Case Information
*1
81,
Aduemalrea 1st, 2015
RECEIVED IN
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
ADOIAcOsta,Clork
Rustina, IX 18711
2118-81, 750-03
Dear men Acosta,
I am uniting you in regards of any current situation. The Criminal canot of appeal's gave the 8 th Judicial Distric canot of Hoptima County, Texas, a 90 dasy period to fill the fiedings of fact and Conclusion of dau Hukithuas due cetolies 27th, 2015) The canot of appeals also ordered the tuial canot to have tial counsel respond to applicants clains of ineffective assistance of counsel.
*2 The Caut of appeals padend that Counsel shall specifically state whether the police aflic eas in their affidauits in support of the anest unkrant falsely stated that they had uistressed the actual trans fea of daugs betueen Applicant and the Confidential ind amant The court of appeals also aadered that counsel shall state whether he considered requesting a raantes hearing of flling a motion to suppress or this 9 sasts. At is appellants contentions that halume 5 gages 173 - 176 of the tait transcripts, tait Counsel made R. Farsman a aajed that the accusation against the defendant was false so halume 5 page 173 lines of the trial transcripts At is appellants contention that halume 5 page 175 lines 18 - 25 trial counsel mention the state claiming an actual transfer was made to "C" Jatn Ellis
*3 Homeries, trial Counsel did not pussue the case under Yarnes V. Delmase, and challenge the affidant that was use to obtain a hiarant for applicants amest, and because of this matter trial counsel rendered himself ineffective. I would like to krown what needs to be done to make trial court comply with the appeals court written order. A has the trial court as for a time extension? I thank you in advance for your attention to this request.
Slycerely True, Cearyll Aluay
