History
  • No items yet
midpage
Wilkerson, Senrick Shern
WR-77,138-29
| Tex. App. | May 19, 2015
|
Check Treatment
Case Information

*1 ANIT NO. W08-60213-3(D) 77, 138-99 EX PARTE SENRICK WILKERSON

IN THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT No 3 DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS RECEIVED IN APPLICANT'S DISIECTIDNS TO TRIAL OCCURTENT CRIMINAL APPEALS FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF MAY 192015 ON REMAND AND MOTION TO AMEND HISTORY

On April 1,2015, the Court of Criminal Appeals remanded this matter to the trial court for additional findings.

The trial was not held in CDC No. 3. It was held in Auxiliary Court No. 7, before the retired visiting Judge Keith Dean.

HISTORY OF THE CASE

Applicant was wrongfully convicted by a jury of compelling prostitution and, on 12/17/2010, was sentenced by the trial Judge Keith Dean, to eight years confinement.

ISSUES RAISED IN APPLICATION

Quoting the State, dated March 6, 2015; "In five grounds for relief, applicant claims he is entitled to a new trial because the trial court granted his motion for new trial on January 5, 2011. Applicant further claims that, because the trial court granted his motion for new trial, the court of appeals never acquired jurisdiction over his case. Finally, applicant claims he was convicted in his companion cases without an arrest or arraignment, and request an explanation as to why records show he posted personal recogrizance bonds on the companion cases on February 24, 2011."

ISSUES RAISED IN REMAND ORDER

Applicant is entitled to a New Trial from cause Nos. FIO-0184, FIO-0183 & F08-60213, due to the fact that the motion for new trial was circled granted, and signed by a judge.

Page 1 of 8

*2 Quoting the court of Criminal Appeals, dated April 1, 2015; "the trial court shall determine whether the factual basis of Applicant's claim was available when he filed the 14 application in Dallas County on July 23, 2013. TEX, CODE CRIM. PROC. art. II. 07, &; 400. The trial court shall then determine whether Applicant's motion for new trial was granted; if so, whether this was the product of judicial reasoning and not a clerical mistake, who signed the motion at a later date, and when it was signed. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it seems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief."

FINDINGS OF FACT

Applicant finds that the motion for new trial was granted and signed by a Judge on January 5, 2011. See Exhibit 1. Look closely under ORDER, in Exhibit 1. It clearly shows that granted is circled, and then signed above JUDGE. The District Clerkdate stamped it on January 5, 2011 at 2:28 pm. The State claims: "How the signature came to be on the motion is not entirely clear." How is it not clear? Exhibit 1 clearly shows that above 'JUDGE', there is a signature signed under ORDER. Meanwhile, in Judge Pat McDowell's Affidavit, he specifically says: "Also among those papers is another copy of the motion for new trial which includes a signature in the portion of the motion which is to be signed by the Judge. That signature may be mine but I cannot say with certainty that I signed it." Judge McDowell claims that the signature may be his?? But he cannot say with certainty that he signed it?? Please look closely at Exhibit 1. Both signatures are remotely close to being the same. However, in Judge McDowell's Affidavit, dated April 23, 2015, is totally different than from the signatures shown in the granted Motion for New Trial. Then, Judge McDowell goes on to say: "I do know that directly below that signature I recognize a notation that was written, signed, and dated by me, indicating that I did not act on the motion for new trial." Notice that this Judge refers to his own signatures, as 'that signature', when he has stated that these signatures are his very Page 2 of 8

*3 own, He also claims that he did not act on the motion for new trial. If he didn't sign his name shown under ORDER, and circled granted, as shown in Exhibit 1, Someone else is responsible for this granted motion for new trial, because the signature from Judge McDowell, dated April 23, 2015, in his Affickult, clearly does not maden, the two signatures from Exhibit 1. This court must submit the original copy of Exhibit 1, to the Court of Criminal Appetts. Also, the State should be required to have a signature professional andusist to compare all three(3) signatures from Judge, ed McDowell; this will totally show proof of the Court's fraud, perjury, forgery, and the falsifying of government documents.

