Bennett, Cameron Bernard v. State
PD-1180-15
| Tex. | Dec 2, 2015
Case Information

*1 ON PSTRIING FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEN FROM THE DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPERLE FOR THE SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS, AT FAST NORTH, TEXAS IN CASE NUMBER, L332565D, HON, RUBEN GENERALER, AFFIRMAN'S APPALLANTS CONVIOUS AND SENTRELLS IN THE MATTER, PRESIDING FROM THE CERMAL DISTRICT COURT NUMBER, Y332665D OF TREMAN CONTINU, TEXAS.

APPELLANTS PESTITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEN.

CANERON BENNETT ORD 444 THERMNT CONTINU, JAL

LOD HORTH LAMME STREET FORT NORTH, TEXAS, T6186

THIAL ATTORNEY WILLIAM RIVK 722 MAH ST. (SUTE 6DD) FORT NORTH, TX 76102

APPELLANTS PRo-SE

*2

TARLE OF CONTEXIST

INDEX OF AUTHENTIES

STATEMENT RESEARCHS ORAL ARRUMENT 2 STATEMENT OF THE CASE STATEMENT OF PROCEDURAL HISTORY 4 Grandp FIR REVIEN REVIEN FAR REVIEN 6 REVIEN FAR REVIEN 7 CONTITUNS OF CONTLANCE 3 CONTINUNS OF SERVIC 9 ARRADIY

*3

ZUDER OF AUTROBETES

  1. AFTER 571.002 OF TEXAT HEALTH AND SAFETY CASE AND ANW 634.017
  2. DETRECCE V. STRIES, 542 S. W. 23150 , 159 (TEX. CArm AAP)
  3. HEXETER (5 STRIES, 339, S.W. 33, 11, 1, 129 (TEX. CArm AAP. 3031 .
  4. JACKSON, 857 S. W. 23.678 TEX. AAP. - HENSTON 14th DIST
  5. MITTHEL, 762 S. W. 23, 916 TEX. AAP. - SAN ANTENA
  6. HUGEZ, 942 S. W. 2357 TEX. AAP. - COREUS CHELUT.
  7. UNITED STATES V.S. WESTON, 255732573 C.D.A.
  8. STRIKLAND US NASHINGTON, 466 U.S. 668,104 S.C. 2052.801.6223667
  9. TEX. ANEXIAN DISTANIUNY ACT.
  10. WOODS, 59 S.W. 38833 TEX. AAP. - TEX.ANTHA

*4 STANZMENT REPANDS ORAL ASSIGNER

APHICANT REPUEST THAT THE CAVE OF CERMAL APPEARS MAULE HIS OAL ARRIVERS; AMERICAN STRENSTY FEDS THAT THE REPUESS SPARK FOR PRESIDENTE, AMERICANTS MEDICAL STRENSTY MENTALLY I LU" CHEMALY DERMONDANCE THE CAVE'S LABE OF INCLUDING MITTENTEN'S CIRCUNSENCE CONSIDERATION, DIS'TO CAVE'S APPASSIVE ADVANCES FALVEE TO TARVE THE NESSASY EUDRENCE MEDICAL HISTORY.

STATEMENT OF CASE

THE EXTRES WATERS OF THE CASE CAVALUATED FROM A MEDAMERICA CHANGE OF THEY, DUE TO THEY MINOR USUES OF PREPETY AND THE AMERICANTS MEETING STARS AT TIME OF OFFERED AMERICANTS FEDS HES USUALS MALE BOT A LESSE AMYANT OF TIME.

STATEMENT OF PROCEDURE HISTORY

THE CAVE OF APPEARS ISSUED IT'S DECISION OF ASSUST, BERTH, SOIS, APPENDANTS FRICTED FOR DISTRICTUNAIY REVIEW IS TIMELY FILED ON OF BETTERS NOVEMBER, 22th, 2015.

*5

Gravids For Review A) INETESTIVE ASTURACR OF COUNSEL: Cover Measured ATTURNEY FVLAS 70 PESENT MITTSTONS CIRCUMSTANCES OF APPLLANT MAUTAL ILLNESS. B) MITTSTONS CIRCUMSTANCES/EXECUTORIAL CIRCUMSTANCES COOLS have had A MAJOR IMPACT ON THE SATIVACING PRASE ALEAVING THE APPLICANT 70 RECIEVE CONTINUION From THE COURT.

ARPUMENT

THE APPLLANT should have BEEN PRANTERS THE OPERALWITY TO RECEAT this MAUTAL HELVE ARTERY. THE COURT believed in NOT TARING IT INTS CONSIDERATION AT TIME OF SETIVACING. THEES WERE OTHER ORDANE THEY should have BEEN CONSIDERAL, ESPECIALLY GUYEN THE APPLICANT SLAV (6) MAUTES IN THE SOMEE MAUTAL HASITAL DUE TO his NCOMPETENCES DURING THE CARS. YET THE COURT AMINATED ATTURNEY failed to ACOUVE THE WESTERN RECIEVE TO PRESIDT A UAL. 2 ADVINGT DURING SATIVACING. THEES ARE URGING MAUTAL HELVE RECEEAMS THE APPLICANT did SURVIVY FOR. THE US A MEASURLY ISL APPLICANT THEY should NOT MUCH LESSER TIME FOR A PRIVENE CASE. APPLICANT WAS ULTINATED SALVANCED 70 (7) JEANES IN THE DEPT OF CORRECUMSAL FACILITY.

