History
  • No items yet
midpage
Arnold Ray Lamotte v. State
01-15-00368-CR
| Tex. App. | Apr 30, 2015
|
Check Treatment
Case Information

*1 APPELLATE CAUSENO. ARHOLD RAYLAMOTTE, JR. D. IN THE THIRD P. 5.5 Appellant

Ys THE STATE OF TEXAS Appellec's D. J.

STATE OF TEXAS (1) COURT OF APPEAL CHRISTOPHERA. PRINE, CLERK

SECOND EMERGENCYMOTION FOR ANAPPELLANT BOND AND/OR REINSTATEMENT OF PREVIOUS BOND KNOWALLMENT BY THESE PRESENT:

COMES NOW FORTH, ARNOLD RAY LAMOTTE, JR., L'HERESN AFTER as the Pro-Se Appellant). The Pro-Se Appellant filed upon March 9th, 2015, to this Havorable Court a Mettles for a Bond in which he is entitled to, because of a lower County Court Sisk(6) misdemeanor Court Judge Brandy Mueller has been caught violating Texas and United States Federal Constitutionl laws and Amendments in terchinnlly, knownlly, and deliborately, by the following reasons of:

CAUSE NUMBER C-1-CR 12-300293 IS A BARREO CASE The Presiding Judge Brandy Mueller, ordered the Pro-Se Appellant to Jail on a Statute of Limitation case by her ruling upon December 9th, 2014 (DENIED, the States failure to file an Information for cause

*2 Number C1CRJ00283), for the Statute of Limitation BARRED prosecution by the State clearly shown to have not ever filled accimind offence. Then, the Judge treus around on the same day and Grants another Information swery out by the State Prosecutor being the only one accusing the Pracie Defendant of Theft by one Check of 8200 . [8] from Septem by 85, 2011 and now just filling an I nformation upon December 9, 2014, (with oust a sworn out valid complaint, from H.E.B), and nobody else, for nobody from H.E.B. signed no sworn out complaint against the Pracie Defendant.

Therefore, the Judge has committed prejudice and discrimination against the Pracie Defendant and have violated his ( 4 44 ) first, ( 4 44 ) fourth, ( 5 4 ) fifth, (64) Sixth, (89) Eighth and (144) Fourteenth Amendment Constitutiond Law Rights by STDE, the State was BARRED of prosecution, pursuant to the Statute of Limitation Constitutiond laws, see Exhibit"A" attached. . . WHERE B FOR PERMISES CONSIDERED, the Pracie Defendant prays Rehim to be "GRANTED" an Appellate Personal Recognition Bail Bond, or he be ordered back upon the Bail Bond he was previously on, or he be allowed to pay no more than $ 100 , 00 m o x , by he might not be able to have family members get so more then that much, by

*3 it now over 45 days without any kind of help shown to come and be held against my liberty illgally and awlowfully and under False Imprisonment by the State and by the County Court Judge Mueller ... SIGNED THIS IS DAY OF ADECIL Respectfully Submitted, WILLIAMS

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Arnold Rey LaMette, Jr., the Praise Defendant, HEREBY certify, that a true and correct coples of Second Emergency Matron for An Adeellant Bond And/or Reim statement of Previous Bond, has been served by prepaid First class strange envelope and put in the United States mail and served by and though Travis County Co-rettor Complex Law Library Clerk to be filed to the Texas Court of Criminal Apecl: Court and Clerk's office, EXECUTED on this 10th day of April 2015 (1) Third Court of Apeeds Clerk's office PO Box 12547 Austh, Texas 7871

*4 APPELLATE CANENo.