In Judge McDowell's Affickult, he goes on to say: "That notation is dated by me, indicating that I did not act on the motion for new trial. That notation is dated "7/7/201" and OnBree indicates that it was filled on that day." Again, in Exhibit 1, the District Clerk date stamped the motion on January 5, 2011, at 2:28 pm. If Judge McDowell's date of 7/7/201 was never recorded, than surely the District Clerk would have date stamped the document on 7/7/2011, that would also show the time that it would have been filled. Exhibit D, which is a copy of the Trial Docket sheet that Applicant had received in 2014, and it does not indicate any such hearings that were held on 7/7/2011. Exhibit 1 shows that the new trial was circled granted, and signed by a Judge, above the JUCgE portion, on January 5, 2011. Judge McDowell now claims that on 7/7/2011, he specifically wrote, "I did not rule on this." This six (6) month wait period totally exceeded and is outside of the 75 day limitations period, to act on any alleged corrections needed be, when a motion, the motion for new trial was ruled on. See Exhibit 2...

The reasons why the granted motion for new trial was never acted upon, is because the State Knew that Applicant had been illegally tried and illegally convicted for F0-01183 Sexual Performance by a child &; F0-0184 Sexual Assault on a Child due to the fact that Applicant was never once arrested, never once arranged, and was

*4 never once taken before any Magistrate Judge to participate in any first preliminary initial appearances from both Fraudulent tainted sex offenses, as is required by Texas Law. See Article 15.17 CODE CRUM. PRC. But Fraudulently, through falsifying documents, Dutts County District Clerk's office is showing four (1) different arrest dates from cause nos. F10-0183 &; F10-0184. They are also showing, through Fraud, that Applicant posted PR bonds for both cases, on 2/24/2011. See Extubit F. This document indicates more inconsistencies in the entire Records. Then, the State goes on to state, on page 2 of their findings of fact: "Even if the motion had been signed by a Judge, it was signed well after the motion had been overruled by operation of law." This statement is totally false. Ineffective defense counsel, Calvin D. Johnson submitted the motion for new trial, on 12/17/2010. On January 5, 2011, under ORDER, the motion was circled granted, then signed by a Judge. That's a total of 19 days later, after the District Clerk received the motion, on 12/17/2010. Less than 30 days. Then, a Judge waited six (6) months later, and hand-wrote 7/7/2011, "I did not rule on this." Totally operating outside of the 75 day limitations period for a motion for new trial. The Court of Appeals &; Court of Criminal Appeals, should want to Krouj; just what made this Judge decide to recovet this granted motion for new trial, on 7/7/2011, six (6) months later after it was granted; to write, "I did not rule on this."

In any event Applicant has written numerous letters, and has filed several petitions and motions, requesting his Records from cause nos. F086213, F10-0183 &; F10-0184, from ineffective defense counsel Calvin D. Johnson, and ineffective appeals counsel Lori Ordiney. To this date, no success period. It was not until Applicant filed his Motion for Chapter 61 DNA testing, from cause nos. F001183 &; F001184, in July of 2013; when Applicant finally received an incomplete copy of the trial transcript, from ineffective lawyer Julie Doucet. This transcript has hundreds of pages missing, received in september of 2013.

*5 In June of 2014, Applicant finally received a copy of the incomplete Clerk's record from cause Nos. F0-0183 and F0-0189, from appeals lawyer Michael Mawla, whom was assigned by Judge Gracie G. Lewis. Once Applicant received this Clerk's record, was when he discovered the granted motion for new trial, and requested Records from the District Clerk's office, and is continued to this date, to be very unsuccessful. Therefore, when Applicant filed his 14 application in Dallas County on July 23, 203, his PDR in 2012, and his 225 Y Federal Halvers Corpus in January of 2014. It was done without any of the Records. Simply because the State continues, to this date, to violate Applicant's due process of law, on not given him any of his requested Records.

