish an adjudication of guilt." Jones v. State ,

795 S.W.2d 199, 201 (Tex. Crim. App. 1990). Further, a written judgment

is valid even in the absence of an express oral pronouncement of guilt by the

trial court. Parks v. State , 960 S.W.2d 234, 238 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st

Dist.] 1997, pet. ref'd) (citing Villela v. State , 564 S.W.2d 750, 751 (Tex.

Crim. App. 1978)).

In the case at bar, the trial court held hearings on both cause numbers 31070 and 31077 at the same time. Witnesses testified to the facts alleged in

both motions to adjudicate and at the conclusion of the hearings. At the

conclusion of the motion to adjudicate hearing the trial court affirmatively

stated, “I find the allegations, including the allegation of failure to report the

arrest, to be true. All the allegations as amended from the testimony are

granted.” (V2, P28, L17-20) Clearly granting the State’s Motions to

Adjudicate.

The trial court continued, “Mr. DeFore, in Cause Number 31,077, the Court hereby finds and adjudge you guilty as charged ofthe offense of

manufacturing a controlled substance.” The trial court then stated:

In Cause Number 31,077, the Court hereby finds and adjudges you guilty as charged of the offense of manufacture and delivery of a controlled substance.

Now, folks, what about Count 2? I didn't -- I didn't address Count 2. I grant the motion as to Count 2. The evidence was sufficient to support it, as well. Same and all *8 shall be the order and judgment of this Court. So ordered. (V2, P28-29, L21-7)

It should be noted that both cause 31070 and 31077 had as their initial charge of manufacture and delivery of controlled substances. Clearly the

trial court was adjudicating appellant guilty of both charges in both cases

and misspoke the cause number.

This is show later in the sentencing hearing the court pronounced “All right.

Having found and adjudged you guilty in both of these causes, I hereby

assess your punishment in both causes to 30 years in the Institutional

Division of the Texas Department of Corrections.” (V2, P36, L6-10) and the

judgment in this cause reflects the appellant was sentenced to 30 years.

(CR117) as does the docket sheet. (CR120)

The trial court clearly adjudicated the defendant guilty and sentenced him to 30 years TDCJ. The judgment should stand.

PRAYER WHEREFORE the Appellee prays that the Court upon consideration

hereof affirm the decision of the Trial Court and overrule Appellant’s Point

of Error.

Respectfully submitted by, SCOTT C. HOLDEN 1 st Asst. Criminal District Attorney Anderson County, Texas Anderson County Courthouse 500 N. Church Street, RM 38 Palestine, Texas 75801 Texas Bar No. #24036795 (903)723-7400 *10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true copy of the foregoing Brief for the State has been delivered via fax/email to: Colin McFall on this the 16 th day of

October, 2015, in accordance with the provisions of the Texas Rules of

Criminal and Appellate Procedure.

___________________________________ SCOTT C. HOLDEN, 1 ST ASSISTANT CRIMINAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY CERTIFICATE OF WORD COUNT I also certify that the entire word count of the State’s reply brief is 1081

words.

___________________________________ SCOTT C. HOLDEN, 1 ST ASSISTANT CRIMINAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY

Case Details

Case Name: Charles Blake Defore v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Oct 16, 2015
Docket Number: 12-15-00074-CR
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
Read the detailed case summary
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.