OW JAN. 11, 2013. YON VENDED AN ORDER OF ABATEMENT FOR APPELLATE COUNSEL CALVIN' PARKS. THE CASE WAS PERMANDED TO THE THAL COURT FOR AN ABATEMENT ORDER HENRUG AT WHICH CALVIN PARKS, A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE STATE + THE APPELLANT WAS TO ATTEND. OW JAN. 31, 2013. THE APPELLANT WAS BENCH WARMANT + THE HENRUG WAS CONDUCTED ON FEB. 5, 2013.

YOUR ORDER RECLUSTED THE THAL COURT TO MAKE WRITTEN FINDINGS REEARDING (1) WHERE THE APPELLANT WISHED TO PURSNE THE APPEAL: (2) WHERE ACOD CAUSE EXISTED TO RELIEVE CAVIN PARKS OF HIS DITIES AS APPELLANT'S COUNSEL; (4)OF ACOD CAUSE DID EXISTS, ENTER AN ORDER RELIEVING CALVIN PARKS OF HIS DITIES AS APPELLANT'S COUNSEL + APPLIANT SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT; (6) OF ACOD CAUSE DID NOT EXISTS, ORDER CALVIN PARKS TO FILE A EPIEF IN THIS COURT NO LATER THAN ID DANS FROM THE DATE OF THE HENRUG.

THE THAL COURT WAS ASSO ORDERED TO HAVE A COURT REPORTER RECORD THE HENRUG + FILE THE REPORTER'S RECORD OF THE HENRUG

*2 With this COURT, MAKE FINDINGS a ReCommendations + ANN ORDERS ISAuED PUBSuANt TO THE HERRuUS IN A SUPPLEMENTAL CLEAR'S RECORD NO LATER THAN 20 DANS FROM THE DATE THAT THE ORDER WAS ISSuED.

The AFFeAL WouLD HAVE ONLY BEEN REWISTATED WITH THIS COURT'S ACTIVE DICKET WHEN THE SUPPLEMENTAL CLEAR'S RECORD A REPORTERS RECORD OF THE HERRuUS WAS FILED WITH THIS COURT.

The AFFeLANT HAS THOROUGHLY REVIENDED THE TRaAL COURT'S RECORDS IN REBARD TO THIS CAUSE, HOWEVER, I HAVE FOLLD NO SUPPLEMENTAL REPORTERS RECORD IN PUBSuANt TO TEX. P. APP. PROC. PULE 34.10 FOR THE ABATEMENT ORDER HERRUUS HELD ON FEBRUARY 5, 2013, AS YOU REBUESTED. I HAVE ONLY FOLLD THE SUPPLEMENTAL CLEAR'S RECORD IN PUBSuANt TO TEX. P. APP. PROC. PULE 34.5.

Did You RECEIVE THE SUPPLEMENTAL REPORTERS RECORD FOR THE ABATEMENT ORDER HERRUUS TO EXPLAIN AFFELLATE COURSEL'S CALLIN HARKS DISREBARD FOR EPIEFIUS DERDLINES?

CAN You RECEIVE SAID THE AFFeLANT A COPY OF THE SUPPLEMENTAL REPORTERS RECORD OF THE ABATEMENT ORDER HERRUUS ON FEBRUARY 5, 2013.

Respectfully Submitted, StERON B. TERRELL Shevon St. Semell

*3