Dallas County District Clerk's office has had many problems in the past for fraudently forging and falsifying documents against defendants, Applicant's entire illegal convictions evidences proof of fraud, per jury, forgery, and falsifying documents in cause Nos. F08-10213, F0-0183, and F0-0189. Therefore, this newly manufactured OnBase from the State is completely inconsistent, inaccurate, and totally incomplete. Much results in a reversal due to the fact that such incompleteness is of no fault of Applicant requiring a reversal and new trial under Tex.R.App.P.50(6), id 180-161. See Jones V. State, 942 Siv. 231, 1897 Tex. Cn.m. App. LEXIS 13 No. 0917-96. The Court of appeals will reverse a conviction, when the record is incomplete.

In any event Applicant sat in Dallas County illegally for 3 Y months, without any of his Records. Therefore, it was totally impossible for Applicant to raise this issue in his 14 application. Quoting the State from their page No. 2, "OnBase indicates that the original motion for new trial was filed, at the latest January 5, 2011, and it was signed in the judge signature portion of the motion on July 7, 2011." This is 100% untrue. Even Judge McDowell admitted in his affidavit, that the motion was signed under ORDER. ("That signature maybe mine but I cannot say with certainly that I signed it."). And the signed signature was on January 5, 2011, then, the State claims: "Because the motion was signed prior to the filing of Applicant's 14 application on July 23, 2013, Applicant could have and should have raised that issue in his 14 application." This is unbelievable! Again, Applicant filed an application on July 23, 2013, which was 11 months

*6 prior to finally receiving the incomplete Clerk's record from appats lawyer Michael Mouka, in June of 2014. Making it totally impossible for. Applicant to raise the issue in rewards to the granted motion for new trial. Besides, Applicant had to file a wort of Mandamus because this Court failed to timely respond to the H application that was fided on July 23, 2013. The Record will provide such evidence.

In exubit 1, the 'eye Test' evidences proof, showing that the motion for new trial was cricled granted, and clearly signed by a Jucbe, on January 5, 2011. If Judge Pat McDowell did not rule on this, motion, then the state should Reus on who fonged his unmatched signatures, but the fact is simply this: Exubit 1 shows that Applicant's motion for new trial was circled granted, and signed by a Judge on January 5, 2011.

The Court of Appads violated Applicant's due process of two by proceeding with the Direct Appads in cause Nos. F0-0189, F0-0183, and F086C83. The incomplete Clerk's record was finally received in May of 2014, by Court of Appads, which contains the granted motion for new trial. The Court of Appads continued to ORDER the District Clerk, seweraltimes, to file their clerk's record, from November of 2013, from cause Nos. F0-0183 &; F0-0189, which contains a copy of the granted motion for new trial. Applicant submitted a Retition to the Court of Appad, in rewards to the granted motion, and that Court instructed Applicant to conduct the State Counsel for offenders, which is clearly a huge waste of fine because scFo, is of no help. They instructed Applicant to hire an attemay, fact: The Court of Appads in Dallas is aware of the granted motion for new trial, but will not exercise due diligence in the interest of justice.

The Record from F0860213 compelling frostitution is totally incomplete and inconsistent. See attached Exubit 14, which is the manufactured-up trial Docket sheet from this Court. It shows the date 12/3/200, stating Motion to Consolidate &; Request to Stack, but it fails to show the invalid personal Recognizance bonds that were signed by Judge Gracie Lewis, on 12/3/2010, from cause Nos. F0-0182, F0-0185, F0-0189 &; F0-0185, See Exhibit B. Applicant had a courtdate, on 10/4/2010, for cause No. F086C83 only. In effective counsel Calvin D. Jahnson passed the case once again, and in November of 2010, Applicant received a letter from

*7 Caluin Johnson's office, stading that Applicant had a court date on 12/13/10. Even the State's withess, Terni Jennings had a court date set for 12/13/10, for her offense of F08-60214 Compelling Prostitution. See Exhibit C, page 4 of B, which is the Judicial Information document from cause No. F88-6023 that Applicant had received in February of 2014. In the State's newly filed Trial Decket sheet (Exhibit A), it does not note Applicant's court date in it, from 12/13/2010. Also, see Exhibit B, which is the Trial Decket sheet that Applicant received in June of 2014. This trial decket sheet shows the illegal conviction and sentence date (12/17/2010); then it does not show anything else, in regards to the ratings and grandings of the motion for new trial. Then, it shows the date of 6-2612; "Hearing Cont. on order of Ct. of appeals, Reconstructed charge. 6 L." is tally surpassing any events or activities in the entire year of 2011. Applicant reference anything about the hearing from 6-2612, because appeals lawyer Lori Ordinary purposely failed to inform him.

