Case Information

*1 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL In the court of criminaL APPEALS IN SENRICK WIIKERSON

ALREOBIYERIAN COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS MOTION REQUESTING TO REVERSE CONVICIION FOR NEVER- TAKEL TO A MAGISTRATE VIOLATION OF ARTICLE ISIT

TO THE HONORABLE JUGGES OF SAID COURT: ADOLECQS, CIERK

CONES NOUG, SENRICK WIIKERSON, the APPILCHNT in the styled above number cause, and files this his, motion prose, requesting to reverse conviction for never taken to a magistrate, violating Article 15.17 code of Criminal Procedure, respectfully showing to the Court as follows:

Applicant was never once taken before a magistrate, never once given any opportunity to post bail, never informed of any rights to an examining trial or counselor, never arrested, never arraigned, and never once participated in any first preliminary initial appearances, for FIG-OUB3 Sexual Performance by a Child &; FIGOLBY Sexual Assault on a Child, as is required by Texas Law. See Art. 15.17 Code CIIm. Proa.; Sanders V. City of Houston S. D., Tex. 1982,543 F. Supp. 644; Perry V. Jones CA. S.C. Tex. 1975, 506 F. 28 778.

In the Texas State Counsel for Offenders Legal Handbook, chapter 4-107it of Habeas Corpus, page 86; under 4.8 Questions Offenders often ask specifically show the following:

• No. 3: "CAN I GET MY CONVICIION REVERSED SINCE I WAS NEVER TAKEN TO A MAGISTRATE?"

Answer: "Even through it is required that every arrest suspect be advised of his rights and be taken before a magistrate, the failure by police to follow such rules results in reversible error only if an involuntary confession or illegally seized evidence is obtained as adirect result of such failure. Gезlein V. Aush. 420 U.S. 103,95 S.Ct. 854 (975); Perry V. Texas, 456 F. 2d 874 (54 Cir. 1972)."

It must be repeated under penalty of perjury that Applicant was never once arrested, and never once arraigned for cause nos. FIGOLB3 and FIGOLBY.

DECLARATIONS OF SENRICK WIIKERSON

"I, SENrick WIIKERSON, TDES NO. 1885146, do state that these Page 1 of 3

*2 Following facts are true in the above cases: I was never once arrested and never once arraigned for cause Nos. FIDOUS3 &; FIO-OI8Y, despite of these following four (9), different fraudulently falsified arrest dates that are shown by Dallas County District Clerk's office:

1. The JUDGMENT OF CONVIOUS BY JUAY &; NONCE OF EXPOSITOUS documents shows the arrest date as $917/2008$ .
2. U.S. magistrate judge Jeff Kaplan stated that I was arrested in September of 2010; See 3:11-61-00559-8, page ID 53.
3. The Judicial Information &; Criminal History Records documents show an arrest date as $12117/2010$ .
4. The copies arrest warrants show the arrest date as Dec 23, 2010. The State cannot produce any Arrest Reports, offense reports, probable cause info, police investigation info, grand jury minutes, magistrate minutes, arraignment info, or first preliminary initial appearance information for cause Nos. FIO-OI83 &; FIO-OI8Y. Therefore, the state never had any jurisdiction over both fraudulently falsified cases above. The Records are totally incomplete, and the indestments were fraudulently forged by prosecutor Brooke &;. Grona-RAlds.

I, Sennick Wilkinson, being presently illegally incarcerated in the Ramsey I Unit, declare under penalty of perjury, that the facts stated above are true."

It must be repeated that Dallas County District Attorney's office is showing four (9) different fraudulently falsified arrest dates from FIO-OI83 Sexual Performance by a Child &; FIO-OI8Y Sexual Assault on a child, but the State cannot produce any probable cause; any complaint affidatits; any Police investigations; any arrest reports; any arraignment information; and any first preliminary initial appearances for both fainted and falsified sex offenses, as is required by Texas Law, Tex. Code Crim. P. Ann art. 15.17 requires that an arrested person shall without unnecessary delay be taken before some magistrate of the county in which the arrest dates place; this duty is to be performed by the person making the, or he shall have it done. A failure of the arresting officer in this regard may give rise to an action for false imprisonment. See Moore V. State 149 Tex. Crim. 229, 193 S10, 2d 204 (1946), Heath V. Bead 141 Tex. 549, 175 S10, 2d 219 (1943), King V. Patents 49 S10, 2d 991 (1932), 125 Tex. 623,84 S10, 2d 718. Belief must be granted, Page 2 of 3.

*3

WheReFdRE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Applicant prays that the Court of Criminal order a reversal for applicant never once being arrested, never once being a majored, and never once been taken before any magistrate judge for cause NOs. F10-01163 & F10-01164.

Respectfully submitted, SENRUCK, L. J. LKERSONALPROSE, TOCJ. MA. 1885144, RANNEY I. UNIT 1100 F11A.655 7E-2-177 Rostaton, TX 77583

CERTIFICATE OF SEANCE

I hereby certify that antique 5,205, the foreseping document has been U.S. mailed to: Court of Criminal Appeals, P.A. Box 12308, Austin, Texas 78711.

Pag3of3