ARNOIDRAY LAMOTTE, JR. SID IN THE THIRD RAVEAUGHENT DID COURT OF APPBALS THE STATE OF TEXAS DID FOR AUSTIN, TEXAS APPELLENT DID

ORDERS

Upon this day and date, it came before this Court "Arnold LaMotte, Jr. is Second Emergency Motion for An Appellant Bond Andor Relivstatement of Previous Bond." After careful reviews, facts and considerations present before this Court. The Court Finds, ORDERS, ADJUDCED ANDDECREED THAT:

[ ] This Motion is ORDEREED GRANTED" and it is further ORDER that:

[ ] A Appellate Personal Boil Bond is "GRANTED" and Arnold LaMotte, Jr. is ORDEREED out of State Custody and on Personal Appellate Bond pending the outcome of his Appellat body finalize;

[ ] Arnold LaMotte, Jr. is to be Reivistated back upon his original boil Bond and is further ORDEREED out of State custody pending the finalize completed outcome of his Appell...;

[ ] That an Appellate Boil Bond of 8100. "dellers is ORDEREED "GRANTED" and it is further ORDEREED" that Arnold LaMotte, Jr.

*5 be removed out of States custody upon paying this amount... [ ] This Motion is ORDECED, DENIED, for the Bllavily reasons of: SIGNED THIS DAYOF 2015

Presiting Judges Sigmertire Printed Judges Sigmertire

*6

*7 APPELLATE CAUSE No.

ARNOIDRAY LAMOTTE, JR. 3/3/ IN THE THIRD Pe. 5 Appellant 3/3/ COMPY OF APPERALS THE STATE OF TEXAS 3/3/ FOR AUSTIN, TEXAS Appellant 3/3/ J

EMERGENCY MOTION FOR AN APPELLANT BAIL BOND AND/OR REINSTATEMENT OF PREVIOUS BOND

KNOWALLMENT BY THESE PRESENT:

THAT I, ARNOID RAY LAMOTTE, JR. [NEREINAFTER as the Pe. 5 Appellant], COMES FORTH to seek an reasonable Appellant Bond, from this Third Court of Appeals, for an reasonable or void rendered conviction of the July check (one - $200. "Buffer check). Which was BARRED by Statute of Limitation for prosecution.

Upon the 27th day of February, 2015 in the lower County Court Sile, the Pe. 5 Appellant was convicted upon a BARRED out of time criminal Misdemonor Case that had no valid Information filled timely, nor had filled complaint filled either, for a charge of the July check. After the false and voided conviction and sentence was rendered against the Pe. 5 Appellant's objections numerous times and by his ineffective counsel refused to stand up to the Judge and State Executor, after he prove cause no. CICR 12300283 was BARRED for prosecution (previously Judge Mueller, approve Statute of limitation based and/or shown bored prosecution, see Transcript Records, Matters between November 17, 2014, the

*8 December 9, 2014) Judge Brendy Mueller never found the Pro-Se Appellant to Plea, No. pass nohind of danger to safety of others, nor that this Appell is not for the purposes of delays, because the Pro- Se Appellant is able to prove in his punding Post Conviction Relief's Brief (being held up by Appellai agencies by blocking and delaying the Pro- Se Appellant of his Access To Courtheged material's and supplies to do the Brief, etc...). The Pro-se Appellant is able to prove also not only that the Bar study that the Bar study shows for cause no. C1CR12 200283, but also able to prove that the lower county Count S/x (b), FAILED to invoke Jurisdiction over the Pro- Se Appellant and over cause no. C1CR12 300283. There fore, by these TEXAS and Matted States Federal Constitution violations would raise substantial questions of laws to be address Immediately and would be in favor to the Pro- Se Appellant, which in turn would have this Count ORDEA Immediately a Reversed and dismiss cause no. C1CR12 200283, for nohind of conviction, sentence or imprisonment, which cannot be allowed by law, Science vs State, 614 S.W.24.453 (Tex.Crim. App. 1981)

Under TEX. Code of Crim. Proc. Rule 44.04(a) cites and states that the Defendant is entitled to continue on the current band that is the is on, while their Appell is pending and/or awaiting find disposal of their case, see Bevis y state, 91 S.W. 3d. 844 (Tex. App. - Texerken = 2012), see