In Exhibit A, it shows CORRECTION, under Motion for New Trial, dated 7/7/2011. However, in Exhibit C, page 7 of B, under General Comments, it is't the date 7/7/2011 under SUPL-CLERK'S RECORD; CLERK'S RECORD/EEANNED, FL. It does not show anything in regards to any such corrections been made. Referring back to Exhibit A, it list the date of 12/21/2010, for Jail Depo Housader, in Exhibit C, page 5 of B, shows the date of 12/23/2010, which is only in reference to the fraudulently forged capias arrest warrants from cause Nos. F10-0182, F10-0183, F10-0184 & F10-0185; which shows an arrest date for all four (1) fainted offenses, as Dec. 23,2010. See Exhibit B, which is a copy of the forged arrest warrant. It is totally impossible for Applicant to have been arrested on Dec. 23,2010, for these fainted cases, when he was illegally convicted and sentenced on 12/17/2010, for cause Nos. F88-60213, F10-0183, and F0-0184; And those four (1) capias warrants were dismissed by the District Attorney's office on 11/21/2010. Refer to Exhibit E.

It must be repeated that the Record from F08-60213 Compelling Prostitution, F000183 sexual Performance by a Child &; F10-0184 Sexual Assault on a Child, is totally incomplete, and without Applicant's fault.

Page 7 of 8

*8

Therefore, when the record is incomplete without any fault of Applicants, such incompleteness requires a reversal and new trial under Tex.R. App.P. 50$eld. at 160-161. See Jones V. State, 942 S.U. 2d 1, 1997 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 13 NO. 0917-96; where the Court of Appeals has specifically said, "We will reverse." See also, Jones V. State, 923 S.U. 2d 158 (Tex.App.-Beaumont 1996) &; Williams V. State, 937 S.U. 2d 479, 486-87(Tex.Crim.App. 1996). Relief must be granted.

APPLICANT'S RECOMMENDATION

Applicant respectfully recommends that the Honorable Court of Criminal Appeals to ORDER this Court and the trial Court, to have an Evidentiary Hearing in regards to all of the Factual Disputes, and the incompleteness of the Records from cause Nos. F08-60213, F000183 &; F000189, And to also ERANT Applicant's writ of habers corpus.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on May 11, 2015, the foregoing document has been U.S. mailed to: Felicia Atte District Clerk, 133 N. Riverfront Blvd., L812, Dallas, TX 75207; Court of Criminal Appeals, R0. 80x 12308 , Austin, TX 78711; And U.S. States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, office of the Clerk, 600 S. MAESTRI PL, New Orleans, Louisiana 70130.

P.S.

Please safeguard my Liberty

Pace Bof 8

*9

*10

WRIT ND.1008-60213-X(5)

EX PARTE SENRICK WJLKERSON

IAN THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 3 DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS

"Applicant is requesting that this Court to produce the hearing minutes from the granted motion for New Trial, on January 5, 2011. See Exhibit 1. Also, Applicant request that this Court to produce the hearing minutes from the notation, dated 7/7/2011, when the Judge specifically wrote, "I did not rule on this."

The Four-Health Amendment to the United States Constitution provide that no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. U.S. Const. Amend. XIV 1. The States action has deprived Applicant of such interest due to the fact that, on January 5, 2011, the motion for new trial was granted, and signed by a Judge. Applicant sat in Dallas County Jail illegally for 34 months, and he was never once informed that this motion for new trial was granted, these actions executed by the Court totally deprived Applicant of life, liberty, or his property without due process of law. Since this motion for new trial was granted on January 5, 2011, Applicant should have been informed by ineffective and deficient defense counsel Calvin D. Johnson. See again, Exhibit 1, which shows proof that Applicant is entitled to a new trial, and the Appeals Court should have never gained any jurisdiction over cause Nos. F08-60213, F10-0183 &; F10-0184. These violations of due process evidence Applicant's demonstrations that he was deprived of his life, liberty, and property. See Valmonte V. Kane, 18 F. 3d 992,998 (2nd Cir. 1999)."

