Case Information
*1
RE:MURPHY, THOMAS LAMONT
CGA No. WR-35,660-03 Trial Court Case No. N93-40746-N(g)
Dear Honorable Clerk please find inside a (Motion for REBUTTAL TO THE TRIAL COURTS FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW).
RECEIVED IN COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS NOV 302015
Abel Acosta, Clerk
SINCERELY,
Shona Lament Mw!
*2 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-35,660-03 W93-40746-N(C) IN THE 195th Judicial Diatrict Court of Dallas County, Texas
Fotitioner's Rebuttal to The Trial Court's Findings of Fact And Conclusions of Law
To The Honorable Court of Criminal Appoala.
Come now Ex parte Thomas Lamont Murphy, Potitioner TDCJ-ID#644742, and submita his objections to the Trial Court's Findings of Fact and Conclualons of Law. The Pattitioner would also like to state this is a Supplonented Motion as well.
Pro Se Status A Pro Se complaint is held to lesa atringant otandardg than formal papers drafted by Lavyers. Balnes v Korner 404 u.s. 519. At bar Pettitioner is filing pro so, as a Layman at Law, and as auch the Pettitioner requesting relles must be construed liberally deapite formal imperfections, Roldan v, Racette, 984 P. 26 85.
Supplemented Motion This Motion is to Supplement prior Motion of Petitioner's rebuttal to the State'a Reapone dated October 13, 2015 to this said Court.
Pettitioner's Objection (1) The Trial Court has inter a Jla Hammond affidavit as the findings of facts most important subject. Mr Jim Hammond is a Investlgator for the Court and in his affidavit he said's that Mr Walton denied all knowledge of the affidavit the Pettitioner has with Mr Walton signature on It. Now the Court motion that Mr Jim Hammond is trustworthy and that may by true but in the court of law trustworthy anit good anuffe when a mana live is on the line. A affidavit from Mr Reco Walton stating his denial of the said affidavit that the Pettitioner has place'd in with his 1107 Application. Not just the word of a Investigator for the state.
*3
The Petitioner is a innocent man being held illegally by the state of Texas. Petitioner hope this honorable court accept his claims and grant him all relief deemed appropriate. Evon with him having to navigate Critical stage of the proceeding against him without the aid of an Attorney, Dedicated to the protection of his clients rights under our adversarial system of justice' U.S. vs Swenson, 943 F2d 1070,1075 (9th CIC,1991). Every provision relating to the writ of haboas corpus shall be as favorablely construed in order to give effect to the remedy an protect the rights of the person seeking relief under it. C.C.P ART. 11.04
Unaworn Declaration
-11. THOMAS LAMBHT MURPHY TOCJ-1D#644742. Presontly incarcerated in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice Mark 11, Stiles unit Declare under the penalty of perjury that the above and foregoing is true an correct.
RESPECTPULLY SUBMITTED
2015.
*4
Pretitioner prays that this Honorable Court of Criminal Appeals sustains his objections and that unresolved facts be resolved.
Certificate of Service
I, hereby certify that on the above date a true and correct copy of Petitioner's Rebuttal to the Trial Courts findings of Facts and Conclusion of Law was mailed through the United States post office to Gray Fitzsimmons (Dallas County District Clerk), AND Susan Hawk (Dallas County District Attorney) in Dallas County texas. and also to the clerk of criminal appeals of Texas. On 11-20-2015