*9 also Lyted y State, 408 S.W.22.227 [Tex. Crim.App. 1966]. The Judge and Court clearly shown to have no kind of Jurisdiction should be allowed for the Prose Appellant to remother upon his current bail bonds Insted, Judge Mueller is clearly shown helping the State Prosecutor Sivnin III commit criminal offenses against Arnold LeMotte, Jr. Intentionally, knowingly, and deliberately and is punishing him without any criminal offense charged against him, legally andlor lawfully, for Judge Mueller is NOI interesting in Justice, wor even shown to be wanting to follow theel AWs of Texas, for she never express no concern regarding failure to appear, wor even endangerment of safety to others, andor likely to fita; see Cucllar y State, 985 S.W.22.656 [Tex.App. Houston [10.04] 1999; see Veruour's Aun Texas Const. Art. 148; seados United States Federal Const. (80) and 14 A.mend mectos...

The Prose Appellant is entitled to an Apped Prooond Recognize Bell Bond because of his charge current heve him in or under False Imprisonments, especially when the lower County Court Six Judge denied the Prose Appellant an Appellate bond, which viblates his Texas Constitution ort. [UII(a)(a); see Kelley y State, 785 S.W.2A. [Tex. Crim. App. 1990]; seados. Texas, Cote of Criminal Rese, art. 44.0499. WHEAFORE Premises CONSIDERS D, the Prose Appellant

*10

proyess for the Grewitity of this Motion and it is furtherd projected for that he be Ordered out of False Imprisonment of States custody and placed upon either an Appellate Presend Recognization Bail Band or be reivstated back upon his original Presend Recognization Bail Band...

SIGN THIS IS DAY OF MACK

Respectfully submittly, WILLIAMS Prof. A PPELLIATES

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Aruwit LaMotte, Sr., 1480801 certifying that a true and correct copy has been served by pre-poid first class stoop, envelope as the Emery- enc Y Motion for An Appellate Bail Band And/or Recivistement of Previews Bond, which was put in the United States Maile E XECUTED on this 10th Day of Mack, 2015, address to: (c) Third Court of Appuls Cloth's office

Price Daniel Sr. Building 209 West 14th Street, Room 101 Austin, Texas 78701

WILLIAMS

Prof. A PPELLIATES SERVICE

*11

APPELLATE CAUSE No. ARWOLD RAY LAMOTTE, JR. (b) IN THE THIRD Pro.ic Appellant D) COURT of APPEALS The State of Texas AppeLusis W. FON AMSTH, TEXAS

ORDER'S

Upon this day and date it came before this Court "Arnold LeMotte, Jr.'s Emergency Motion for An Appellant Bell Bond And/or Refinstate meant of Previous Bond." After careful reviews and special cousideration of the facts proved before this Court. WE FIND THAT ITISORDER, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT: [ ] This Motion is HERERY ORDER "GRANTED" and it is further "ORDER": [ ] GRANTED Appellate Personal Recogrized BellBond and ORDERED Immobility release out of state custody, pending find thispose of his Appell... [ ] That Arnold Le Motte, Jr. is Refinstated back upon his Personal Recogrized BellBond and further ORDERED" out of Immobility release states custody, pending find thispose of his Appell... [ ] This Motion is HERERY ORDERED ORNICED for the following

*12 MR. ARNOLD LAMATTE, JR. Boehnyno, 1507853

TEAVIS County Correction Complex 3614 Bill Price Road DellYelle, Texas 75617

ALISTIN TX 787 RIO GRANDE DISTRICT 28.APR 2015 PM 5 L

ATIENTION: LEGAL DOCUMENTS EHCLONE TO: THIRD CONAT OF APPERAL'S CLERK'S OFFICE P.O. Box 12547

Austing Texas 78711

Case Details

Case Name: Arnold Ray Lamotte v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Apr 30, 2015
Docket Number: 01-15-00368-CR
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.