Executed on May 12,2015

SENRICK WJLKERSON

*11

*12

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:

That I, SENRIK WIIKERSHA as principal, and being the defendant in the charge referred to herein, am held and firmly bound unto THE STATE OF TEXAS in the penal sum of Tean thewogons ( $ 10 , 000 , 00 ) DOLLARS, payable to said State, and for the payment of which sum, well and truly to be made, I do bind myself, my heirs, executors and administrators, jointly and severally by these presents, and in addition thereto, I am bound for the payment of all necessary and reasonable expenses incurred by any and all sheriffs or other peace officers in re-arresting me as principal in the event I fail to appear before the court or courts provided for herein at the time stated herein, the amount of such expense shall be in addition to the prucipal amount specified herein. For the payment of which sum or sums well and truly to be made as aforesaid, I do bind myself, my heirs executors and administrators, jointly and severally by these presents; this bond shall be valid and binding upon me as principal, for my personal appearance before the court designated herein and before any court in which this cause may hereafter be pending at any time when, and place where, my presence may be required under the Code of Criminal Procedure of the State of Texas or by any such court and for any and all subsequent court proceedings had relative to the hereinafter described charge.

CONDITIONED, that, whereas, I as principal, now in the legal custody of the Sheriff of Dallas County, Texas charged in due form of the law in the C&;is is € 1 District Court 1 4 of Dallas County, Texas, in Cause No. FIDORES 3 , and styled the State of Texas vs. SENRIK WIIKERSHA, with a colony offense, and who by the order of the judge of said court has been required to give my personal bond in the sum set out above, conditioned for my personal appearance before said last named court on the 1 3 day of 1 3 e 1 − μ b μ A.D. 20 , 10 , at 9:00 o'clock A.M., or upon notice by the court and any other court provided for herein, to answer the said above described charge now pending against me and for any and all subsequent proceedings had relative to the charge. Now, if I as principal shall make my personal appearance as provided for herein before said C&;is is € 1 District Court 1 4 of Dallas County, Texas, in the Courthouse in the City of Dallas, Dallas County, Texas, and there remain from day to day and term to term of said court until discharged by due course of law, then and there to answer said above described charge, and shall personally appear as provided for herein before any court in which this said cause may hereafter be legally pending as well as before any other court to which said cause may be transferred, at any time when, and place where, my presence may be required under the Code of Criminal Procedure of the State of Texas or by any of such courts, and there remain from day to day and term to term of any of such courts in which or before whomever said charge is pending, for any and all subsequent proceedings had relative to the charge, until discharged by due course of law, then the above bond will be null and void, otherwise to be and remain in full force and effect.

I swear that I will appear before the C 1 2 is is € 3 District Court 1 4 of Dallas County, Texas, at the County Courthouse, 133 N. Industrial Blvd., the City of Dallas, Dallas County, Texas, on the day of 1 2 e 1 − c μ b 1 2 (T) A.D. 20 , 10 , at 9:00 o'clock A.M., or upon notice by the court, or pay to the court the principal sum of $ 10 , 000 , 00 plus all necessary and reasonable expenses incurred in any arrest for failure to appear.

SWORN to and subscribed by before me, on the 2 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C 1 2 C

*13

*14

SETS AND PASSES

B060 SET FOR DATE 010101 SET FOR TIME 0000 SET TYPE OTHE PASSED TO DATE SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY COMMENTS $2,500_G&;G_B/R STATES RECOMMENDATION REC N O 01

DA CASE ID F-0860213 JUDCL CASE ID F-0860213
A010 DEF NAME WILKERS CO10 DEF NAME WILKERS
SETS AND PASSES

B060 SET FOR DATE 090308 SET FOR TIME 0000 SET TYPE OTHE PASSED TO DATE SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY COMMENTS * * * STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01 B060 SET FOR DATE 110308 SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE FIRS PASSED TO DATE SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY COMMENTS SURETY_NOTIFIED_101508 STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01 B060 SET FOR DATE 111708 SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE ANNO PASSED TO DATE SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY COMMENTS STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01 B040 SET FOR DATE 121008 SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE ANNO PASSED TO DATE SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY COMMENTS STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01

