History
  • No items yet
midpage
BAKER, MILTON Jr.
WR-48,376-07
| Tex. | Nov 17, 2015
|
Check Treatment
Case Information

*1

48,31007

48,31007

48,31007

The Honorable Coust of dustice

The Honorable Coust of dustice

The Honorable Coust of dustice

The Honorable Coust of dustice

The Honorable Coust of dustice

The Honorable Coust of dustice

The Honorable Coust of dustice

The Honorable Coust of dustice

The Honorable Coust of dustice

The Honorable Coust of dustice

*2

II.

Eliatoc contends that he tars wo other adequate tenedy to see. Eedess for Hieced egee by teal coues. Eliatoc contends that teal coues failed to develop the seave, inolving inerectue of counsel by refidauit, Eelatoe contends that he teal counsel denied him a flie teal by denving him the 2 th Firendment fights to a duk teal but instead forced him to sign a fad Dargain thesement, dagin'f his will: The 2 th Fintendment states that a Dekendant shall enjoy the fight to a seedy and Public teal by on impartial duy of the state. Eilatoc had wo understanding to the fad fesement. Eliatoc contends that without a teal it could be considered what cause the death of clemmie yates Beau. If a teal was conducted the Seult ocoud have been different, because the deeeged was not - in the seattelt, which caused hee to go theugh the front windahiekeg 2 which caused the death.

*3 Relative ossest this coust that a reading ucould have been sufficient, in this case. III.

Relative conends that the teal coust foiled to lessow the issue betueen teal coureel and the Relative by Priladutt, Relative contend that a orthodunt would have determine why coureel denied Relative a duly teal and cony would a oed roegain would tivule been better for Relative, would coureel been uoong for not giving Relative a duly teal, after the root the teal caused of the victim death value was alsclose because Relative was denied a duly teal. Teal coust failed to relloug the Article. II. 07 Procedure Guidelines.

Real coust failed to conduct a Uletten finding of foot of Uletten Opinion to the Pettitio

*4 According to Per. II. 07 SEC. 4 AZ This is preponderance of evidence, that the dececed was not wearing the sentent during the accident, if a real was conducted with the feucrable evidence to stout that, relative did not intentionally hit the dececed, but she was elected from the case because no sentent was usefi.

Passer 8 Relative Milton Poker, Jr., Prose perfectfully legers a finding that real court (respondent) did not resolve the issue, nor conduct an affidavit. Relative prays that this court would demand the case back for further development.

Page 9

*5

NOU. 12,2015

Deaf CekK Ficord,

Dease findenclosed a morion for Writ of Mandamus. Please Pile with the Honorable Cour, I thank you for your ciuessine seauices.

I COCK Reaciced heaking From You.

Yours teuly,

KAHOU BAKER DE.

# 1763912

Case Details

Case Name: BAKER, MILTON Jr.
Court Name: Texas Supreme Court
Date Published: Nov 17, 2015
Docket Number: WR-48,376-07
Court Abbreviation: Tex.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.