*6

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

LONDRETEEC, PENNEST CONSIDERED, ATHICANT PAALS THIS THIS CELLS REVERS THE CELLS OF ADVANDS AND BEAMSAD THIS CASE FOR PULSITER PROCEDURES TO THE TRIAL CELLS FOR A SENTRICUSY HAPPING IN WYKICH MOTIVATING ISSUES WILLISE CONSIDERED FOR THE PRESIDULTY OF LETINGY AND OF COMPARISON.

CERTELAND PRO-SE

CERTURS OF CERTELANCES

Resuant to Rule 7, 1963 of the TEXM Rule OF AMERICAN PROCEDURE. THE TOTAL OF NCHRSE OF ANGEY WHEN HAND WRITTEN IN THE RETRIOGE FOR DISCOCTALARY REVIEW AND WITH A CERTIFULATE OF SERVICE FOLLOWER.

CERTIFULAT OF SERVICE

T. CERTELW REINSTT, ATPICANY, PRO-SE, CERTIFY THAT IN THE 26th dAY OF WAGONNER HOLS A TRUE COPY OF THE FRECOUNY WAS SEVERE ON THE FOLLOWING.

*7 The Cases of Criminal Affairs of recent Past Office Box 12309 (Cf clerk) CM/Md STANN Auston, Texas, 78211

Cour of Affairs (Cf clerk) Second District of recent 401 West Belknap (Sute 900e) Foer North, Texas, 76196

District Attainable Office 40 Chafles in Mail (Aftollant Section) 401 West Belknap Foer North, Texas, 76196

District Court Clark 40 Tom Widder 401 West Belknap Foer North, Texas, 76196

Census Benefit Afflentor House

Novembre - 20th - 2015 DATE

*8 APPENDIY

JOB9MEHT/OPNION OF COURT OF APPEMIS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Rare SE apitched JOB9MEHT

*9

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-15-00262-CR

Cameron Bernard Bennett § From the 432nd District Court § of Tarrant County (1387365D) v. § August 28, 2015 § Per Curiam The State of Texas § (nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS PER CURIAM

*10

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00262-CR

CAMERON BERNARD BENNETT APPELLANT V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

FROM THE 432ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. 1387365D

MEMORANDUM OPINION [1]

In exchange for the State's offer of seven years' confinement, Appellant Cameron Bernard Bennett pled guilty and judicially confessed to theft of property under $ 1 , 500 and two prior convictions. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 31.03(a), (e)(4)(D) (West Supp. 2014). He also pled true to the enhancement paragraph elevating his punishment range to that of a second-degree felony based on two

*11

prior felony convictions. See id. § 12.425(b) (West Supp. 2014). Appellant waived all pretrial motions and all rights of appeal.

The trial court followed the plea bargain, convicted Appellant of the offense, and sentenced him to seven years' confinement, awarding credit for time served. The trial court signed a certification stating that the case was a pleabargain case and Appellant had "NO right of appeal" and that Appellant had waived the right of appeal.

Appellant filed his notice of appeal on July 27, 2015. On August 3, 2015, we informed Appellant of the contents of the certification and stated that we could dismiss the appeal unless, on or before August 13, 2015, he or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d), 44.3.

On August 6, 2015, Appellant filed a "Motion for Extension of Time for Appellant to File his Appeal Brief." It does not show grounds for continuing the appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 43.2(f). We also deny Appellant's motion as moot to the extent that it requests any additional relief.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MEIER, JJ. DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b) DELIVERED: August 28, 2015

*12

3

[Defendant's Name], Defendant Pro Se CID D22444 DOB 8011959 100 N. Lamar St. Fort Worth, TX 76102-1954

*13

Verification of Unaworn Deelaration

TANEMAN BENNET

Defendam pro se in this cause, state the following under penalty of perjury: I am a prisoner BADYHY currently incarcerated in the Tarrant County jail in Tarrant County, Texas I am duly qustified and authorized in all respects to make this declaration. I have read the foregoing. REYING FOR DISERCTIONS

REVIEND

and declare that I have personal knowledge of the facts contained therein and said facts are true and correct.

EXECUTED in Tarrant County, Texas, pursuant to Am 132.001 et seq., Texas C.P.R.C. and 28 USC $ 1746 , on this 20 day of HONEMBERG, IS

Common Beinle

Signature; Defendant pro se CAMERIC BENNETT (From Nams; CID 00244 DOB 8:21952 160 North LAMNE Street Adderic FOOT WORTH TEXAS, 76186 *Under both federal law ( 28 USC $ 1746 ) and state law (Art. 132.001, Texas C.P.R.C.), inmates incarcerated in Texas may use an unsworn declaration under penalty of perjury in place of a written declaration sworn before a notary public.

*14

NOTES

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.