DA CASE ID F-0860213 JUDCL CASE ID F-0860213 A010 DEF NAME WILKERS CO10 DEF NAME WILKERS SETS AND PASSES B060 SET FOR DATE 010709 SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE ANNO PASSED TO DATE SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY COMMENTS

*15 DA CASE ID F-0860213 JUDCL CASE ID F-0860213 A010 DEF NAME WILKERS CO10 DEF NAME WILKERS SETS AND PASSES B060 SET FOR DATE 042909 SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE ANNO PASSED TO DATE SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY _ COMMENTS STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01 B060 SET FOR DATE 051309 SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE ANNO PASSED TO DATE SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY _ COMMENTS STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01 B060 SET FOR DATE 060309 SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE ANNO PASSED TO DATE SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY _ COMMENTS STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01 B060 SET FOR DATE 080309 SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE TRIL PASSED TO DATE SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY _ COMMENTS JURY_TRIAL STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01 B060 SET FOR DATE 080309 SET FOR TIME 0900 SET TYPE TRIL PASSED TO DATE SET DISPOSITION CODE PASSED GENERALLY _ COMMENTS JURY_TRIAL STATES RECOMMENDATION REC NO 01

*16

*17

*18

*19

DESIGNATION OF RECORD DEFENSE 000000 STATE 000000 TRANSCRIPT FILED 071311 OBJECTION 000000 DATE NOTICE SENT 000000 DATE SENT TO APPEALS 000000 OPINION DATE 000000 MANDATE RECEIVED 061013 DISP A MANDATE ENFORCED DATE 061013 APPEAL WITHDRAWN 000000 CT REPORTER INITIALS ST_

APPEAL REF CODE 0150 REC. NO 50

GENERAL COMMENTS

C080 090110_BENCH_WARRANT_ISSUED_FOR_BRANDI_MATHIS_PER_BROOK_ROBB DATE 090110 C080 040111_- VOLS_1-7 (DISC)/SUSAN_TABLEE,_CSR/AM DATE 040411 C080 070611__FILE_TO_COURT_FOR_CORRECTIONS/FL DATE 070611 C080 070511__SUPL_CLERK'S_RECORD;CLERK'S_RECORD/SCANNED/FL DATE 070711

DA CASE ID F-0860213 JUDCL CASE ID F-0860213
A010 DEF NAME WILKERS CO10 DEF NAME WILKERS GENERAL COMMENTS

C080 70811__2ND_TIME_TO_COURT_FOR_CORRECTIONS/FL DATE 070811 C080 071311 - CLERK'S_RECORD_PREPARED_AND_SENT_ELECTRONICALLY/AM DÄTE 071311 C080 092111_RETURNED_REPORTERS_RECORDS/VOL.1-7/SUSAN_TABLEE/FL DATE 092111 C080 111011_CHECKED_OUT_REPORTERS_RECORD/VOL.1-4/BOBBY_ROBERTSON/FL DATE 111011 C080 SUPPLEMENTAL_SENT_ELECTRONICALLY_TO_STH_COA DATE 060712 C080 REPORTER'S_RECORD_RECV'D_FROM_XAVIER,_CSR /8H DATE 062912 C080 POSTCARD_RECV'D, APPELLANT'S_PET_FOR_DISCRETIONARY_REVIEW_HAS_BEEN_RECV'D AND_FILED_110512 DATE 111312 C080 MANDATE_RECEIVED_FROM_STH_COA_ON_6/10/13_-_AFFIRMING_TRIAL_COURT'S_JUDGMEN DATE 082313

*20

| New Search | Printer View | Back | | :-- | :-- | :-- |

View disposition and court codes

Copyright (c) 2010 Dallas County Online. All Rights Reserved. Frounently Asked Questions | Privacy Statement | Help | AOA Statement | Site Index | Send comments to webmaster@dallascounty.org

*21

*22

*23

Case Details

Case Name: Wilkerson, Senrick Shern
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: May 19, 2015
Docket Number: WR-77,138-29
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.